Motown Bombers Posted Friday at 02:18 PM Posted Friday at 02:18 PM 6 minutes ago, chasfh said: Harris was the cipher of a vice president that every modern VP outside of Cheney has been. Even J.D. Couch****er is a big zero as far as that goes, no matter how loud he becomes or how many news cycles he hijacks. There is almost nothing in their vice presidency a candidate can point to and say that makes them qualified to be president, and Harris was no exception. Biden was the reason Obamacare got passed. Biden is the sole reason for Obama’s crowning achievement. Quote
chasfh Posted Friday at 02:21 PM Posted Friday at 02:21 PM 2 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: Biden was the reason Obamacare got passed. Biden is the sole reason for Obama’s crowning achievement. Granted. Quote
Tiger337 Posted Friday at 03:07 PM Posted Friday at 03:07 PM Biden should have been President and Obama VP from 2008-2016. Then Obama should have run in 2016. Obama is very smart, but may not have been ready for the presidency. Biden was unimpressive intellectually, but knew how to work with Congress. Biden was too old and senile at the end and a more experienced Obama would have been a better choice at that time. 1 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted Friday at 03:19 PM Posted Friday at 03:19 PM Biden should have ran in 2016 but Obama backstabbed him to clear the deck for Clinton. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted Friday at 04:21 PM Posted Friday at 04:21 PM Anyone remember when the Grand Old Pedo Party championed “Family Values” Quote
romad1 Posted Friday at 04:26 PM Author Posted Friday at 04:26 PM 3 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Anyone remember when the Grand Old Pedo Party championed “Family Values” But the cowboy hat! Quote
chasfh Posted Friday at 04:30 PM Posted Friday at 04:30 PM 1 hour ago, Tiger337 said: Biden should have been President and Obama VP from 2008-2016. Then Obama should have run in 2016. Obama is very smart, but may not have been ready for the presidency. Biden was unimpressive intellectually, but knew how to work with Congress. Biden was too old and senile at the end and a more experienced Obama would have been a better choice at that time. FEIW, I don’t think Biden was clinically senile at the end. Quote
Tiger337 Posted Friday at 04:35 PM Posted Friday at 04:35 PM Just now, chasfh said: FEIW, I don’t think Biden was clinically senile at the end. Not clinically, but he was very much in decline from his peak. I don't know how far he fell between the end of his presidency and that debate, but that debate was uncomfortably embarrassing. Trump was embarrassing too but being embarrassing is his baseline and his followers don't care anyway. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted Friday at 04:36 PM Posted Friday at 04:36 PM Biden with only half a mind would still be better than Trump’s “genius” brains Quote
oblong Posted Friday at 05:18 PM Posted Friday at 05:18 PM He slowed down physically, and visually in terms of performance, but I am not convinced he couldn't do the job. The mind is what matters and I wasn't there and I don't trust the media or staff members to give us an honest account. But politically that stuff does matter and difficult conversations should have been had earlier. 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Friday at 06:40 PM Posted Friday at 06:40 PM (edited) 4 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: Biden was the reason Obamacare got passed. Biden is the sole reason for Obama’s crowning achievement. I would say that by the std of what a hopeless role it is, Biden and Gore both had pretty successful vice-presidencies - Biden didn't run, Gore lost his White House bid. GHWB did win a Presidency from the VP but he had a really long resume prior, was well known pre-VP -- maybe even better than Biden was. You can blame the press for some of Harris' problem - no doubt the MSM had their head up their butts through most of the Biden presidency, but whose fault it was is pretty much beside the point, it justs add to the premise that from 2020 t0 2024 Harris was not able to do much to build/burnish a public profile sufficient to help put her on a path to a win. Edited Friday at 06:41 PM by gehringer_2 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Friday at 06:45 PM Posted Friday at 06:45 PM 3 hours ago, Motown Bombers said: Biden should have ran in 2016 but Obama backstabbed him to clear the deck for Clinton. Obama seems like a great guy, is a good campaigner and better orator, but his judgement as a political operative, party manager/leader was never in the same league with this other skills. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted Friday at 07:17 PM Posted Friday at 07:17 PM (edited) Long before Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Bernie Sanders came onto the scene, there were options to stop Donald Trump or a guy like him from taking control of the White House. The best way to have avoided Trump would have been to reelect Jimmy Carter in 1980. We likely don't get Trump if we didn't have the failed presidency of Reagan and the era of deregulation and union-busting that came about as a result. The next best way to have not gotten Trump was to elect Walter Mondale and stop/reverse much of what Reagan did. After that, it would have been to have had a progressive President like Jesse Jackson to reverse what Reagan did and bring back the New Deal era of the Democratic Party, minus the segregation and discrimination of course. After that, the next best time to have stopped Trump would have been to nominate someone like Paul Tsongas as the Democratic nominee for President in 1992 instead of the Diet Cola Republican that was Bill Clinton. We got Trump as President not because of any one person, though Reagan and Clinton aided in him becoming President. We got Trump largely because of bad economic policies built around failed economic theory. Trickledown Economics and an era of deregulation gave us Trump. Not supporting the material conditions of working and retired Americans gave us Trump. This failed economic theory of putting the wealthy on top and assuming wealth would trickle down the pyramid was deeply flawed and always doomed to fail. It gave us an exploding wealth gap and stagnant wages. They gave us an economy where people's economic means were not keeping up with their cost of living. We got Trump because bad trade deals like NAFTA/CATFA/PNTR with China, guided by failed economic theory, crippled blue collar jobs and hollowed us industrial states. We got Trump because economic theory and big business told us that it is better to have employer-based, market-priced health insurance that leaves many uninsured, many more underinsured, and millions bankrupt due to costs they incurred after getting sick. We didn't get a demagogue like Trump after FDR. Even though FDR had to deal with the worst economic crisis in our countries history, he and the Democrats gained strength through his Presidency. We got 4 terms of FDR because he was so beloved by Americans. And he was so beloved because he helped improved the economic well being of the average American and guided us through a World War, nearly to victory before dying. They buffered the economy with regulations like Glass-Stegall and prevented economic shocks like the Great Depression from routinely occurring. They improved the lot of the ordinary (white) American with Social Security, the Public Works Administration, federal jobs programs, National Industrial Recovery Act, Electric Home and Farm Authority, and more. These programs provided financial security and jobs for people so thy wouldn't fall into despair and become susceptible to demagogues like Trump. And they paid for it all and created financial stability with progressive income taxation on the wealthy and big business. We can complain about who should have run when to stop Trump. While that has some relevancy, the real debate should be centered around policy. Bad policies, built around a failed economic theory of Trickledown Economics, being implemented are what lead to the material conditions of working and middle class Americans getting worse. The Presidents and Congresses who pushed them are certainly to blame. Edited Friday at 07:20 PM by Mr.TaterSalad Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Friday at 08:49 PM Posted Friday at 08:49 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: The best way to have avoided Trump would have been to reelect Jimmy Carter in 1980. We likely don't get Trump if we didn't have the failed presidency of Reagan and the era of deregulation and union-busting that came about as a result The problem is the economy might not have survived 4 more years of JC. We were headed for hyperinflation and Carter - and much of the traditional central banking community, had no idea what to do about it. Looking back I find it weird because the one thing Carter was, was a smart guy. If he have been willing to sit down with a Paul Volker or Milton Friedman or maybe even James Baker he certainly had the intellect to understand why it was critical that the 'new' monetarist paradigm had to be put in place at the Federal Reserve. But for whatever reason he never got there, and for all the talk about the Rose Garden and Iran, it was inflation that doomed his presidency. His fecklessness on Iran was just icing on the cake of a failed economic situation. I really wanted him to succeed, but at that point in his life he (and his team) were too sure of themselves to see when they needed to go get some better advice. Edited Friday at 08:50 PM by gehringer_2 Quote
Screwball Posted yesterday at 02:24 AM Posted yesterday at 02:24 AM I just picked this as a random article. Doesn't matter who you get it from the story is pretty much the same. What a sick ****ing world we live in, and these people are pikers compared to the Epstein class who runs the world. 122 people arrested in Ohio human trafficking crackdown: "Operation Spring Cleaning" Don't know why this doesn't get more national news. But I guess the perverts all know the other perverts. As a parent... 1 1 Quote
oblong Posted yesterday at 02:45 PM Posted yesterday at 02:45 PM Seems like it would be easy to get people in that activity. Like any random “massage” place has to be a front for this, right? You tell me that next to a dollar general and check cashing place is where you can just go in and get an above board massage? Quote
romad1 Posted yesterday at 03:08 PM Author Posted yesterday at 03:08 PM Was going through corporate training and they identified their anti-Human trafficking policy and it stressed that any prostitution was in and of itself human trafficking. Which is pretty interesting. Had a parent of one of my softball players who was a former victim of trafficking and she told me a bunch of her stories. She was a very attractive woman but her daughter was terrible at ball. Her legal record prevented her from joining as one of the assistant coaches but she actually was an expert witness for several anti-trafficking organizations and consulted for the DOJ (when they cared about such things). Quote
romad1 Posted yesterday at 03:12 PM Author Posted yesterday at 03:12 PM 2 minutes ago, romad1 said: Was going through corporate training and they identified their anti-Human trafficking policy and it stressed that any prostitution was in and of itself human trafficking. Which is pretty interesting. Had a parent of one of my softball players who was a former victim of trafficking and she told me a bunch of her stories. She was a very attractive woman but her daughter was terrible at ball. Her legal record prevented her from joining as one of the assistant coaches but she actually was an expert witness for several anti-trafficking organizations and consulted for the DOJ (when they cared about such things). FTR, I don't think her mom's prostitution prevented her from learning how to hit but it didn't help. Quote
Screwball Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) I'm old, and I don't understand how this **** still goes on. WTF are we doing? We know of the Epstein class, and that's only part of the grand perversion that's been going on for how long? We can name names. Nothing - ever - happens. Other than a sacrificial sucker every once in a while. How can Maxwell be convicted and sitting in jail for trafficking humans and the perps walk the street????? Come on! Then there is this news from Ohio. On a much smaller scale with who knows how many more victims. Who knows how widespread this is. It should be easier on the smaller level to rat these people out. They are not rich celebrities with power and influence. I really don't get it. This one hits close to home. I know a guy on that list. He was a classmate of one of my sons. We were shocked to hear it. Came from a good family. Something went wrong somewhere. I honestly don't know what to think of the world we live in today. We have lost our way. Edited 22 hours ago by Screwball Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Screwball said: We have lost our way. QFT Quote
LaceyLou Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 11 hours ago, Screwball said: I'm old, and I don't understand how this **** still goes on. WTF are we doing? We know of the Epstein class, and that's only part of the grand perversion that's been going on for how long? We can name names. Nothing - ever - happens. Other than a sacrificial sucker every once in a while. How can Maxwell be convicted and sitting in jail for trafficking humans and the perps walk the street????? Come on! Then there is this news from Ohio. On a much smaller scale with who knows how many more victims. Who knows how widespread this is. It should be easier on the smaller level to rat these people out. They are not rich celebrities with power and influence. I really don't get it. This one hits close to home. I know a guy on that list. He was a classmate of one of my sons. We were shocked to hear it. Came from a good family. Something went wrong somewhere. I honestly don't know what to think of the world we live in today. We have lost our way. Unfortunately this has been going on for decades and likely centuries. The only difference is that in recent years we've had people bring it to the surface and to try to stop it. It started coming to the surface, IIRC in the 70s and 80s, with legislation against child abuse in the 80s. I remember one of the few woman legislators coming out in support of a law because she herself had experienced it-it was the first time I realized I was far from alone. When I was a teen I picked up a book my Mom had-a trashy novel that had graphic descriptions of child rape. And in a lot of cases, rape was viewed as a sign of 'romance.' Remember the Luke and Laura storyline that was so popular in the 1980s? It started with Luke raping her. (Yes, I gave my Mom a piece of my mind about the book). And it really isn't surprising to me that the only person in jail for the Epstein activities is a woman. 1 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 hours ago, LaceyLou said: Unfortunately this has been going on for decades and likely centuries. The only difference is that in recent years we've had people bring it to the surface and to try to stop it. It started coming to the surface, IIRC in the 70s and 80s, with legislation against child abuse in the 80s. I remember one of the few woman legislators coming out in support of a law because she herself had experienced it-it was the first time I realized I was far from alone. When I was a teen I picked up a book my Mom had-a trashy novel that had graphic descriptions of child rape. And in a lot of cases, rape was viewed as a sign of 'romance.' Remember the Luke and Laura storyline that was so popular in the 1980s? It started with Luke raping her. (Yes, I gave my Mom a piece of my mind about the book). And it really isn't surprising to me that the only person in jail for the Epstein activities is a woman. yes, it's been going on forever. I know why sexual abuse is so prevalent in general. Men are taught at a very young age that that virility equals manhood. They abuse women at a young age and their peers won't say anything to discourage it because that wouldn't be "cool". And many men never grow out of it. It seems that not much has been done to change this over the years. I don't know why abuse of minors is so prevalent since that is not generally encouraged or accepted. I believe that ultra wealthy people do it BECAUSE it is so wrong. They get off on being able to get away with sick activity that others can't get away with. I don't know why it's also prevalent among other classes of people. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 9 hours ago, LaceyLou said: Unfortunately this has been going on for decades and likely centuries. The only difference is that in recent years we've had people bring it to the surface and to try to stop it. It started coming to the surface, IIRC in the 70s and 80s, with legislation against child abuse in the 80s. I remember one of the few woman legislators coming out in support of a law because she herself had experienced it-it was the first time I realized I was far from alone. When I was a teen I picked up a book my Mom had-a trashy novel that had graphic descriptions of child rape. And in a lot of cases, rape was viewed as a sign of 'romance.' Remember the Luke and Laura storyline that was so popular in the 1980s? It started with Luke raping her. (Yes, I gave my Mom a piece of my mind about the book). And it really isn't surprising to me that the only person in jail for the Epstein activities is a woman. The 70s was a very strange time in history during which children were routinely sexualized in popular culture, and there was even a movement afoot to make sex with children easier, such as lowering age of consent in New Jersey to 13—at the urging of the NOW, of all organizations. That was an actual thing. Quote
chasfh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) That Trump was a serial abuser of children is already baked into the Epstein files equation, such that if that was all there was on Trump in those files, it could be dismissed with some form of "so what who didn't". So there has to be more than just that in the files implicating Trump, something worse than "merely" sexually abusing children on a serial basis, as though something worse than that is even possible. So I am now coming around to the idea that Trump was an executive principal in the operation. He ran the thing with Epstein from the top. Not the paperwork, of course—that would have been Epstein's job. Maybe more like procurement, dispatch, and disposal. Edited 1 hour ago by chasfh Quote
Tiger337 Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago 1 hour ago, chasfh said: That Trump was a serial abuser of children is already baked into the Epstein files equation, such that if that was all there was on Trump in those files, it could be dismissed with some form of "so what who didn't". So there has to be more than just that in the files implicating Trump, something worse than "merely" sexually abusing children on a serial basis, as though something worse than that is even possible. So I am now coming around to the idea that Trump was an executive principal in the operation. He ran the thing with Epstein from the top. Not the paperwork, of course—that would have been Epstein's job. Maybe more like procurement, dispatch, and disposal. There is also a possibility that he was not actually involved, but needs to protect those who were because they have other dirt on him. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.