RedRamage

At the risk of getting labeled a Goff hater... The Lions right now don't have too many obvious, huge holes -- at least on paper. (We'll see if the paper stands up to the 2023 season.) But again, on paper there's not obvious huge holes that NEED to filled in the draft of the team will stink. So... we can, in theory, use a pick on a luxury item. We can "waste" a pick on a player who likely won't be contributing to the team this year without being a joke of a team. That's why we could but why should we? The reasoning for those who want to do it (for the record, I don't!) is two fold: First, we don't know if the 2022 Goff will be the 2023 Goff. Goff has had good season in his career, but he's also had bad season too. He hasn't exactly had a high level of consistent performance year to year to year. (There are many reasons for this and I'm sure others will tell me how I'm wrong to even suggest that Goff's past poor performance is his fault... let's just say that it isn't all his fault.) So if we can't count on Goff for 100% sure, we should be ready for his replacement. Second, if Goff does perform very well he could get very expensive, very soon. Let's say that 2023 Goff takes the Lions to the SB and then starts wanting a big contract extension but the Lions don't want to pay him. Going into the 2024 draft, they'll be picking number 31. Not too many franchise QBs will be available at that spot. However... at position 6 in the 2023 draft... maybe there is a franchise QB there. While we have the luxury of a pretty complete team, why not get that insurance that if Goff makes a huge money demand we aren't over a barrel where we can to pay him or suck with Nate Sudfeld as our starting QB in 2024? Taking a QB at 6 this year doesn't mean we can't have Goff in 2023 or 2024 or even beyond... it just gives us flexibility if Goff gets too expensive or if he regresses. And having a pretty complete team AND a second 1st round pick means we can absorb a pick that doesn't play in 2023.

Agreed... and I hope the Lions don't get into a bidding war... I mean, unless it's the Bears, Packers, or Vikings... then I want them to get into a bidding war then drop out at the last minute making one of those teams over pay.

Dear heavens... I want to see that website! Somewhat in GB's defense... they can't do a whole lot until the Rodgers situation gets resolved. And right now I think the Jets have the better hand. They can probably deal with not having Rodgers better than GB can in having Rodgers. Jets have other options at QB so they could still field a team. They could explain the situation to the fans a bit with: "We tried to trade for Rodgers... we gave a fair offer for an aging QB... but they won't negotiate with us in good faith." Compare that with GB who'll argue: "They didn't give us what we thought we should get so... now we're stuck with a QB who doesn't want to play for us that we're paying a huge amount of money to and who's value is dropping every week of the season." So GB's in a bad situation right now.

No idea if Anderson intended it this way, but I've always taken "40 games" as more of: "Wait until 1/4 of the season if over before any 'Hot Takes'." Which of course I've completely ignored by starting this whole thread.

Well, as I said... I do hope I'm wrong. I'll update this periodically and like I said I'll be extremely pleased if y'all can laugh at me in a few weeks or months for even thinking there is any similarity between the two years.

Here's another: 2003: alt.sports.baseball.detroit-tigers 2023: Motownforums.com

I sincerely hope that this is just yet another slow start for the Tigers. I sincerely hope that in a few weeks y'all will be making fun of me for even thinking that a thread like this tracking the two years was necessary. I really, really hope that... Through 9 games: 2003: 0-9, R = 9, RA = 14, pW/L = 1-8 2023: 2-7, R = 27, RA = 62, pW/L = 0-9 For Pythagorean Theorem, I'm using this formula from Baseball-Reference: W%=[(Runs Scored)^1.81]/[(Runs Scored)^1.81 + (Runs Allowed)^1.81]

That seems like way to little of a return for moving up to #3.

That was a very cool ceremonial opening pitch.

Yeah, I mean there's a million ways to try to over analyze this. Are the Bears a bigger name in Europe vs. the Lions? Is the NFL trying to show case Fields (definitely an electric player... questionable if he will be a long term NFL star, but certain electric and exciting to watch)? Is the NFL hoping to showcase the SB champs and give them an easier chance at a big victory on the international stage? Does the NFL think that the Lions will be an even bigger deal in 2024 so wants to showcase them internationally next year? How many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop?

Can't say I blame him. I mean he's got millions (assuming he's saved/invested some) already... probably more money than he needs for the rest of his life, and the NFL is brutal on player's bodies. I think it's also pretty admirable that he's announcing it way in advance (assume he doesn't change his mind) so that the Dolphins can plan appropriately. Now he is saying he'll play out his contract so it's not like if he retired in 2025 after his contact was up that the Dolphins would be left in a lurch, taken by surprise and scrambling to fill a hole, but still I think it's pretty cool to give lots and lots of notice so the Dolphins can play appropriately.

Yeah the mocked picks seem bad, but I liked the trade.

That seems like a lot for Simmons.

This is from: https://www.footballguys.com/article/2023-williams-mock-draft-2 I think I'd do that trade. Get a second 1st and 2nd rounder next year when there isn't a guy that I think is lock pick for the 6th pick right now. I don't love losing pick 81 but we would also get 119. Interestingly they have Carter falling all the way to 26. I don't think I'd mind the Lions taking a shot at Carter at 18 or 23 if it played out this way. FWIW, they have the Lions taking Brian Branch (S) at 18 and Drew Sanders (LB) at 23.

Darn good thing we got Boyd out of there isn't it?

Yeah, I mean I guess... I don't see it working personally. I don't see a GM at the 8-10 range going: "Oh man, he dropped to me and he's supposed to be a clear cut top 10? Well, then I'm grabbing him!" What I do see happening is teams in the 11-15 range going: "He's an undeniable talent, but I'm worried about the red flags. Sure wish I had an opportunity to interview him one on one to try to answer some of those questions. Without that chance I just not sure I'm gonna take a flier on him."

So that's what Carter was doing between the Combine and pro-day...

I know there's a limit on how many players a team can bring in, but there isn't a limit on how many teams a player can visit, is there? I'm trying to understand the move here as I'm sure it's coming from the agent, not from Carter himself. I mean, I suppose it's possible Carter is calling this shot, but I can't see any agent agreeing to that unless s/he thought it was a good idea too. The only thing I can think of is that they're trying to play like Carter's stock isn't dropping or in jeopardy from the various things that have happened. Like: "Yeah, we're so confident that we're going in the top 10, there's no need to even talk to anyone else." Personally this seems like a super stupid move by Carter's agent. This feels like it's coming off as arrogant. I think Carter visiting a bunch of teams and having good interviews with them would be a way to really raise his stock and maybe get a team to trade up for him if he starts to slip a bit. I wonder if the agent is worried that Carter won't interview well?

I think you'd have to be a very cold hearted person to not second guess the whole incident and at least feel some remorse, justified or not. However, I would expect that to have effected him more when it happened. Two months later I don't expect to see super lingering feelings. I do think it is possible that him getting charged with doing something wrong effected him mentally, and this might have played some part into his poor pro-day workout. That said, if it did play a part that doesn't excuse his pro-day... it might explain it and again if that is what happened it's one more data point to put into the equation when you try to calculate who Carter actually is.

Alright, I see a lot of smack talk going around re: Carter and think many of y'all are being way to black and white on this. There's a possibility that: 1. Carter is just a kid who made some dumb mistakes, but the consequence of those mistakes are sitting so heavy on him right now. He's learned his lesson is a horrible way and he just hasn't been able to concentrate on football matters much, which explains being out of shape for his pro-day. But as I said he's learned his lesson, he's on the straight and narrow now and really to prove all the high drafts on him are right, just give him the chance. 2. Carter has gotten by on talent alone and assumed everything would just fall in place naturally for him. He just never figured any drinking and drive would lead to any danger and it's just dumb bad luck that the other people died. He's entitled and letting all the draft talk go to his head and just expecting to be a top 10 pick and rake in the dough. Of course, the reality is that probably both #1 and #2 are wrong and really it's somewhere in the middle. That's were we need the people making the big bucks to be looking into him and digging up whatever bits they can to paint the most accurate picture on Carter. I honestly don't know where Carter falls between 1 and 2. If you can place him at 1.3 or less, I'd probably be happy to take a flyer on him. If it's more like 1.6 or higher... then I'd say pass. And now you're asking: "This ain't news to any of us... what's your point?" My point is stop talking in absolutes. Recognize that it's possible there are enough red flags that Holmes/Campbell know that we don't that they aren't going to draft him, even if he's top tier talent. Recognize also that Holmes/Campbell have a lot more info than we do and it may be good enough for them to risk drafting him.

I'm SHOCKED... just SHOCKED.

It could be they want Carter and so by leaking this news they are trying to make it look like even the Raiders are so worried about his character that someone like the Lions, who usually avoid character issue guys, should really stay away. In other words trying to keep people ahead of the Raiders from drafting him. It could be that the Raiders are trying to make it look more like they'll be drafting the guy that teams after them are targeting. If a QB falls past the Lions and Carter is still on the board if you don't think the Raiders are going to draft Carter and you do want that QB, you might try to trade up for fear the Raiders take the QB. Are either of these things likely to massively sway an opposing front office to make the do what you want them too? Probably not. But if a front office was close to doing something anyway this might be the nudge that pushes them in the right direction for you... and it costs you absolutely nothing, so why not try?

I will believe this only when (if?) Carter is available at 7 and the Raider pass on him. This very well may be a true story but this is the time of year where one could never take any comments coming out of an NFL front office at face value. I think it's just as likely that this is misinformation intentionally leaked vs. real info that slipped... heck, it's probably more likely that it was intentionally leaked.