Jump to content

4hzglory

Members
  • Posts

    632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

4hzglory last won the day on July 25

4hzglory had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

4hzglory's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Posting Machine
  • Very Popular
  • One Year In
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well

Recent Badges

197

Reputation

  1. McKinstry won also for Utility
  2. If they were even truly available, Holmes clearly felt they weren't upgrades over what they already have or in Zitler's case, wasn't a fit as he only plays RG and they aren't going to move Ratledge this year.
  3. He was used as an example of a starting tackle who was traded in recent years. And yes he was a starter, but as MB said, he isn't an upgrade over Skipper. And they clearly think who they already have as backups and on the PS are equal or better than the options that were out there. Both on the OLine and DLine. And after the Tampa game, they clearly felt like that with the DB's. I believe if they saw a clear upgrade over what they had, they would have made a trade. But if they're just trading a 6th round pick to get a player equal or worse in their minds than the backups they have, why would they do that? They got their starting guard (who just got hurt) in the 6th (not to mention a guard they really like in Frazier who Holmes said he would have taken in the 3rd if they didn't trade up to get Teslaa.)
  4. I agree. I’d sign Bichette long term and worry about any logjam later. Torres I love for a year, but more than that would be iffy.
  5. It’s usually the players like Torres who see their offers diminished the most by a QO. It obviously isn’t going to affect Tucker/Bregman/Bichette
  6. It doesn’t come directly from them, but they lose a pick. Depending on what their luxury tax status/revenue sharing status is, determines which round of a pick(and if they lose 2)they lose and if they also lose International signing bonus money. Depending on what he would sign for, we get either a pick after the 1st round (if his total deal is over $50 mil) or after the 2nd round(if it’s under $50 mil)
  7. With the QO attached, it could be an issue for him. With no QO, I think he definitely gets at least 3 yes 45-50 mil. It will be interesting to see what he does.
  8. Which is basically what Stewart has been this year. (SSS alert)
  9. By comparison, of the regulars, that is only below Robinson who is 40.4%. 3rd is Green at 35%
  10. Small sample size, (but not as small as 2 possessions in 1 game) but Stewart is shooting 39.3% so far on 3.5 3 point shots/game. It seems based on that he should keep shooting.
  11. I think besides the YouTube issue, it was also who ND played and the expected quality of the game. As you say, when ND played Miami and A&M they both were top 20 watched games of the first half.
  12. True-I was going off of the comment that started this topic which was suggesting 1 yr contracts after 4 years of control. i have no problem with 5 - 7 year limits.
  13. Amen! Why would we be in any different position than the Mariners who we were 1 base hit away of beating in a 5 game series.
  14. The one aspect from a fan's standpoint I wouldn't like is that you would likely see completely different teams year by year. I'd have to think jersey sales would plummet as you wouldn't know if your favorite player is going to be on your team next year or another team.
  15. It's very very likely Decker and Sewell play. Decker hasn't practiced on Wednesday all season. And Sewell was working off to the side, (and see MB's post that he feels good and expects to play)
×
×
  • Create New...