Jump to content

Longgone

Members
  • Posts

    1,031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Longgone

  1. It’s okay, stick with your baseless agenda. it’s fine to be critical of someone, but it’s better to deal in reality rather than just bitter venom.
  2. This is pure ignorance. No one is signing anything, until it is done. You want to blame Harris, yet you got nothing. The agent was trying to squeeze the Dodgers, they wouldn’t meet the abrupt, last second demands, no blame for them?
  3. Harris never blamed anyone or made any excuses. And no one puts these things in writing, it just isn’t how things are done, generally things are done with integrity, because reputations linger forever. No agent is going to sign off on any leverage they may have until a deal is in place.
  4. He did, and the agent turned around and ****** him at the last minute, reneging on an agreed upon deal.
  5. This is true of most any player at any time; if you get the right offer, you make the trade.
  6. Probably all but Siebert and Davis
  7. Actually, if the first two happen, they would probably acquire an actual first baseman.
  8. If Keith can hit like a first baseman and play a below average second base, leave him at second. If he can’t quite hit like a solid first baseman, then it would be stupid to move him there. If he doesn’t at all have the hands or movements of an infielder, for heaven’s sake, don’t assume he can handle first.
  9. Hey, if he can hit like a first baseman and play second base at all, leave him alone!
  10. Yes, sorry, I was overreacting to others
  11. If you want the opportunity for a future star player, you’ll target top minor leaguers, if you’ll settle for mediocrity, then insist on only major leaguers, because no one is giving up a star major league player. Sure, there’s more risk, but build the team with highly competitive players, not average ones.
  12. I could see them falling for a Theo Gillen, for the bat.
  13. A) Pro rankings often differ from media rankings. B) Fangraphs rankings are often a little wonky. C) Waldschmidt is an ascending player and climbing the boards.
  14. Mayo won’t cut the mustard, except as a secondary piece.
  15. You are not going to get an elite pitcher unless you are willing to give up elite prospects. Kjerstad won’t cut it.
  16. Not if you keep it refrigerated.
  17. The best thing that could happen to MLB would be for them to take over all the broadcasting rights.
  18. I believe Hinch is one of the top managers in the game and the Tigers are lucky to have him, but fans of every franchise routinely despise and second guess their managers, especially when that team is losing, so here we are.
  19. That’s not exactly true. The facilities, training, nutrition, have improved, but the quality of play? No
  20. He can hit. He has the ability. Does he need to make some adjustments, sure. Will he? Who knows.
  21. No that’s still awful
  22. These are athletes, they’ve been competing their whole lives. They thrive on it or they fade away. And this is how you build a system, you accumulate a pipeline of talent where you have to compete hard for jobs, and if you’re good at it, enough will make it to field a competitive core. Most won’t make it, but you keep the pipeline coming.
  23. I understand this is your opinion, it just has no basis in reality. It would have no effect on Tork, would not change anyone’s opinion of his value or availability, and it surely shouldn’t have any impact on draft strategy. No one cares about crap like that. Kuntz is likely a couple of years away, and if they both reach their ceilings that would be a fortuitous scenario and they’d make it work.
  24. Name one 1b only prospect in the system.
  25. Hypothetically, if both Tork and Kuntz end up 900 ops guys that would be awesome, they’ll find a place for them. In any case Kuntz is probably 2-3 years from helping, so a lot can happen. But I do agree with Chas on one thing, the odds of the Tigers drafting Kuntz are low, but it won’t be because of Tork.
×
×
  • Create New...