Jump to content

gehringer_2

Members
  • Posts

    25,631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    192

Posts posted by gehringer_2

  1. 38 minutes ago, buddha said:

    i dont know, but soderblom didnt do jack here and now that he's in pittsburgh he's playing physical and scoring.  sooooo....

    IDK, I always thought he at least made the other team aware he was on the ice, which is more than most RW forwards achieve. I would have liked to have seen them given him more run.

  2. 41 minutes ago, buddha said:

    i dont know, but soderblom didnt do jack here and now that he's in pittsburgh he's playing physical and scoring.  sooooo....

    I've often had the feeling in recent years that the Wings are a team where players come to get worse. So do they have really poor coaching and development people? I don't think TM is a bad NHL coach, but guys are not exactly blossoming under his coaching when they come up here either. Does Yzerman have a toxic philosophy about how to manage young players that has been enforced by him only hiring coaches that share the view and they are all just wrong?

    An org that can't progress has to make changes if that is going to change. I get that there are a lot of reasons CI is going to be slow to fire SY, but I can at still hope Ilitch would at least tell Yzerman that it's time to turn over his staff if he wants to remain the guy in charge. They just are not accomplishing anything more than 'about average' and you can't get better with that FO performance level.

  3. 7 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

    That’s on Hinch.  Flaherty should have been on a short leash to start the inning.

    He and Harris are off to a rough start to the season.  

    Jack is a guy I'd like to see Hinch give a less rope than he usually does. Sure he works his way out sometimes, but I think the probability of an inning going south for Jack in a hurry is high enough I'd be willing to give up the times he gets out  of it. Esp when he's at his third or 4th jam.

    • Like 1
  4. On 4/3/2026 at 10:22 AM, Jason_R said:

    I stumbled across this site which shows ice time for various line combinations: https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/

    Just for grins I looked up Marco Kasper. People talk about a sophomore slump but last year he spent almost half his even strength ice time with Larkin/Raymond or Kane/Debrincat. This season he spent less than a quarter of his even strength ice time with them. This is not so much a sophomore slump as it is the obvious consequence of pairing a kid with linemates who are replacement level or worse. 

    It goes both ways though. I remember when playing with Pavel Datsyuk earned Abdelkater a contract that we found out was a mistake once Pavel went back to Russia. If he's not good enough to be at least somewhat productive without a lot of help  then he's probably not a building block.

  5. 58 minutes ago, chasfh said:

    Not only that, but if you play each position enough, your brain can map out the difference between needing a certain-sized glove at one position versus a different-size glove at another, even if the difference is a fraction of an inch, basically because of the thousands and thousands of balls you have fielded at each.

    easy to assume, more difficult to prove. I'd be interested to see some controlled work that shows how well the brain actually does avoid crossing itself up. You certainly do see the issue in industrial safety incidents where context has changed.

  6. 47 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

    Not sure—but the idea of an outdoor Minnesota baseball stadium has always struck me as dumb.

    Summer evenings in the Twin Cities are pretty nice. Sure you are at risk at the beginning and end of the season but the rest of the summer outside is a pretty nice payoff. They could have tried for retractable but they didn't have the room at that site, the $$ probably weren't available, and the easiest retractable designs are open air so they don't keep in heat which is probably a bigger issue than precipitation.

  7. 20 minutes ago, Jason_R said:

    Yes, but one of the challenges for a young defenseman is learning how to assert yourself offensively while remaining responsible defensively. It is exciting to see him flash that skill though. 

    It's not only the Dmen learning when to do it. It's also the whether team supports it. I think one of the great failings of the Wings as team is that their two big D men are two of the best puck possession talents on the team, but the lack of ability of the wing's forwards as a group to rotate and back check in any useful way means the Wings can never let those two play to their full potential. McLellan has them playing a little freer, but not all that much. Of course you generally need speed and size in your forwards for them to be good 200 ft players (even if DeBrincat is the exception) .....

  8. 21 minutes ago, chasfh said:

    Yes, you definitely need a shorter glove at short and second to ease the ball transfer during plays, especially double plays. Sure, you need to do something similar at third but not as often because SS and 2B gets way more chances to transfer than 3B, and the extra inch is more important for a more stationary position like 3B. In the middle of the dirt guys rely on their range more than their reach or their reflexes.

    I don't argue the idea that there is an optimum glove for each position, what I'm speculating about is how well the brain  copes with using two different gloves that are relatively close to each other from day to day. Seems like you are working against your brain's ability to key into 'knowing' the glove as an extension of your hand. If you are going from an IF to and OF glove, that's a big difference, less chance of mental 'template' confusion I would think. But I wonder about the ability to mentally resolve a relatively small difference as successfully under pressure. The idea being that if you are charging to scoop a slow roller and your brain has got the wrong finger length dialed in -> probability increase for booted ball?

     

  9. 2 hours ago, oblong said:

    What I mean by a legal document is the law can’t come after you.  Poor choice of words. It’s not a criminal act to “break” one. Nobody will arrest you.  If you sign one and I thjnk you break it by only course of action is to sue. I can’t call the cops or city hall. 

    Right - a corporate NDA can only lead at most to a civil suit. If you are dealing with classified information you are subject to criminal sanctions under various Federal Statutes. FTM even if you never signed anything!

×
×
  • Create New...