Edman85

Yep, why that was interesting.

Funny thing is I thought the same thing about another ginger who was in movies around the same time: Jeffrey Jones.

On the topic of TV people being creeps, the NYT had a story on the Frugal Gourmet and a documentary that came out detailing his accusers today. I went to his wikipedia and noticed it was very sanitized. There are several people working on his behalf in the edit discussion trying to keep the allegations off the page. It was interesting to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jeff_Smith_(chef)

I always got creep vibes from him for some reason. Ah, I see he had an incident in 1994, pre-internet.

Additionally, just looking at raw stats, it takes like 1,000 PA vs. LHP for any split to be meaningful. With swing path analysis now, teams may be able to detect something faster now vs. different pitch shapes or use Kinetrax or something similar to help a player learn to hit the opposite hand. But you can do that in the cage, not in the game.

Mlb and NHL likely have different rules for arbitration.

Bryan Sammons back on a minor league deal. Which is surely going to upset some idiots...

Fargo Season 6 could be interesting if it ever happens...

Wait, renovating a Government building is illegal?

My brother had a similar story about a friend.

Why is it that it is generally accepted that chiropractors are legitimate doctors and not pseudoscientific quacks?

There ya go. Half the schedule is in a state where there isn't much benefit, perhaps a net negative, to the athlete to defer.

Michigan's jock tax must not be that extreme, especially at the salaries the Tigers are paying. It is an income tax and luxury tax dodge, so there hasn't been much need.

I do feel like criticizing a move because the one doing the criticizing hasn't heard of the player signed is more of a self own than a legit criticism of the move. I don't mean that to call out MCS, but it's been something that has perturbed me for 30 or so years at this point, and a very common talk radio/talking head talking point that has never made sense to me. Notoriety isn't correlated with ability, and it is an admission of some degree of ignorance, which in a rational world would weaken the argument.

If they offer a fair offer, the player won't say no because of a reputation of being cheap. It will be because the offer itself is cheap.