Graterol

Who replaces Javy? 1B: Tork 2B: Torres 3B: Lee/Keith SS: McGonigle RF: Perez/Workman or Jung CF: Vierling/Perez LF: Greene DH: Jones/Carp Only real options I see making sense would be Workman or Jung to play RF against righties. Jung is on the 40 and Workman isn’t, so he probably gets the nod. Clark would obviously fit the roster better, but don’t see that happening. Julks to play RF against lefties seems like a waste of roster spot. Mckinstry still a few weeks away.

No but what does wenceel perez have to do to lose playing time? Didn’t hit 2H last year, nor in spring, nor this year. Julks or Workman probably need a shot. Perez never had a track record as a hitter so not sure why his rope is so long. one silver lining is unlike last years roster, there should be an easy upgrade to find a league average OFer if meadows doesn’t come back or Clark doesn’t get promoted.

Guessing Rainer promotion was just to open a spot for Yost (not due to merit).

Anderson needs to go to Toledo when Verlander is back.

Doesn’t seem like he would get claimed nor would he declare free agency. So probably should be done. Peripherals are bad.

How does this work? Can he be sent down to AAA? I assume he would receive full salary?

That EV is concerning even if the approach is better. SSS caveat, etc.

I have had this theory that McKinstry is a sleeper to be traded because his versatility doesn’t matter as much with McGonigle at short, a left handed heavy lineup, and Javy able to play IF and CF against LHP. I asked chat gpt to derive the ideal lineup vs RHP and LHP using historical wrc+ splits (or last year in certain cases if it made more sense). Used a rough adjustment for defense. The conclusion was that to optimize each lineup McKinstry would be off the roster. If you add a constraint that each starter rests 15pct of the time, McKinstry would be in and Perez out. To me that seems logical and given Perez has options, it seems to be the most likely scenario. But I do think this team is missing a LH hitting corner outfielder with a big platoon split. Best case scenario would be to package some combination of Jung, Lee, McKinstry, Perez, etc to get such a player…

The problem is that Javy’s revival last year still wasn’t very good. Against RHP, Javy had a 75 wrc+ last year. Meadows was 83 last year and 97 for his career. I think Meadows is absolutely a platoon OFer at this point, and Vierling or Javy should play CF against LHP. I would also be open to an upgrade on Meadows (maybe even Vierling full time in CF). But I don’t think we should expect any better results from Javy with the bat compared to Meadows. And a handful of spring training at bats doesn’t really change that.

Still think it’s probably not going to happen, but if McGonigle makes the team who is displaced? In that scenario, I think locks are: tork/torres/mcgonigle/keith/dingler greene/carp mckinstry/baez/vierling/rogers So last two spots could be: meadows and jones (meadows platoon with vierling or javy, McKinstry plays lots of OF) meadows and Perez (vierling is rh platoon with carp) jones and Perez (javy is regular CF) I think Perez would be left off with meadows on a short leash, but I could see any of these options.

Skubal/Valdez/Olson/Flaherty/Mize and don’t think it’s much of a fight. Caveat being there is almost never a time where 1 SP isn’t injured. Anderson takes long RP role and spot starter. Jansen/Vest/Finnegan/Holton/Hurter. Hannifee probably favorite for last spot but lots of options. I would think this means Melton and Montero go to AAA to stretch out.

For that price would have rather used that money towards a legit bat or frontline starter. Not a fan.

Assuming no more moves and good health, rotation would be Skubal, Flaherty, Olson, mize, Anderson. Locks in pen would be Vest, Finnegan, Jensen, Melton (or swap with Anderson), Holton, Hurter. Still would love another pitcher or 2 but doesn’t look horrible.

0.6 WAR and 4.0 FIP. Don’t mind it so long as $6 mil or less.

I like the proposal or some variation. Limiting shifts and pitch clock have worked. Finding a way to get more balls in play would help the game. Athletic CF still would make plays and would be equally valuable relative to their peer groups.