romad1

Smerconish is actually starting his broadcast by attacking US for not sending troops to Ukraine.

The Russians are working on a lot of new tech things that will not advance without direct intervention of China. if China helps them it will mean China is violating the sanctions regime and will trigger some things against China that Wal-Mart, GM, Ford (is Ford still heavily in china?) and the rest of the Global Economy won't like.

They did that!? Good job Erdogan you vicious killer.

We've all seen this. Excellent propaganda from the 2014 era I recall

I have an observation that my colleagues and I shared today. Has anyone seen any reference to UAVs on either side? If so, its escaped my very extensive review of available information. The US government armed the first UAV in like 1996. The use of uavs in the recent Azerbaijan/Armenia conflict was DECISIVE and you would think Russia would have learned that lesson. There are many possible reasons. I have a couple of technical reasons I cannot share here. The modern warfare dog that didn't bark thus far.

As facacta as Rubio has been…he has been good in this war.

fascinating

Also, the UK is essentially gravitationally locked culturally with India beyond just their predilection for drunken vindaloo

The value India provides is beyond their armed forces. They occupy key territory

Yeah, I think upon reflection. This was a pretty bad body check by our future ally in the quasi-democracy alliance.

They are abstaining. It’s better than nothing

India...you want to join us in the anti-China Quad...this is part of that.

The UN needs to be reengineered

Wont someone please think of the gamblers?

I just don't see this yet

Tucker is different category from Hannity. he's clearly in one of the black books in the safe at Trump Tower and Dzerzinsky Square

Apparently NATO SC will be sending more weapons

The dutch angle reminded me of the Batman tv show

id-russia.pdf (fas.org) Useful guide to Russian vehicles. That confirms that the vehicle that smashed the car was SA-13 (or derivations) family of AA missile launcher.

Wow

This. Except if you deliberately adopt the language of the oppressors as part of some sort of affinity with the bastards

Anti-aircraft system it appears.

As always...be careful projecting and be dispassionate when considering anything likely to be biased like this. The RAF didn't have nearly the success the BBC said it had in September 1940 but it still won and it also won because the British government through the BBC kept the World and the British people in the fight.

Dude is lucky not to be pink mist

Stalin once famously asked how many divisions did the Pope have Still, moral condemnation beats silence.