Tiger337

Just now, mtutiger said:

My point still stands. He's widely despised in the broader public, and The Big Club that you speak of, the guys like Bezos and Cook and Musk, would all prefer that he weren't

I don't think they care that much.  They will still drive policy in the United States and make billions one way of the other once he is gone.  They always do.  I think he is probably easier for them to manipulate, but they can still get what they want.  

Just now, mtutiger said:

I think the public takes it more seriously than you think (he's getting -25 to -30 polls for a reason). But The Big Club wields a big stick, and they would prefer we all just shut up about it.

Sure, they don't like him, but the disapproval rating of congress is even worse.  A lot worse.  They don't trust anybody.  

https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx

2 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

1000%. Tired of having to pretend that the behavior observed out of both sides of the political spectrum with my own eyes and ears are the same. It just isn't.

It's not the same, but I think the left cried wolf too many times and now that we have a real problem, not enough people take it seriously.  They think it's still Clinton vs Bush.  

18 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I think The Big Club would much more prefer it if those who disapproved of Donald Trump would just shut up about it.

What they don't want is for everybody to start pointing fingers at them instead.  

6 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

I'm sorry, but treating the current breakdown in American political culture and the violent undertones of it as being completely symmetrical is a bunch of hooey. There is one party that is led by a leader that sicced a mob on the capitol, there is one party that is led by a leader that blanket pardoned all of the people involved, has legitimized groups like the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, etc. 

I understand the tendency to want to see things from both sides and all.... but on this particular subject, it's wildly asymmetrical and oughtta be treated as such. And the fact that we treat "both sides" as if they are "the same" on this only emboldens more bad behavior.

LOL, studies have shown that the right is more violent, but you can't deny that us versus them among lower classes is exactly what The Big Club wants.  

The right hates the left and thinks it is dangerous.  The left hates the right and thinks it is dangerous.  This is a perfect scenario for The Big Club and the politicians which support it.  

I was just reading where the average MLB player has 20/12 to 20/13 vision.  80% have better than 20/15 vision.  

6 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

I’m still aboard the “trade Riley before the end of his contract because he seems like a player that’s going to age very poorly” boat

Torkelson I have no issue with.  If he’s not hitting, he will get less ABs.  His defense is steady, and he isnt likely going to force us into either a long term deal or a must-trade scenario in the future.

It seems like outfielders don't bring back a lot in trades unless they are superstars, so I suspect they'll hold onto Greene and Carpenter into 2028.  Same with Torkelson.  All three can help them win over the next couple of years.  I dom't expect any of them to last beyond that.  Hopefully, they will have enough young players in place at the end of 2028 so that they have a strong core.   

Are we still hating Riley Greene and Spencer Torkelson?  I just want to know.  

8 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

Or they could just trade Hinch. 

HINCH AND FLARRITY FOR ABREU AND CROCHETT

1 hour ago, chasfh said:

I can accept the idea that the Reds were so bad during that era that they had to somehow identify the tallest midget to honor, but if it was the steroids era’s fault that they had no choice but to honor a four-plus ERA, at least his ERA+ would be closer to 115 or 120 than 103.

His stretch between 2005-2007 was pretty good:

ERA+ 112 124 124

WAR 4.5 5.3 6.0

1 hour ago, mtutiger said:

I don't buy the conspiracies surrounding this and continue to believe this administration is too incompetent to actually execute anything elaborate that is often attributed to them in times like these.

Having said that, hard not to find a bit of dark amusement that all these people who have worked diligently to lower trust throughout greater society and exploited it gleefully while campaigning for power now find themselves distrusted by many people now that they themselves have power.

They both (this one and the one in Butler) looked fake, and if any administration was going to do two fake assassination attempts, it would be this one, but I don't think they were staged.  A staged assassination attempt requires too many people to be on board and I think somebody would leak it. Someone got killed in the first one and don't think they would be able to get everyone on board with murder.  Nobody got killed in this one (not yet), but I still don't believe everyone would be on board.  

5 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Wait, why is the idea of Hinch leaving the Tigers and going to Boston showing up in multiple threads all of a sudden? I do a search on the idea and there is zero coming up about it. Where is this chatter originating?

It all comes from the same person

6 minutes ago, mtutiger said:

Suffice to say, this appears like a significant breakdown in security.

Need to fire some women and Blacks.  

2 minutes ago, chasfh said:

He’s going to come back and blame the media for this, isn’t he? The leftist media that hates him and wants him dead, or some such nonsense?

He's not coming back.  He is pretending to want to come back, but is letting law enforcement make the decision.  

6 hours ago, Shades of Deivi Cruz said:

That’s not a real photo

The real video was just as bad though.  

4 minutes ago, SeattleMike said:

He's not under contract for next year, is he?

no,  last year was the year he got 25 million.  This is the year he is sucking up another 20 million...so far.  

Did Chas miss a joke that flew right over his head?  

You can't predict bullpens.  That's why you still need to build around starters which is what the Tigers have mostly done.  The bullpen needs to do better than this though.  

On 2/4/2026 at 4:21 PM, gehringer_2 said:

Trump isn't stupid, but he is ignorant. We tend to assume the later always implies the former, but not with Trump.

Trump is ignorant because not because he is stupid but because he has a closed mind. Snapped shut somewhere around 1972 and he's still there.

He has no intellect at all.  He is smart enough to know how to bully and manipulate people which I think isn't all that difficult when you've got money.  He is also dumb enough to allow smarter people to manipulate him.  

I was watching the game on youtube TV.  The Tigers were leading 4-0.  I went to get a quick snack and Baez was at the plate when I came back.  This was weird because that would have been three batters batting in like one minute. Baez then crushed a home run to center field and I am thinking it was a flashback to earlier in the inning.  But it wasn't.  The game had gone back in time to Baez's previous at bat.  YouTube TV is weird.  Either that or that was quite a snack.  

20 minutes ago, guy incognito said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/us-is-adding-firing-squads-electrocution-and-gassing-to-federal-execution-methods/ar-AA21EFN2

What do they intend to accomplish here?  

4 hours ago, chasfh said:

Ending a Yordan Alvarez segment, Brian Kenny/MLB Now did a twitter poll on their show yesterday asking viewers who they thought the most underrated players in baseball today are, and the first two responses were Dingler. 

By definition, he is now no longer underrated!

4 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

I would assume that rule assumes  the catcher is out of play when the ball gets stuck in his apparatus? 

There had to be rule of course, but that doesn't mean I have to think it's a good one. It's a much simpler rule book if the batter is just out if the ball hasn't touched the ground. The problem with that is you know it would get abused and pretty soon guys would show up in the field with big bags of fabric around their arms or the like.

But the ball getting trapped in a uniform has been ruled to be a deadball. If that happened in foul territory, it still would not be an out according to the rule.  

In the catcher example, if the ball did not get lodged in the mask and instead the catcher just didn't catch the ball on a third strike, the batter would be allowed to run to first.  This sounds to me analagous to what happened in Gilbert's case.  

7 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

Really it all comes down to not making outs. 

Bill James used to preach that. Every team gets the same number of outs every game and more you limit them the more opportunities you will have to produce runs.