-
Posts
7,917 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by MichiganCardinal
-
They didn’t disable their phones, my understanding is that it was taken in the search warrant. I haven’t seen anything that says they were near Oxford for three nights, but I could be wrong on that I’m at a bar for the UM game and didn’t look it up. Either way, they couldn’t be home while a search warrant was executed and the media was an absolute circus, let alone the death threats they were getting. Their attorney said in open court that they were going to turn themselves in the next day at 7:30am. Shannon Smith is not going to put her career on the line for these two.
-
Hate is very strong. I definitely have an inherent distrust though. Per the arraignment (I can’t find a recording or direct quote), their attorney was in constant contact with the clients throughout Thursday, and planned to meet them at 52-3 Court at 7:30am Saturday. Yes I believe that. If the parent or bartender provided a minor with alcohol they’re guilty of a crime notwithstanding what else happened. Different. Here, the parents were not guilty of a crime (or at least have not been charged) except that their kid took the gun out of the home and did what he did.
-
I said within that I did not know if it would be found to be involuntary manslaughter, and closed with saying it would be intriguing to follow. I am not standing on some pedestal saying that the parents are innocent and should be released at once, I'm saying that I don't know if this has ever been done before (going after the parents of a child perpetrator criminally), and that there is a strong defense to be made on that basis alone, irrespective of the evidence one way or the other. If they wanted to go to Canada, or Florida, or Mexico, or virtually anywhere in the World, they were free to do so until about 2:00pm on Friday when the judge signed the warrant. If they planned to, why would they have hung out a 30-minute drive from the jail where they now sit? Based on the defense attorney's statements in the parents arraignment, McDonald was intentionally deceitful with the public in order to incite a manhunt. At the very least, she chose to wait until Friday afternoon to announce charges she likely knew would be brought at least 24 hours prior. I'm not willing to give her office the benefit of the doubt.
-
Watching Cincinnati, I think they would struggle mightily against a quality defense. They flew down the field without issue and then completely lost their identity in the Red Zone and stagnated. Then missed a chip shot field goal with their 3rd kicker of the year. I didn't want to be anecdotal, so I looked up their RZ efficiency on the year and they're 93rd in FBS at 0.797, between Temple and Arizona State.
-
I agree with this. If there is an impartial jury of peers (or two) to be found in Oakland County, I think the defense has a really strong case here. Holding parents criminally liable for their child's actions is a very slippery slope, and I don't know if there is any precedent. They were negligent without a doubt in my mind, and would almost certainly be found responsible for damages in a civil suit. Did they commit involuntary manslaughter though? I'm not sure. Say someone has a kid who is 15-17, mentally ill, but usually good at hiding it and very resistant to medication or therapy. Parent goes to the corner store for something one day and the kid has a mental breakdown, grabs a knife from the block in the kitchen, and kills someone who is just walking their dog down the street. Is that parent criminally responsible for their child's actions? They didn't force the child to be seen by a mental health professional after all. They left the child without supervision. They didn't secure their knives. Keep in mind that with no weapons charges being filed, that likely means they broke no laws as it comes to storing the weapon (which is infuriating in its own right, but also a separate conversation from whether the Crumbley parents are guilty). It will be an intriguing case to follow.
-
I would guess 75% or more of people who come into trouble with the law on any given day have past run-ins with the law. Prior to the Waukesha Parade incident, he was charged in the prior incident with Obstructing a Police Officer, 2nd Degree Reckless Endangerment, Disorderly Conduct, Battery, and Bail Jumping. The incident itself came from the mother of one of his children calling police and stating that he had tried to run her over, displaying to police a tire mark on her pant leg. A much more standard incident for police contact than the high-profile ones that have been talked about extensively here. Say that Waukesha never happened, that Brooks pled not guilty to those charges, went to trial, and evidence came out that completely exonerated him. This was a vindictive ex and video from across the street that the police didn't see in their investigation shows the woman rubbing her leg against a tire after he's left, and it's not clear that he hit her at all. These are all things that might not be known at arraignment, but could certainly come out at trial. If he had been denied bond or given an outrageous bond that a low-income individual such as himself could never afford, that means that he sat incarcerated for months awaiting this trial, for having done absolutely nothing wrong (in this incident at least). What he ultimately did was tragic, without a doubt, and the world would be a better place now if he had been denied bond. That doesn't mean that we should be reactionary and now more harshly punish every future person who walks through the doors of a courtroom accused of violating a law. Accusations are only accusations, and people are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. It also doesn't mean that if his bond was higher but still affordable with collateral (say $10k) that it wouldn't have happened.
-
Oklahoma State had seven opportunities in the 4th quarter to get a TD from inside the 2 and couldn't capitalize. Ended on a stretch to the pylon that came up inches short. Baylor wins. Have to think Notre Dame has the inside track to the playoff now, along with Georgia, Michigan, and Cincy.
-
The Big 12 is putting on an ugly display on National TV. OK State's QB Spencer Sanders is 19/31, 160 yds, 0 TDs, 4 INTs. ... And Baylor muffs a punt. Neither team wants this.