KnoxP
-
Posts
155 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Posts posted by KnoxP
-
-
1 hour ago, djhutch said:
I try to be a realist when it comes to the Lions - We've all been burnt so many times - but I cannot for the life of me figure out why some people do nothing but bitch about this team. The hyperbole is beyond ridiculous & the fact that when things are going well you hear CRICKETS .. 1 bad thing & they're the worst team in history. Why follow a team that makes you like this? & if you like the team, for crying out loud SHOW IT ONCE!
My only explanation is that it is a show. How extreme can the post be, then go farther. There is no reasonable reason to expect otherwise, but I have also heard “you can’t reason with the unreasonable “…evidence above.
The ignore function seems to work well.
-
13 hours ago, number20 said:
Will the Lions win this game? I'll predict they....
..."somehow find a way not to lose" 😁
I’ll take it!
-
9 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:
Especially since they lost to the Lions and only scored 20 on an Aaron Glenn defense.
I said in an earlier post somewhere, Philadelphia and SF are the best 2 right now and SF just took a big leap fwd. The Lions are among a large group of next tier teams. I’m expecting every week to be a fight from here on. While 21-0 turning into 33-28 doesn’t feel great, they did enough and l’ll take the W with a smile.
- 1
-
Been fun for a while, time to check out.
-
1 minute ago, Motor City Sonics said:
Please go up 21 to 0
And don’t let up!
-
6 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said:
Fumble on the snap. Wow, Jared's a mess.
FWIW, looked like Ragnow was late to snap the ball, everyone was moving before he did.
-
37 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:
In regards to the fake punt, I don't necessarily think GB was expecting it but more so that they happened to be lined up perfectly to stop it. ...
Also I don't buy into the not being able to sneak up on teams anymore. We were one of the most hyped teams all offseason who won 8 of 9 to end the year. Then went and beat the defending champs in their place, that is more than enough for teams to start talking you seriously....
On the punt we may be splitting hairs. Expecting it vs. 'hey this may be', not being surprised can yield the same result. Was lined up perfectly just a happy accident or did GB lineup in case?
I love DC and his boldness, it has served well. Teams are prepping for his boldness, they must be adjusting.
On the 'sneak up', that's really my point. We are being taken seriously.
-
Read/heard two things recently.
1) Suggests Lions are no longer able to surprise their opponent. This is both in what they term as grit and in talent. Over the past year they've lost only 5 games. The honeymoon is over. No sneaking up on anyone anymore.
2) Campbell's bold in-game gambles are also now not a surprise. Game 1 @ KC, 4th and 4 fake punt in own end was 😲. Against GB similar situation, I was even half expecting it.
Bottom line, opposition is adapting to what's now a larger data set for Campbell, Johnson and Glenn. Lastly, outside the top and bottom extremes there isn't much separation between NFL teams, "parity" is a real thing.
Still have faith and that home playoff game still looks like a legit outcome. Love it!
ASIDE...wonder if N.O. takes the ball first if they win the coin flip. Balt. and GB both did it and put us on our heels.
-
Love seeing Day all worked up
-
48 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:
...I also concede that I am just a fan and not a 15 year NFL vet like Glenn was on top of all of his coaching history. Between him and Campbell there has to be a reason why they are reluctant to other than them just being terrible at what they do.
Yes.
This is just a message board and by definition this is where we cite our expertise as armchair coaches, myself included. From this seat, I embrace 8-2 and currently the #2 seed. I think evidence supports that our offense is what will carry us in tight games. Is this team strong enough to make a run to a conference championship game. At this point I say yes. Room for improvement ... always.
I did not expect this much at this point and we still have 7 weeks to go. Lots will happen between here and there.
Still, as lordstanley said earlier, blowouts are welcome.
-
35 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:
Yeah everybody complains about Glenn and I get it it's frustrating when you see teams carve you up and it's easier to blame the DC but considering the injuries and just overall talent level on the defense I don't think they have been THAT bad and I think you'd be hard pressed to find a DC that would be much better.
I mean look at who Glenn has to work with, Hutch is a beast but even he isn't a Myles Garrett type outside of him you have McNeil who would start on most teams but that would prob be it on the d line. Anzalone has been solid this year but that has been offset by Campbell being one of the worst LBs in the league, hopefully that is just due to being a rookie.
In the secondary you have Sutton who is good but again it's not like he is a bonafide number 1, if he was we wouldn't have gotten him for what we paid. I love Branch but like Campbell he is still a rookie and prone to some lapses not to mention him probably not being 100%.
Add it all up and I just think it's unfair to expect that good of defense with the players they have. Maybe you can argue they should blitz more but then you have guys like Jacobs being left on an island.
Yea, that’s a good summary of my opinion. And having only Hutch creating pressure a mobile QB can escape, which means open space to scramble/run and/or db’s needing to cover extended time. Fast QB gonna run and good WR gonna eventually get open. Especially with a guy like Jacob’s and even with a better corner like Sutton.
-
22 minutes ago, RedRamage said:
Hard to say for sure. I mean the whole appeal of a running QB is that it makes it harder for a defense so we should expect to running QBs to be harder to defend in general.
This...
Also if it is 'scheming' someone explain what should be done vs what was done. Things listed above sound more like execution vs scheming, but that's just me. Open to hearing from anyone...
-
Just now, Motor City Sonics said:
Okay Aaron Glenn, show us what you worked on during Halftime.
They held Chi to 3 after the opening drive…
-
17 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:
And an 8 minute TD drive would be sweet.
It was nice to wish… 🫤
-
D looks like it adjusted some against those designed Fields runs after the first drive. Secondary still frustrating me some…but we up!
-
Underwhelming as this has been, up by 4 & getting the ball back after half! 👍🏻
-
1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said:
LOL - Thanks for that!
Ironically, the only people I've ever argued about this with were all born post word processor.
I remember doing a lots of search and replace for two spaces back to one on final assembled copies of bid documents when we had several people working on them.
The other tidbit is that IIRC, the IBM 'Selectric' typewriter was capable of proportional spacing even before the word processor era, though I couldn't tell you how it actually did space after a period.
OR make each sentence it's own paragraph! 😉
-
16 hours ago, number20 said:
😄 😄
Want to know how to spot the old geezers on this forum? Look for double-spacing between sentences. It's an old carryover from the manual typewriter days. Everyone was taught to double space back then to offset the problem of monospaced typesetting. It has nothing to do with punctuation (single-spacing has always been correct). Word processors eliminated the need for double-spacing decades ago. After around 1990, any typing class still teaching to double-space after a sentence was way behind the times.
And sorry all you curmudgeons, but don't even go there with me. I use to run a tech publishing department. I get this all the time. Single-spacing is correct, double-spacing is NOT, and hasn’t been since forever. Print, web... you name it, every professional publication out there correctly single-spaces between sentences. And it’s been that way for years and years. If you don’t believe me, go look for yourself. Even Microsoft Word’s spell check flags double-spacing as an error
Listen here kid! It is an old habit that is/was hard to break. I got grief for it here at work. Go easy on the old geezers, we bring wisdom. 😀
-
43 minutes ago, lordstanley said:
Speaking of the defensive backfield, during the gameday thread I think I read a couple of people speculating whether or not Branch was injured or something I haven’t heard anything like that post-game though, so was it just people looking for an explanation as to why the Lions were getting lit up?
Hey Lord, I think the comments were more like ...he started the year so strong, was everywhere making plays, and has not been the same since he was out a couple games back with that ankle injury...
Definite looking for some explanation...but not a new injury...
- 1
-
13 hours ago, TP_Fan said:
...Outside of the red zone we have the best OC in football...
What?
I am older than most, but I can't keep up with this. Growth is good.
-
Just now, Tigerbomb13 said:
Would it be too much to ask to hold them to a FG?
Unless ity4th and long a FG attempt is not happening
-
TD. Should not be reversed.
-
9 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:
Philly tried to give it away but Dallas choked it back. Horrible offensive and defensive sequence.
Refs certainly tightened up “illegal procedure” on that last Dallas possession. Compare it against the KC game. Continuing to despise Dallas keeps getting easier…
-
Ravens took care of Seahawks…easily. 👍🏻
Week Thirteen: Detroit Lions (8-3) @ New Orleans Saints (5-6)
in Detroit Lions
Posted
Tater Salad, that took some time and it was clear.
I am fine w/fair minded criticism and increasing expectations.
All fair points devoid of the wild extremes and hyperbole.
👍