TigerNation

Fundamental misunderstanding of how odds work.

Do you think any pitching additions will result in our pitching staff giving up one full run a game less over the course of a season?

The booms and busts have been so extreme this year.

I trust this years offense to win those games.

You're definitely misremembering something. Verlander and Ichiro were both on the AL team.

125 is good, but not too good that there's no reason to keep you at the level. Franyerber is not really the level of prospect that jumps levels every year, he's more of a spend a whole year at one level kind of prospect. At least until he forces his way up

Another article that is cited in that detailing Greene's new approach at the plate this year. From few weeks prior but I had not read it yet. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/riley-greenes-strikeouts-arent-a-dealbreaker/

I don't think Hinch is looking at Olsen and Flaherty as unreliable pitching.

Thinking it could be possible to get Miller without giving up a top 100 prospect is some of the most delusional trade talk I've ever seen. Miller would net a top 100 prospect if he was a two month rental, and you're getting him for 5 postseason runs. You'd have to absolutely blow the As away with an offer, they have no desire to move him now.

That package for Miller? Do you guys not realize Miller has a 14+ K/9 and has four more years of control right?

Miller will require at least two of Clark, McGonigle, Rainer, and Briceno, plus some extra.

Melton with 33Ks and 6 BB in 20.2 IP in AAA. One to keep an eye for an end of season bullpen tryout.

I'm old enough to remember when Riley Greene was overrated and should've been dropped to 7th in the order.

178 wRC+ and 0.9 WAR in 82 PAs is MVP level, not borderline all-star. Unfortunately it's not at all sustainable.

I mean, it's clearly Witt.