RedRamage

If you're not picking Green Bay to win the SB every year from now on I'm going to hunt you down and beat you up.

It does lend itself to some nice nicknames though: Commies... 'Ders...

Isn't Philly supposed to be a dominate running team with "okay" passing? Seems like it's pretty logical that the secondary would look better than normal while the front seven looked worse.

He had a few really good penetrations, but whiffed on a few tackles. Like the Lions, there was a lot of promise there and something to build on.

That's really interesting. I never suspected that about you. You hide your hatred well I guess.

I'm not upset, no. Philly is the more talented team. (virtually) Everyone knows this. You need to take some risky shots, sometimes it doesn't pay off.

PARTYLY to blame. Some of the drops were all on the receivers, some of the drops are mostly on the receivers, some were on Goff and on the receiver.

I feel like Goff is partly to blame here. I know the old saying: If it touches your hands you gotta catch it. But it seemed like a lot of Goff's passes were just not in ideal receiving locations.

ftfy

So don't film the locker rooms.

Anyone see the Iowa-S.Dakota game? I wonder if something like this has ever happened before. Iowa's offense was NOT shut out.* Iowa's defense did NOT score a TD. Iowa's defense outscored Iowa's offense. Here's a link with the painful "highlights" to the same with zero TDs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPejgjoQqlo (*I suppose you could argue that the 'offense' did get shut out as the FG was scored by special teams, but typically when talking about the offense or points scored by the offense FGs are usually included I believe.)

But how much of that was because of Slater? Bob Quinn was with the Patriots from 2000-2015, only two losing season during that time.

And while we're on the topic of side notes: Was anyone else surprised at how little Ben Johnson was featured? Now I'm sure part of that was just that the Duce/AG part was very entertaining, but honestly it just felt like Johnson wasn't around.

Agreed... and the stuff they did show was very interesting to me. Showing a bit of the players themselves... some of the players families... how things like cuts down decisions are made... how Brad and Dan handled cutting players. That was very entertaining to me. On a side note: Does anyone not think that if (when?) Aaron Glenn gets a HC job that Duce Staley won't be gone in an instant as his OC?

There's probably truth there. I don't think we really saw any secret intel on the Lions in the show, but of course there's probably hours and hours and hours of footage that exists that we never saw, and of course there were parts that were blurred. A team may worry that if they are filmed each and every day that possibility of some of that film leaking out to the opposition would increase. Now, if the team itself was in charge of the filming, editing, and distribution that might lessen the chance of operational secrets getting out but then each team would have to have a greatly expanded media division and it's questionable if the revenue from a one hour a week show for each of the 32 teams would merit that increased cost.

If you're talking about things that are against NFL rules, why wouldn't the NFL want that footage? I mean I guess you could say they know rules are being broken and they're all okay with it (for example, baseball and steroids in the 90s). If you're talking about real illegal things... I would hope that the NFL would want evidence of that as well to get that out there. Maybe I'm just not understanding what you're trying to say.

Just finished the last episode. Damn man... that was very enjoyable watching hard knocks. I seriously wish they had something like this all season long. It was be so much fun to have a hour show each week between the games just showing some of the behind the scenes stuff. Mix in some of the highlights from the last game... What would be pretty much must see TV for me.

Yup... the correct answer is: D. All of the Above.

I honestly don't understand this. Boyle looked awful. It's not that Blough was that much better, but he was better. Why would you not try to get Blough back from the Vikings Practice Squad. I guess that assume that Blough wants to come back, but I think even the 3rd string QB on a bad team is preferable to practice squad on a semi-decent team, isn't it? Edit to make clear: I'm NOT saying that I want Blough or that I think he would contribute towards Lions success. I'm just just saying that I feel Boyle will contribute even less so if I had to pick between them I'm picking Blough.

Yeah, I mean a part of me says "Keep him around cause Sudfeld doesn't know the system and if Goff goes down right away we're be stuck with someone who doesn't know the team or plays." But realistically, Blough didn't look great after knowing the teams and plays anyway. Plus there's almost two week until the first game... Sudfeld should at least be semi-familiar with things by then, and if Blough is on the practice squad it's not like they could use him in a game in which Goff got injured anyway.

But, but, but... Sandra Bullock said LT was the most important.

That's like saying Crimea probably isn't am ideal vacation destination right now.

2022: Paschal - injured 2021: Onwuzurike - Did start any games in 21 but played in 16. Now injured 2020: Swift - Good player, but also had some injuries 2019: Tavai - Bust, Only two years with the team, just 6 starts 2018: Davis - Showed some promise, but never paned out. 3 years and off the team. 2017: Tabor - Bust, two years and gone. 2016: Robinson - Has some success, but never was a star player, 4 years with the team. Rams picked him up and he started 14 games for them last year in their super bowl drive. Probably worthy of a 2nd round pick for his career so far, but the Lions certainly didn't get 2nd round value for him. 2015: Abdullah - Another promising player who was frequently injured and failed to accomplish much with the Lions. 2014: Van Noy - A bust for the Lions but made a decent name for himself away from Detroit. 2013: Slay - a bonafide good player, good value in 2nd round. 2012: Broyles - Bust, played 21 games across 3 season before leaving the game 2011: Young & Leshoure - Bust, and bust. Young played 26 games, Leshoure 17 2010: The Lions did not draft a bust in the second round this year... 2009: Delmas - Delmas wasn't exactly a star player, but I believe he was decent. Played 5 seasons for detroit. 2008: Dizon - Bust, 28 games over two season, zero starts. 2007: Stanton, Alama-Francis, Alexander - Stanton was a backup QB drafted way too high. Alama-Francis had injury issues, Alexander also had injury issues. 2006: Bullocks - Two seasons and he was out of the game. 2005: Cody - Played 4 season for the Lions, but only started 11 games. Not much for a 2nd round pick. 2004: Lehman - Decent first year, then injuries sidelined his career. Stuck around for 4 season with the Lions. 2003: Bailey - Decent enough player but I seem to remember he got injured frequently. Stuck around for 4 years. In the past two decades of drafting we had one star player come out of the second round.

This is supposed to be Brad Holmes specialty right? Finding late round gems? He's certainly looked good on Hard Knocks and the coaches seem to love him, so here's hoping!

Not that I believe it, but I would guess the argument would be that he's remorseful that his actions had the unintended consequence of damaging the NFLs public image. Everything he did he feels was fully consensual, but in hindsight he understands that it presents a poor look for a NFL QB and he should have been a better roll model. (Just to be clear: I'm saying that I don't believe that he's actually remorseful.)