I agree, but it's still cool to have it.
The Beatles split up at the right time. 60s were over. 70's were schmaltzy and tacky, but one wonders, with the influence the Beatles had, would they have pointed 70s culture in a different direction? or would they have kind of sounded like this? How many barriers were left for them to break? All they did, recording-wise, was only in 7 years basically. That's incredible. The Clash did what they did in only about 5 (we'll forget 'Cut The Crap'). Some bands burn bright and burn out. The Beatles WERE the 60s, they couldn't pull that off in the 70s. What they did in the 60s fried them. There was no 'Beatles'-like band in the 70's, The 80s had Prince. These things are rare.