Jump to content

Dan Gilmore

Members
  • Posts

    493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Dan Gilmore

  1. I would put the odds of all six of those players in Detroit next year at zero. Two are likely, most of the rest unlikely barring lots of injuries. So I’ll say Keith, Malloy and maybe Wenceel. I doubt Wenceel is more productive than Ibanez should he be called up. If Jung continues to impress in AF
     play, maybe he comes up instead of Perez. Personally I would dangle him for a trade.

  2. The first sentence (and paragraph) of the NYT story Eric linked is this:

    Billions of dollars in U.S. military and economic aid have enabled Ukraine to fend off Russia’s invasion, but the future of that support is now in serious doubt.

  3. My healthy, athletic daughter got covid during the initial waves (March 2020). Long covid has majorly degraded her health. Her experience with doctors (which hopefully is/has changed) was to dismiss the symptoms she had being covid related. I hope at some point there will be more studies, and effective treatments and she can regain much of what she lost. 

    • Sad 2
  4. Without much certainty about their futures, limitations or value, it seems to me that they have a good number of options for 2B. Keith, Wenceel, Jung, plus Kreidler/Short and others (not digging into Ibanez/Maton/Nevin levels). While it would be nice to have one of them also be able to play 3B well, and hit, it is an area I hope they explore for trades. Another young catcher for Jung (D Rushing?). 
     

    One of Malloy/Carpenter should be the primary DH IMO, with the other either given limited play in the field, or shopped.

    This offseason has much more pitching FA talent, so if $$$ is to be spent, I would like a major spend there-Lorenzen as a floor for quality. Assuming ERod opts out, but maybe even if he doesn’t. 

     

    • Thanks 1
  5. Hesitant as I am to prolong the Candelario debate, where are you getting the 4.4 WAR for 2023? I see lower numbers. @Tiger337 Are you extrapolating for the full year? 
     

    To me, the debate of whether to keep in was related to a judgement of how well he was likely to do this year, with a range of possible outcomes. Suck/minor improvement, but still poor/medium improvement, but still mediocre/significant improvement, but some inconsistency/major improvement, great season/Awesomeness. I think based on his recent past, as well as a pattern of inconsistency, that the Tigers determined that the first sets of outcomes were more likely than the later set. He wasn’t going to either suck or be a very good player as the only two paths forward.  I think a discussion of the merits of projections comes into play here. Whose projections? Degree of certainty, caveats and hedges. I now return to trying to ignore this topic…

  6. While we have learned more since the ERod trade crashed and burned, we never actually got the black box to know fully what happened, and where blame should fall. Without that knowledge I am fine with assigning a good deal of blame to Harris, but well short of calling it his failure. Maybe it will be revealed later, should ERod opt out.

    • Like 1
  7. I am glad to see Jung show more production, but also wonder if he would be a good trade candidate, assuming he continues to show power. A trade for a good young LH catcher? Might not be enough on his own, but I also think we have enough 2Bs in the system to not miss him that much. 

×
×
  • Create New...