Jump to content

theroundsquare

Members
  • Posts

    384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by theroundsquare

  1. I think the answer to that is "no."  In contract law, "consideration" is anything given in exchange.  I read this provision to use the phrase "cash consideration" to mean cash given in exchange.  The meaning is not different than if "consideration" were dropped; it seems only to convey as sense of specificity for "cash consideration" as opposed to other consideration, like a player contract the proverbial bag of balls. 

  2. Nope.  to each his own.  I like it, and i recognize that i'm one of the few.

    What i was saying is that when the D on the jerseys was changed in 2019 (maybe 2018?), the rationale was that MLB was cracking down and requiring uniformity of logos, so the Tigers had to make the hat and jersey have the same version of the D.  That is bull****.  many teams don't have the allegedly-required uniformity.  Most notably the yankees interlocking NY are different between the hat and jersey. 

  3. 58 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

    I just wonder if preparing for and attending the hearing comes close to exceeding the salary gap.

    this is what i thought.  i have to deal with this with clients all the time.  but it cuts both ways.  mize has to pay to prepare, too.  i don't know how agency contracts work, so i wonder if whatever he pays his agents, standard, includes the agency handling an arb hearing.  likewise, i don't know if the tigers would handle this in-house or if there is what amounts to 'outside counsel' that would come in, with additional cost

×
×
  • Create New...