Jump to content

pfife

Members
  • Posts

    4,540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by pfife

  1. 36 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

    If Mike Pence just voted to overturn the election, we wouldn't have had January 6th. 

    Bad analogy 

  2. 37 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

    Makes sense. If Israel just gives Hamas the hostages, we won't have this mess. 

    Bad analogy.

  3. The article said it was Brown University’s corporate board gets to vote.

    The tactic actually worked for all people involved so far.   I don't know if a no vote will bring back protestors, that's a question that remains.   But it was a peaceful solution that worked... for now.  If/when they come back, you deal with that then. 

    Since we're doing a lot of guessing and speculating, I'd speculate that Columbia wishes they woulda done what Brown did. 

     

     

  4. What isn't speculative is there was no encampment problem at Brown and Brown owes the protestors nothing but a vote of No from the board of corporate governors on their divestiture proposal.

    Obviously a successful tactic in avoiding the protestor mess other schools experienced.

  5. 1 minute ago, Motown Bombers said:

    I mean, why don't more schools just give into mobs? 

    No giving in.   They just vote no on the proposal.    Not shocked you didn't read the article.   

    • Haha 1
  6. It's just the classic move of promising a vote on something.  No promise of a successful vote, just a vote.   Happens in legislature all the time.

  7. 3 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

    because most schools with major money in endowments don't want to give up investment decisions to anyone for anything - it could cost them real money and real money speaks louder to TPTB  than foreign policy politics!

    Wouldn't they just vote no then, and move on?

  8. Idk why more schools didn't just do what Brown did, promise them a vote on Israel divestiture, if it passes cool, if it doesn't, cool.    Worked swimmingly there.

  9. 17 minutes ago, 1776 said:

    Iran attacked Israel on April 13th. Trump’s trial began on the 15th. Israel retaliated to Iran’s attack of the 13th on April 19th. 
    I believe your comment above is beyond anything that be proven at this point considering the other events outside Trump’s trial. The attack and counter attack between Iran and Israel are far more relevant to the ongoing protests than Trump’s trial. 

     

    And before Iran directly attacked Israel, Israel hit Irans consulate.  And before that... on and on....

  10. So now it's right wing agitators and you're still blaming people other than right wing agitators.   Peculiar indeed. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  11. 3 hours ago, mtutiger said:

    His anti-vaxx stance was always the biggest red-flag.... there was a poll result (I'd have to find it) that found that once once voters who were unaware of his anti-vax views were made aware of them, Republican support increased and Dem support decreased.

    It's one of the defining things about his political persona, and will only be further fleshed out as this campaign goes on.

    I guess the theory was it would exploit the left leaning anti vaxers?   Hell idk what they were thinking because antivax is basically a trumper thing so it seems epically dumb

  12. 33 minutes ago, chasfh said:

    Breaking bomber by getting him to hand out his first-ever reactions to you and running up your score is just straight-up gangsta 

    nah he's just stealing someone else's schtick again

    • Haha 1
  13. "If a bunch of stuff that didn't happened happened by a bunch of people who didn't do the stuff that didn't happen, the people who didn't react to the stuff that never happened would OBVIOUSLY react in a totally different way according to my opinion which is also conveniently my argument"

     

    • Haha 1
  14. I wonder if MAGA is going to continue to use people's preferred pronouns

    oh, wait, I'm glad it's not my argument that these folks are MAGA.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...