pfife

And you apparently love to be the liar.

OK rad drama-generating hypothetical but here in this actual real thread of posts you posted, you did accuse me of leaving out what you called the biggest reality. It's been quoted and bolded. I'm sorry that you posted something you didn't intend to post, so you can just say sorry and move on but some like drama

Now that we have clearly established by quoting and bolding your post that you were in fact, accusing me of this - let's dig a little deeper. You say this is the "bigggest" reality - I would argue it's absolutely not bigger reality than the hypothetical person (who actually has thousands of real life examples) family being in danger. It may be equal reality but not bigger, both are equally real.

Here's where you literally accused me.

You literally said I left that out. It was an accusation. You gp ahead and take comfort in misrepresenting both mine and your own posts as if I cant read.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/11/01/politics/ken-buck-will-not-seek-reelection/index.html Ken Buck quote: “Our movement has always been fueled by immutable truths about human nature individual liberty and economic freedoms,” the Colorado Republican said in his video announcement. “The Republican Party of today, however, is ignoring self-evident truths about the rule of law and limited government in exchange for self-serving lies.”

It's amazing how much the senate sucks.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/01/tuberville-military-promotion-hold/ Senate Republicans erupt in anger over Tuberville’s military freeze

Yeah, I read an article that said he is now blocking individual votes where he was previously saying he wouldn't do that. Ernst and Sullivan are pissed off at him. I think tuberville stunt will be done soon.

Oh you accused me of leaving that out but now you're talking about not me so I'll let you take that up with the not me's.

That canary mission account that's been mentioned here has more video of the Harvard event, and they claim the edtaritor of Harvard Law Review is part of the mob. It seems like the extended video is the 15 seconds we've already seen then it abruptly cuts to what I think is a phone being held by the victim in the minutes preceding the mob. He seems to be trying to cut through the courtyard area and they keep holding up the textiles and saying "exit", redirecting him around. He repeatedly tells people not to touch him and not to grab him and you can hear others in the background yelling at people not to touch him.

Oblong it seems like you're arguing that Israel's response is because of an act of war perpetrated on them. I agree with that. Likewise, why couldn't the behavior of the people in that unverified Harvard video be because of that as well, like I've been arguing?

I don't think that part was left out, it's mutually agreed upon by all posters involved in this discussion.

Regarding Rashida Tlaib: I don't have the slightest idea whether she is antisemitic, in her heart. What I mean by that is that I don't know whether she hates Jewish people b/c they're Jewish (I get that isn't the universe of antisemitism but what I'm going with). I give her the benefit of the doubt on it. What I do think is she has generations of her family in the West Bank and it's probably unrealistic to expect someone who's family has been at war with Israel for a long time to not hate Israel. As 84 posted, in a war, countries/peoples have the right to defend themselves and there will be innocent casualties because of that right. So if innocent casualties are "acceptable" (for lack of better words) under actions of war, hating your enemy in that war is far less troubling, is it not? Isn't that almost a basic prereq for going to war? 84, please correct me if I put words into your mouth you don't want, definitely not my intention.

I sat and watched a bunch of boomers accuse Ilhan Omar of being anti-semitic for saying "all about the benjamins". Anyone who's heard a rap song from 2000 forward knows what she meant. Easy to accuse

People here in the last few days have been castigating folks for ignoring these events... folks are looking the other way at anti-semitism. Given you seem to be suggesting these events were happening before the war as indicated in the bold, but those same people currently castigating were ignoring those events at that time... or at least not posting here about it. What's the difference? While it doesn't take anything to display antisemitism, as you mention, it also doesn't take much to accuse folks of it when it very well may not be that.

so which is it? Does it matter why these expressions of hatred (your words) are happenings, or does it not? Because in 2 posts you argued two opposite things. This is a direct quote where you said it didn't matter This that you said on is important: That's why it's really important to make the distinction. And important to know if the offenders are acting out of war or pure hatred (or a mixture of both). Because what to do about it to stop it could differ depending on the answer. I think it could go even deeper than that. What if you live in the US but lets say your grandparents live in Gaza. If you hate Israel b/c they're bombing where your grandparents live, is that different than hating Israel b/c they're Jewish? I think it's hugely different and has hugely different proscriptive implications.

Thank you. Now, you mentioned people who agreed with your admittedly incorrect interpretation..........

Yes it does. Besides, if you really believed that, you wouldn't be here arguing it happened because of aniti-semitism because why it happened doesn't matter. If you really believed it didn't matter why it happened, you'd be attacking other people's explanations for why it happened as well, but you're not. You're literally saying why it happened doesn't matter and then ranting about why it happened... in the very same post.

@Tigeraholic1 I just reread that post of mine you quoted and it's still really good thanks for resurfacing it. It's hard to believe that a bunch of good guys with guns chose not to stop a bad guy and made all sorts of excuses why they didn't meanwhile the rest of us endure all the trash that comes with them yearning the opportunity to cosplay hero and they choked hard. Lmao hilarious this gets all in your fee fees Don't let facts get in the way of your preferred social policy.

Hi where did I say what happened in the video was ok?

In light of Chas's post, new recap: 1) We don't actually know if the video is real- poster of video has very conspicuously not confirmed it's authenticity as of yet. No other reporting of the situation found. 2) We don't actually know the political leanings of the perps in the video, so far it has been inferred by posters here and the only criteria given thus far is the skinny pants and boots they're wearing. 3) We don't know why the individual was targeted, so far it has been noted by the caption on the video and in the tweet accompanying the video. (Note, the tweet is written by an individual who has not confirmed the veracity of the video he posted on X) and posters here have inferred it's because he was Jewish. 5) Many news sites have reported increases in these types of events since the war began but "who cares" whether the war had anything to do with it, just like "who cares" whether Pearl Harbor had anything to do with Japanese Internment Camps. 6) Holic lied about what pfife said and doesn't have the stones, skinny pants, or patent leather boots to admit it. We'll keep trying there lil guy

So to recap: 1) We don't actually know if the video is real- poster of video has very conspicuously not confirmed it's authenticity as of yet. No other reporting of the situation found. 2) We don't actually know the political leanings of the perps in the video, so far it has been inferred by posters here and the only criteria given thus far is the skinny pants and boots they're wearing. 3) We don't know if the victim was a student or a protestor (video caption suggests he's a student, Chas mentioned he's a protestor) 4) Because we don't know if he was a protestor or not, we don't know why he was surrounded - folks here have claimed it's because he's Jewish, but if he was a protestor that's a whole different story than what's being told here. 5) Many news sites have reported increases in these types of events since the war began but "who cares" whether the war had anything to do with it, just like "who cares" whether Pearl Harbor had anything to do with Japanese Internment Camps. 6) Holic lied about what pfife said and doesn't have the stones, skinny pants, or patent leather boots to admit it. We'll keep trying there lil guy

To tie this to the conversation actually happening in the thread, no one would examine the American internment of Japanese not caring about Pearl Harbor or WW2 which is what you're demanding of others with respect to the events in the video.

I can't find any more reporting or news on that Harvard incident. In true X fashion the guy that shared the video who's X was posted here won't verify that it's real.