chasfh

I said it basically for its comic value, based on the fact we both know that there are many people who've posted here over the years who hate Keith Law specifically because he's been saying for years how much the Tigers suck as an organization.

Fire up the torches and pitchforks for Keith Law if you want, but he’s right. This also serves as a reminder of how John Schreiber is yet another one we let get away.

Fun fact about that first expansion year, 1961, in which the American League went to ten teams and the National League remained at eight: home run rates from 1960 to 1961 went up, and by a lot more, in the NL (0.84 to 0.97) than in the AL (0.88 to 0.95).

Robin Yount was the first player I saw who I thought, man, he's not all that much older than I. I'm a lot closer to major league age than I thought. I was 13 at the time.

But he wasn't raided. Doesn't count. Defund Justice and the FBI.

Like an NDA? Oh,

But how else you gonna stop a bad guy with a gun? Or at least be armed as you run away?

Looks like the judge.

I totally miscommunicated this—I meant to say "Just another bunch of hacks who wouldn't pledge unquestioning loyalty", to Trump I mean, which is why he is anti-both of them.

Never-Trumpers will fall in line because they can't quit the sweet sweet tax cuts (or, more exactly, taxation and welfare shifts from the lower classes to the upper classes). Republicans never minded the fascism. It's why they've had a habit of supporting right wing dictators who were just as vicious as the left wing dictators they excoriated. It's the personal antics and behavior tics they can't stand. They want the Trumpism without the Trump.

So good on so many levels ...

I really like how the Super Bowl goes basically right up to the report date now. Only two days off between the two sports.

At least Evan Petzold has been a quick convert. Almost from jump, every article he's writing now uses the phrase "control the strike zone", and every pitching and hitting line in his articles now include strikeouts and walks.

That’s why when they do robot umpires, they’re almost certainly going to treat the plate two-dimensionally, probably the middle plane that’s 8-1/2” equidistant from front and back. That would eliminate both the yakker clipping the bottom front and bouncing in the dirt for a called strike, and the ridiculous eephus coming in over the batter’s head and scraping the top back for a called strike.

For all his fire, personality, and World Series heroics, Kirk Gibson was never on an All-Star team, although, asterisk, he did turn down two invites. Hey, it was the 80s. Tony Phillips never made one, either. He might be the guy with the highest career WAR in the All-Star Game era who didn’t make one. He also got MVP votes in only one season, for us in 1993, when he finished 16th. The curse of the super-duper utility guy. He probably played more games at more non-battery positions than any player ever. No one knew just what the hell he was. One other thing about Phillips is how late he blossomed. I drafted him for an OOTP team. I had to wait a lo-o-o-ong time for that ship to come in.

Chris McCosky still carrying a big, bright, flaming torch for Hackin' Harold. Sorry to break it straight to you, Chrissie, but boyfriend's gone, and he ain't never comin' back. 💔

Interestingly, the tease on McCosky's Google page reads in a rather more alarmist manner than the actual tweet does, although the article does run along the same alarmist lines as this: I wonder what the technical reason is behind that?

Someone is all in a dither and is clutching his pearls about the new direction ...

Well, they're all the same, aren't they? Just another bunch of hacks who would pledge unquestioning loyalty.

What is your take on the FBI vs the intelligence community?

Yup. Total phony baloney.

Funny you would say this—for years I would avoid watching movies because I figured I just didn't have the time to devote two hours straight to it. Then I recently really noticed how my wife can start and stop and restart a TV show effortlessly. So I tried it—and it's great. I thought I would somehow lose the thread of what I'm watching, but I found that I repick it up just fine. I'm now starting to catch up on a bunch of movies I'd been avoiding for time reasons.

AP is all over it, @Biff Mayhem:

I'm with you on that. Although that makes it just one more thing to have to monitor. We may even forget about it after a while. It might become like that rule where if a fielder throws their glove at a ball and hits it, runners are awarded three bases. When was the last time you saw that?

I thought the rule was stupid when I first heard about it, and I’m still not sure I don’t think that, but as with the three-pitch minimum rule for relievers, I’m sure I’ll come around to being fine with it. Re the strategy part, I don’t know that it will result in any change because (I assume) a runner is already leading off the maximum amount he can get away with on every pitch anyway. Not necessarily to set up a steal, but to shorten the distance to run so if a ball is hit, they increase their chances of being safe, if ever so slightly. (And baseball is nothing if not a game of ever-so-slightly.) I can’t think of a situation where a runner is not leading off to his maximum, except in situations where he must protect his hold on first base in a game situation where losing that base would be much worse than gaining an extra base would benefit (e.g., down a run and two outs in the ninth). And in a case like that I can’t see him leading off an extra six or twelve or whatever inches after the second throw over because, again, the cost of getting picked off would be too great. There might be guys early on doing what you say, but once a few of them get picked off for their foolishness, I would bet that would stop. So I see this as less an incentive to steal bases than it is to limit endless throws to first which, I agree with you, happens hardly ever anyway.