Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

getting one point in a game that should have been a schedule loss is a pretty good outcome.

minny is the third best team in the west, they were playing at home, and the wings were on a road back to back after a big divisional game in toronto.  AND they didnt have edvinsson.

it was a good point to get.

finnie played 8 minutes tonight.  a trip to GR in his future?

Posted (edited)

That's a good outcome, actually.  

Getting a point on the road is always good

Against an equal team

On the second half of a back-to-back. 

I'll take it. 

 

I was watching the game and checked the weather in Minny and the air temp was -17.  Wind chill was -32.    Hearty bunch there.   I wouldn't have gone out in that. 

 

Edited by Motor City Sonics
Posted

JVR is fun to watch.    So much better than Tarasenko 

 

I didn't see the OT goal until just now.   That's kind of a bad goal to give up there.  Hell of a shot, but yeah.....Mo may have screened just a tad.  Mo gets about 10 mulligans this season. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said:

 

I was watching the game and checked the weather in Minny and the air temp was -17.  Wind chill was -32.    Hearty bunch there.   I wouldn't have gone out in that. 

 

 Meanwhile in -9C/15F conditions: 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, buddha said:

getting one point in a game that should have been a schedule loss is a pretty good outcome.

minny is the third best team in the west, they were playing at home, and the wings were on a road back to back after a big divisional game in toronto.  AND they didnt have edvinsson.

it was a good point to get.

finnie played 8 minutes tonight.  a trip to GR in his future?

And it wasn’t just getting the point, except for the firsr 5 minutes of the 3rd they played the Wild even. Wings looked the more dangerous team in the last 5 minutes of regulation. 

Posted

Despite the Wild driving a lot of the play I thought the Wings had a great chance to win that game.  The goals against felt really frustrating because they felt preventable if defenders and Talbot weren't going scramble mode.  But it's tough to argue with getting a point on the road on a back to back.

Posted
16 hours ago, lordstanley said:

And it wasn’t just getting the point, except for the firsr 5 minutes of the 3rd they played the Wild even. Wings looked the more dangerous team in the last 5 minutes of regulation. 

That’s why I was disappointed. I can’t remember the last time the Wings were that in control of a game. There was a shift with the big guys (Elmer and Ras) where we controlled the puck for an extended period. I think the Wild had someone near 3 minutes on a shift. We just looked like the better team. Frustrating given the game situation, but a good result given the schedule, surprise Edvinsson injury, and the night Hamonic had.

Posted (edited)

Oh, any the first Wild goal was weak, somehow it found its way through Talbot but he was in position and 99 times out of 100 he makes the save. The broken Sieder stick goal was unfortunate too. It’s hard to stress enough how much better the Wings looked outside the start of the 3rd.

Edited by sagnam

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      335
    • Most Online
      704

    Newest Member
    Stormin
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...