Jump to content

pfife

Members
  • Posts

    7,261
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by pfife

  1. LOL at the Republic Party negotiating themselves out of border security and Ukraine funding and into just Ukraine funding. Incredible use of leverage.
  2. I agree, feel that way about all social media with the obvs exception of troof dot social
  3. I'm somewhat enamored with stuff like space x unmanned rockets landing on landing pads out in the ocean but a lot of other stuff seems way overhyped
  4. if I recall correctly from 3 days ago when I last played this game if you put your thumb to your forehead before everyone else you don't have to eat the FART so don't be last they go to the floor
  5. I'm pretty amped up about overcoming the republic party FART tomorrow night and getting these kick ass folks in Ukraine some help, LFG!!!!
  6. that woulda been pretty awesome, like hack caused them to bomb themselves!
  7. I think I just heard clip of Blinken on C-SPAN saying they did know but US not involved in any way.
  8. Explosions in Iraq and Syria too
  9. Explosions in Iran, may be Israeli missiles.
  10. someone needs to clear the air about this whole FART team the trumpers have created
  11. lookin like ol' maga mike's scarramuccis as speaker are numbered
  12. just noticed he's wearing a face diaper in that photo
  13. Dude's literally a national hero. Maybe even world wide hero
  14. Why would either of us be worried? We both agree that we disagree with a statement I did not make:
  15. I don't think the comparison is heinous though. I just don't agree with it.
  16. I also didn't think the game theory was applicable either and stated why.
  17. IDK, I didn't argue that nations like the US and Israel follow the rules for a little while and then "meet fire with fire" if their opponents don't follow the rules. In fact, not only did I not argue that - you agreed with that argument! Now I'll admit I don't know for sure if he's saying they're still currently trying to follow the rules, or if they've decided to "meet fire with fire". That's why I addressed both potentialities. I tend to think this rule here seems invented by Israel so I'm not sure that means they're currently attempting to follow rules:
  18. If you're saying they're now playing by the terrorist rules since they tried to not play by terrorist rules once then I'm really glad I'm not here arguing relative morality of either
  19. Is this an example of this "follow all of the rules once" thing that you seem to be arguing Israel is currently attempting to do? Seems like it's not.
  20. Not a fan of hypotheticals but would having a consulate bombed normally lead to a declaration of war?
  21. You specifically have come here to this specific thread and accused me of antisemitism multiple times, so you can miss me Javy Baez swinging at the plate style with your ridiculously hypocritical virtue signaling.
  22. However, my understanding is they view Iran's attack as a response to Israel's attack on Iran's consulate in Syria.
  23. Lucky for you we have three untrained psychoanalysts who have never met or talked to the people to answer that question definitively.
  24. These videos get hundreds of thousands, millions of views. Posters here help proliferate them. Sides consolidate further. All of those are purposes for what they're doing that aren't armchair remote psychoanalysis by people who aren't psychoanalysts that also virtue signal while accusing others of virtue signaling
×
×
  • Create New...