pfife

Olbermann noted in his podcast today that Trump truth'd yesterday at 433pm that he's now being indicted. Could obviously be talking about his prior indictments but timing could mean he knows he's been indicted on the Jan 6 front. He posted just after grand jury meeting ended yesterday.

Don't forget my guy Doug Jones. That dude kicks so much ass

more like Charlie Jirk

This goes well with Tater's post https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/22/us/politics/ron-desantis-covid.html Once a vaccine advocate, the Florida governor lost his enthusiasm for the shot before the Delta wave sent Covid hospitalizations and deaths soaring. It’s a grim chapter he now leaves out of his rosy retelling of his pandemic response.

It is my unsolicited opinion that most of the posters in this political forum would like the movie Oppenheimer. I just watched it and I thought it was really good.

there goes obamas campaign

Ikr? It's fun to argue someone contradicting themselves so much.

Well literally on today's date you said it wasn't black &white

1. E makes claim 2. P makes claim 3. P posts article supporting claim 4. E posts article supporting claim, also contradicting prior claims he made. 5. E declares victory and calls P names. Lol ok

I said cave, not cater. They caved.

right, they should have caved to the worst elements of society quicker.

It's also a good point about Target. Apparently the best move is to cave to haters faster than bud light did. Love it when conservatives go all neville chamberlain

I didn't get proven wrong. You posted an article and so did I. That the articles contradict one another doesn't mean you proved anything. It's still weird that you argued the interview caused backlash then posted that the insta post caused the backlash and just don't even give a rats that you flip flopped. But you proved me wrong I suppose. I bet that helps you feel good about blaming everyone else for the behavior of Trans haters

It is pretty incredible that he argued the interview caused outrage the just posts completely contradictory info that the insta post created outrage. Must be nice to just morph argument as needed even 180 degrees if necessary

So is it not black and white like you said? Are you going to not argue about it like you said? Also is it really your argument that the interview caused the outrage because what you just posted and i quoted clearly indicates the insta post, not the interview, sparked the outrage which is also opposite of what you argued earlier.

The good news here though is we can finally define woke. It means calling people fratty because that's why people are mad at woke bud light

I was just thinking about how it made total sense that the people who really really hate trans people are mad at bud light not because of trans people but because a vp called them fratty

Articles abound saying she addressed the outrage in the interview but maybe it was her predicting outrage and addressing her predicted outrage since outrage didn't exist before the interview or maybe it's just super hard and confusing

Oh so you declare the timeline followed by a declaration that the timeline isn't black and white. So needless to say I'm sold and this is all libs and Biden that caused it. Sorry to bother you from contradicting yourself elsewhere

I've seen others Xing this too.

The interview happened after the backlash started.

Lol that's quite a lot of making up what I believe champ