pfife

Any word on those icd9 diags you were talking about? I'm interested in running the numbers and confirming your numbers

Are you arguing they don't force high prices on consumers while lavishly rewarding CEOs?

dude I was about to be like archie when someone says automatic instead of semi automatic. it was really glorious in my mind which reminds me I should probably purposefully only say automatic instead of semi-automatic from now on.

do you have the same concerns about the 750b/year military budget? It's honestly incredible to me how small the BBB bill is compared to our military budget

delete that you're ruining the trap

I'd like to query the data, what ICD-9 codes are you talking about specifically for Covid-19 diagnosis?

which icd-9 codes are you talking about re: covid-19 diagnosis?

I hate to tell you but literally everyone is going to die after getting the vax. If you get vaxxed it's impossible to die before getting vaxxed. Dying after vax is the only possibility

it feels to me more like saying JaCoby Jones can't possibly go 3/4 one day because of his priors. And that one time he did, don't pay attention to it, pay attention to the priors (which happen to be priors about Biden's victory, not BBB) instead. We don't have priors about BBB b/c as you said it's one poll.

I'm already bored of 5g, can't wait for 6g

sometimes you see posts that make you wish we had signatures still on this forum

Tristan recently said the FCC was going to revoke Fox New's license. I'm going with not very dependable. However he does attribute it to David Cay Johnston by name so perhaps an evaluation of him is more suitable. I've always liked what David Cay says but that's a different question than whether he's been accurate. I genuinely don't know his record on that, but do know he's been a long time journalist covering trump and his org

Little late but good move. Hopefully this can keep the capitalists from destroying tests

yeah I'm pretty much convinced that his vote has little to do with what his constituents think is popular. We already saw writeups that his Fox News Sunday performance was based on meanies hurting his fee fees and we've established in many instances he doesn't vote Trumpily, and like MB said, actually voted to remove Trump from office. Not to mention we do have empiricism that says that these programs are popular in WV and he's voting against them. That's more evidence his vote has little to do with what his constituents like.

or maybe the bayesian reasoning isn't about D4P but for the whole BBB situation to which I would ask again, what new evidence came out about BBB or Manchin or the presidential election that lead to hypothesis readjustment associated with Bayes reasoning? The evidence around these is not new. It was almost 1 year ago that Trump won WV by >40. It's been even longer that everyone knew Trump would roll in WV. That's not new evidence, it's the oldest evidence of any component. Was his hypothesis pre-adjustment via Bayesian reasoning that...... BBB was popular in WV? Then the NEW evidence that trump won by 40 entered the chat?

What new evidence came out after I screenshotted his website grading data for progress as a B?

Well I guess our talk about Manchin voting based on his constituents was totally irrelevant. Of course the reason for Manchins vote is.... wait for it..... Manchins feefees!!!!! I can't imagine why ppl wouldnt rush to elect more of this shit

No

Seeing a number of ppl tweeting things of this nature So there's a nytimes report, and this dude pushed it further than the nytimes report. This is all the Jan6 committee, so in addition to NYAG who Trump apparently sued today to stop an investigation. NY times report, which of course leaves trumps name out of the headline because of long standing conservative bias that has been repeatedly demonstrated in threads here and the old board. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/20/us/politics/jan-6-committee-criminal-referrals.html