pfife

As was mentioned earlier it's the pervasiveness that is different now. When we were kids, if you got bullied at school you went home and didn't get bullied anymore until the next day. Now, you go home, and it continues online. Perhaps even worse than in person. If a parent thinks "keep them off social media" protects their child, it doesn't - the bullying doesn't stop just b/c the victim doesn't see it b/c they're not allowed on the website. That decision could be unilateral disarming which has a whole host of other implications.

Couldn't agree more, especially regarding the children. It's those lil ****bird kids that deserve it the most. Those lil terrorists deserve every bomb they get given they inaccurately contemplated the geopolitical implications of other people's actions before those other people committed those actions

You should let all parents abd principals know they have nothing to worry about. It's too bad you didn't googlr for all of them earlier

Ok

I wish you the best. My buddy's daughter got herself into trouble bullying over Discord, she was also sending hentai porn to the person she was bullying. She was 11 at the time.

there was a teacher slap challenge a couple years ago too

one example, kids at my daughters school were trashing the bathrooms because of a challenge on tick tock

I am saying he should have left out the bloviations about sympathy from jury he had no power to convene. The rest of your post is your words

There's a DOJ memo prohibiting the indictment of the sitting president. Hur works for the DOJ. He should not be pontificating about a jury having sympathy for Biden when the rules disallow charging the president let alone convening a jury.

It was the only polish hur had for his turd. Couldn't imagine choosing to come here and publicly defend it

No, congress can't change the minimum age. There's no constitutional mechanism for congress changing the min age to be president, the constitution would need to be amended. The 14th Amendment Section 3 though does explicitly say that congress can remove the sanctions that preclude one from being in office b/c they engaged in insurrection. So if they bounce him from the ballot congress (theoretically) could remove that sanction after the ballot was printed/election happened without him on the ballot, so he winds up jammed in that scenario.

If Mr. Hur thought Biden was too sympathetic of a figure b/c of his age and memory to secure a guilty conviction beyond a reasonable doubt in front of a jury, what actually means in legal terms is that Mr. Hur did not secure the evidence needed to establish Biden's Mens Rea beyond a reasonable doubt. *THAT* is what he puts into the report. Of course, it's all fantasy anyways. Because there's a DOJ memo that precludes the charging of the sitting president, and charging would need to occur before the task of establishing the mens rea, so the DOJ memo is the beginning and end of it. As it was with Mueller. Except for when E hates the innocent person why speculate on what a jury would feel about President Joe Biden if the DOJ isn't allowed to charge President Joe Biden with a crime that would necessitate convening a jury

Everyone except Carle knows that the DOJ isn't supposed to lodge personal attacks. They either charge or they stfu. Unless Carle doesn't like the person being attacked then the personal attacks are gods work

you seem very inspired about defending personal attacks on an innocent man. Pants fitting tight?

I said it should not be presented. Just like Mueller and at least 2 other SCs appointed under the same law did not Cool story though Eric Carle

there is no republican establishment other than trumpism

I'm not wrong and you calling me wrong is evidence that I'm not wrong

I dont need to protect my daughter from this forum but whatever works for you

so tonight is when Tay and Travis Pfizer install Biden for 4 more years after the Chefs win the rigged super bowl right

It's interesting that the same law that compelled Mueller to not lodge personal attacks against the person he was investigating and not charging, *did* compel personal attacks against the person this jabroni was investigating and not charging The fact is, if it were a level playing field, the conversation starts and ends at the same DOJ memo regarding indicting a sitting president that Mueller cited.

Esweig putting in the work defending personal attacks on an innocent person in a legal document, cheers on the noble cause

I never said anything about whether the report should be public so that part of your story sucked I was talking about what was included in the content of the report but go off with whatever makes your story crappier

I don't care if I sound like an old curmudgeon but social media is horrible and is a plague on society.

I think people also don't take into account the perniciousness and the pervasiveness of the internet and particularly social media. I have a friend who is a principal at a high school and the stories he tells me are horrifying. These kids just spin up new websites with new urls where they keep terrorizing other kids in the school, and part of his teams job is just following that around on the internet playing whack-a-mole. You can take your kid off social media (maybe?) and that's really hard in and of itself, but that doesn't make all of the social media go away and not impact their lives.