I think the thing they've argued before is that election integrity is an official act/policy area. It's obviously a stretch that they're engaged in election integrity work but with these courts who knows. No doubt it will be litigated and thus delay.
It's very possible that we've effectively been living under presumptive immunity for official acts for quite a while. The Obama drone strike example leveraged in the oral arguments is an example.
I could see them doing something specifically for trump and doing like they did in bush v gore and just say oh sorry bros no precedent here were just doing stuff we like
You may skip over it. You probably wouldnt skip over it of trump was on the left or if he was Bernie sanders's press secretary.
However "We" don't Skip over it.
If they didn't allow a replacement VP, then wouldn't' Maga Mike effectively be the VP as the third in line normally? Seems even more reason to not confirm someone if you're Unified Reich.
You seem to be suggesting that the folks the Dems saved from themselves a few months ago in order to govern wouldn't return the favor. Shocking they wouldn't do that.
They were using it as a drop on the local Detroit sports radio station yesterday. May be an indicator that it's breached the political nerd bubble and is out in broader culture.
Guy obsessed with posting antisemitic videos on this site, as evidenced by all of the antisemitic videos he posted on this site, advising others on time management.
I would generalize this to not only (but esp) the NYTimes but frankly most columnists. One of the accountability-free "professions" there is. I used to be super interested in NYtimes columns that crushed W or something like that back in the day but it doesn't take very long to figure out that it totally doesn't matter.
Thomas Friedman is the absolute worst.