I don’t shave my head so I can’t offer advice there.
I’ve used DSC and Harry’s. DSC was good and then quality started to decline. Harry’s always ended up nicking me so I dropped them quick.
Im going to go back to the old fashioned safety razor when I exhaust my current blades.
Good call as I could mirror it to my tv. That might be the only viable option. However if it's $85 as mentioned rather than $50, then the full directv package is not much more and that ain't happening.
We have a few PCs but the rest of our devices are ios. Guess MLB isn't going to get my money. It's short-sighted for MLB to have a blackout outside of 100 miles from the stadium.
Okay kids, this has probably been answered but I don't have the patience to seek out the answer. If I, a resident of Michigan, subscribe to MLBtv, am I still blacked out for Tigers games? If so, would having a VPN effectively mask my location so that I could watch Tigers games on my device(s)?
I refuse to pay for a tv service as we cut the cord five years ago.
Put my modded Harley Benton semi hollow body up for sale and said I’d be interested in trading for a MIJ guitar. Along came this 1989 MIJ strat with noiseless pickups.
Trade accepted.
I am one of the minority who really enjoys live albums (apparently they normally don't sell well). If a band has a live album, I will use that as my introduction to them.
On a similar note, there are bands that I have seen live who had previously underwhelmed me but, after seeing them live, I was turned into a fan. The live show is always what mattered to me. This is why if a studio album sounds raw and relatively unpolished, I will probably like that much more than if the album went thru the Phil Specter treatment.
I always wrote off Foo Fighters as dad rock. I had only heard the studio versions and, while the songs were good, they always seemed too polished and I prefer a more raw style of rock.
Then I saw/heard their Live from Wembley concert and I was all in. ALL in.