Jimbo

The suspension wasn't the only thing he did that was a dumb decision. Everything he did was harmless but it showed some immaturity. Just saying, seeing what his parents said and the fact that we have strong character personalities on this team made me feel better about his direction. If he turns out as a pro bowler or a very reliable WR is still to be determined. Now everyone loves Campbell and the direction the Lions have gone with high character players. Although it took some time for the fans and media to get on the bandwagon. These are situations why you want a strong locker room. Being a big bad boys fans. Rodman needed those high character players and coaches around him to keep him in line and flourish (Isiah, Jordan, Daily, Jackson,....etc). BTW I am not saying Jaymo is anything close to Rodman (as far as talent or a headcase), just using him as an extreme example. I feel like I am in the twilight zone and most decisions this team has made since getting rid of Quinn and Patricia has been about as good as you could expect. I think one of the underrated decisions was to bring on Spielman to help make these decisions.

What a complete moron. This is what happens when you don't have a good support group around you. Everyone was talking about the decisions Jaymo made and he did do some stupid stuff although after I heard his parents talk, it made me feel good that he had a good support system around him. Also the things he did weren't criminal, just dumb comments and not knowing the rules fully.

I guess the Titans are going for the geriatric WR team. Looks like Burks is out of the rotation there.

This could be one position that we look at the trade deadline. All depending on injuries and DPJ and green making an impact. I am definitely good with Boyd although I think he wants multiple years and not sure we want to do that.

Obviously there are a lot of dumb GM's in the NFL although I am not sure if Goff is thought of as a top 5 QB. To me, that was a dumb contract Atlanta gave Cousins (especially after their draft pick, injury history, and age). I think Goff needs us as much as we need him. Goff is average if he doesn't have a good line and weapons. There was that stretch between the Chicago games that he looked really bad. Or if you go to his start to being a Lion. BTW that is most of the QB's in history. How good is Purdy if he is on Carolina. Although I feel like if you put Purdy on our team, he will be just as good as he is with SF. Goff is going to get paid regardless, I just hope he realizes the cost (with other good players around him) to keep him a top 5 QB and is willing to take a little less. I think that is why there isn't a deal yet. His agent works for Goff and is trying to get the most but I think at some point Goff might tell his agent, OK I am good with a little less to stay on this team for the long term. Or maybe they are waiting for another big QB contract to put more desperation with the Lions. If the Lions give him that 4 years at 200mil or more, the Lions will be good and still compete for the Superbowl although if he is will to do 5 years at 210 or something similar, it could mean actually winning. It goes from being a normal contract for a QB to being a deal, and that is what helps franchises go from great to the best.

I think when Goff gets discussed on here or talk radio or even just amongst friends, it goes into great depth on what he does good and why he is a good or great QB. For his skill set, he is a top 10 QB (just based on his actual skill set and not his stats). My whole thing is how much you pay a QB can really put a franchise back or on pause. Now I do realize that if they sign him to a big contract, that contract in two to three years might not be that bad. Regardless, Goff's contract is going to prevent us from keeping certain players. How much is what I am hoping to avoid. I have seen this happen to so many franchises. Luckily I am not that worried about it because I have total faith in our organization to make the right call. I also don't want the fan support to cause the franchise to over pay for him which luckily again I don't think this current regime would do. That being said, the amount I feel like he should get is around 45mil a year (depending on the length). If he gets 50 or more, I won't be upset, although I will feel like he was overpaid. I also look at what I feel like other teams would pay for him if he was a free agent. Non of that matters if we win a Superbowl or are contenders for it for the next few years.

I just said pro bowler. I don't think whatever combo of guys they put on the line will be a non factor. If your coverage is better there is a lot more you can do up front to put pressure on the QB. I think the biggest factor will be what we do against mobile QBs. Which always seems to kill us. All of this is if the rookies and the guys they picked up in the off season are as good as predicted. Good thing is we also have some depth there. For me, this is the year Glenn needs to prove himself. He has more talent now, so the excuses are gone. I don't think it was Holme's strategy to have a deep secondary, its just the way the draft fell. That's why I like him. He went with talent and then when you have good coaches you have to flexibility to with your strengths. I would of been fine if Arnold was gone and Turner or Verse slipped more and went with them.

I am not anit-Goff. I am anti over paying for him. Saying he is a top 10 QB is not anti-Goff. I just don't want us to overpay. Luckily there is a lot of faith in Holmes. So if he decides hes worth 4 years 200 mil, I am good with that. If you see him wait and franchise him, I am good with that.

This is exactly what I am saying. I have never said that Hurts was a better QB than Goff. It definitely appeared that way two years ago. When I refereed to Philly, I was talking about winning to the SB in 2017 and still being relevant for multiple years with a different QB. Time will tell but the Hurts contract could of hurt (no pun intended) for a while. Philly stayed relevant until they got back to the SB last year by making smart picks even though they didn't have a high draft pick. Hurts was a 2nd round pick. Philly was relevant more because of the rest of the their roster and not because of the QB. I think Purdy is good but I don't think he is a top 10 QB. If SF decides to give him a huge contract they will be in a bad situation for a while. I want to keep Goff but not for a crazy amount. I think we would be better off franchising him and going with Hooker or someone else long term if Hooker isn't that guy.

I think if your a good to great GM, you can make some bold changes and still be relevant before your back in the mix for a super bowl. Something similar to what Philly did. The good thing about the Lions is that they had nothing and then built through the draft and have a lot of young players so I think their run will be longer. On the difficult end is they don't have that QB like MaHomes or Brady where you can still be a Superbowl contender in your down years. Goff is good but if you don't have players around him (especially an OL) you won't be a Superbowl contender. That is why I don't want to go crazy on his contract. If 3 years or less I am good for 50mil a year although if its more I don't want to pay more than 40-45 mil. If you do you could mortgage the future. I think he knows this and is why it might take a little longer to get a contract done.

I think having a good (and possibly great) secondary will be almost as helpful to Hutch as another high end edge rusher. You don't need another pro bowler on the opposite side when you have a good secondary. You can afford to blitz when you have better coverage. I am also curious how Campbell looks in his second year with a better secondary. If you look at the whole off season, our defense is significantly better.

I totally agree with you Cardinal. I've been saying this amongst friends and on here. What separates Holmes from other Lion's GM's and other current NFL GM's are the moves to get relevant and pro bowl players in spots that you're not supposed to. I don't remember a GM in recent Detroit sports history that is as complete and can find talent that others can't. Stevie looks like he has it from some of the Wings picks (and Tampa) although until they make the playoffs you can't even put him in the same category. The obvious picks aren't going to win you championships in the NFL. I actually think the most important picks to be relevant for a long time, are the depth picks because in the NFL, there are always injuries. The depth picks also allow you to let some guys go that are really good to great players although you can't pay everyone.

They should be considered when evaluating any QB. Goff is a top 10 QB and should be paid accordingly. Although his success is directly related to the quality of his offensive line like most QBs.

Next to the Goff stats should be the offensive line rankings as well

It'll definitely be interesting to see what Holme's draft will be his best 10 years from now. A lot of unknowns from last years draft still since its only 1 year. Does Hooker make any contribution (even if its a trade)? Does Sorsdal or Martin ever start? Can Green be a depth guy? To me though, the biggest question for this draft being his best will be if Cambell ends up being a prowl bowler. To be considered better than 2021. It would be interesting to compare his drafts with other great GM's. A lot would have to be considered.

There will for sure be people complaining with whoever they pick but I also think that is just what some people do. I have a few friends that just love to be negative or act like their negative. Last year was fun to listen to their roller coaster season. For me, having a competent GM made this draft less interesting because I actually have faith in Holmes. I have enjoyed looking at potential players but I am not invested in any of them based on mock drafts and what I think they should do. I have two players I am going to predict they take just for the fun of it though. I think they come out of this draft with DeJean or Legette.

Lion's had to pay Brown because of his low salary for 3 years. I don't think you have to pay Goff $50 because it will be his third big contract. I could be wrong but I think Goff should be good with taking less (maybe $45 mil a year) if he wants to continue being protected (which he clearly needs to be successful). Maybe he will take less to get more years, like 5 years $200 mil.

The Lions are now at the point where your not just picking for actual starters but depth and future starters. If you can draft position you are strong at (like the OL) but can replace a high salary player 1-3 years from now and also have quality depth in case of an injury, its just as good as picking a starter. That's why drafts are hard to grade even 1 year from the actual draft. It's going to be very hard to find starter in the draft now. CB, K, S, WR (X position) and maybe edge are really the only spots you can really draft a player better than what we already have at the spot we are picking. Not saying it can't happen (especially with Holmes trading history) and we know Holmes can do it, it just will be very difficult. I just don't think this draft is a failure if they don't find an immediate starter. Even if you draft a CB, chances they are starting day 1 is not a guarantee.

There is no way Goff or Stafford should be considered a top 3 Lion of all time. If Goff wins 3 Superbowl's I still will not think he should be a top 3 Lion of all time. This isn't to bash Goff or Stafford. Both are very good to great QB's although they have not even been considered or will be considered a top 3 QB in any of their seasons in the NFL. Now if we're clearly talking about fan favorites, then it is definitely a possibility with Goff because he is the QB. For me, to be considered a top player of any franchise history you have to be considered one of the best at that position in that league (very least in a given year if not all time). In the NFL, I don't think its easy to compare winning percentages to identify if a player is better or not because there are so many other factors. So that being said, I do think Stafford is a better QB over all (although it's very close).

On pure talent you have to go with Barry and Calvin for sure. Top 3 (or close) at their position to ever play the game. Also very exciting to watch and you would pay just to see them. These are guys that could of even been better if they were on teams that were more complete teams. How long do you go back for. Lane would have to be the third if when they played doesn't matter. The only current Lion that I think will be considered 5-10 years from now would be Hutch. Sewel has a chance since by a lot of people he is considered a top tackle right now and could be considered as a top 10 all time if he gets better. Although its really hard to put anybody on the O-line as a top 3 best for any team.

Every draft is fluid and that's why its impossible to predict trades. If you asked Holmes to predict trades he is going to make now he wouldn't be able to predict correctly. Every pick and every player taken changes the course of the draft and actually future drafts (because you can use future picks). Its fun to try and predict though. If I were to make a bet, I think he will trade back but not too far for a 4th this year because they don't have one. Would love if they could get DeJean, Coleman, or Legette with a trade down.

I think its simple with Kool-aid. If they draft him at 29 or after a trade, that means Holmes did his research and found the rumors about him false. He's not a perfect GM (no one is) although I do feel like he wouldn't pick someone that doesn't put the effort in to be great. If they pass on him with whatever pick then the rumors are true. He is clearly a talented cover corner although you can get away with just talent in college, you need that combined with effort in the NFL.

I thought as well for a while that there is no way the Lions trade out of the first round when they are drafting. After more thought, with this regime there are no hand cuffs. So if its the right move, Holmes would trade out of the first round. Now if I were to make a bet if they stay at 29, trade up, or trade down. I would say they stay at 29. It's impossible to know because there are so many factors. How many players have Holmes 1rst round grades is I think the most important. Last year I think they had 12 players (correct me if I am wrong) with first round grades. If its something similar (or less) and those players are getting drafted, I think they will trade up if it doesn't cost them too much. If they feel like this draft is top heavy but has depth, I think they will trade down. I know every draft is different but I felt the Minnesota trade to get Jaymo didn't cost them that much. Although they had that early 2nd round pick and a lot of draft capital. Now if they have a lot of players that are 1rst round grades that they feel others don't, then I think they will stay at 29. I don't remember or not sure if they told us, but did they consider LaPorta and Branch first round grades?

The thing I really like about Holmes is he beats to his own drum. He isn't influenced or worried about what kind of draft grades he gets. Because he's made a lot of bold moves, everyone thinks that will continue. I also think there is a good possibility that he makes a pick the mock drafters have him taking. The chances that he keeps on finding the diamond in the rough every time is not realistic although his batting average is about as good as it gets with a GM. He will also make the pick that everyone thinks he should make (like Branch). As much as everyone says he goes BPA, I also think he does consider position and what the team needs are. Good thing is there is a lot of depth in positions that we can approve. I don't say need because when your a good team, you have players at every position that can play. When your a good team, your looking for depth and upgrades at every position. There is also thinking about the future and the fact that your not going to be able to sign everyone. Don't think in this draft he's going to be able to upgrade RB or even really add depth (maybe in the later rounds). So even though he might have a higher grade for a RB than a CB/Safety, that RB isn't going to be an upgrade over Gibbs or Montgomery although CB's/Safeties, WR's, OL, .....etc have more roster spots. So there is a better chance for that player to play sooner. That being said, I am hoping for 2 defensive players (any combination or CB, Safety, Edge, DT) and one offensive player (WR or OL) in the first three rounds if there are no trades.

I really love that we finally have a GM that can draft. He is definitely going to go BPA. Even the past three years he has and we had a lot more holes. The draft is where you find your stars and going BPA is how you find them. Its very rare to find the franchise player in FA and if you do your going to have to over pay. FA is where you plug your holes and its so refreshing to finally hear a GM say that. That being said, it is nearly impossible to predict. I would love if the Lions could get Latu if he either dropped (because of injuriy concerns) or if they traded up. Would love to get someone that could take some pressure off of Hutch (so either Robinson would be good if they stayed in their spot). DT Murphy from Texas is another going around the same range. I would also be good if we went with a receiver (Thomas, Mitchell). If I had to make a prediction on the pick I would say Kool-aid.