mtutiger

Extra pitches and, to an extent, probably a win or two mixed in. The hitting woes aren't going to resolve themselves overnight, but FFS, at least go out and field your position better than a little leaguer

Can the pitching staff file a class action lawsuit against the hitters / fielders?

Exactly. I'm also old enough to remember when Tyler Nevin was raking against AAA pitching, only to get the call to Detroit and become a punchline with the fanbase. People are badly underestimating that possibility with Huira... we've seen this movie before. It's an unsatisfying answer to the impulses of the fanbase, who apparently would love nothing more than the DFA the guy apparently, but the best version of the 2024 Detroit Tigers (and future Detroit Tigers teams) is one where Spencer Torkelson is meeting or exceeding expectations. We can all be frustrated and disappointed with his start thus far while recognizing this fact.

Jobe seems like a key factor to me on that front.... if he moves quickly and were to manage to start to knock on the door of the big leagues (not completely out of the question), it opens up some possibilities IMO

I wouldn't be surprised if they shopped some pitchers for bats, quite honestly. Especially if they remain relatively close in the division.

When the situation changes to the point where the opportunity cost of giving up on the 1-1 player is lower than it is to roll with another option. Keston Huira, who tbf may or may not still have something to prove in the big leagues, just isn't gonna move the needle on that front. Not even close. It's going to take some combination of time and lack of improvement along with another legit option opening up (either internally, through trade or in a future offseason)... until that changes, they are going to see what they have. And are right to do so.

I would add that there was a lot of teeth gnashing by folks last season complaining about Colt Keith not getting called up.... now that he's here, he's not only bad, but he's worse at the dish than Torkelson is (ie. the guy everyone wants to apparently send to Toledo and/or DFA). It's not a defense of Tork, he has to be much better. His piss poor defense the last couple of weeks was sort of a breaking point for me. Having said that, like Mike McMahon during the Joey Harrington era, the next hot thing down in Toledo isn't always the answer.

Not on the 40 man.... who gets DFA'd?

No argument there...

For sure, the bullpen was due for one of these....

Correct. Although he's going to need to improve his defense over what we've seen so far, because if his ceiling is lower offensively, he's a lot more expendable if he cannot play the field.

And the wheels fall off.... my goodness

Chris McCoskey's guy coming in lol

Really good start on balance for Reese Olson... Would be nice if literally someone would provide a little offensive support

I'd be really upset if they overturned that.... bizarre play

CB Bucknor's zone is nuts today

I would imagine mostly 35-49 and 49-64.... he draws about 10 mil/day still

An interview with the Times probably has some effects indirectly (ie. coverage in other media, how journalists on cable cover / detail the interview, etc.), but in terms of direct contact, this is unironically true.

He did do an interview with The New Yorker around the SOTU, so it's not like hasn't done one with a legacy outlet recently. I think it's less about his abilities and more about the fact that he just doesn't like or care for The New York Times and doesn't want to give them the time. Whether it's the right posture or not is another matter... like Boehner said in his memoir, sometimes you gotta feed the alligators, and I agree with you that he'd probably be better off just doing it and letting the chips fall where they may.

Doesn't count, not the NYT

Yeah, that was my immediate thought, attendance will likely be higher than a typical game on account of the draft one would think

Part of the problem with political reporting, and it's certainly not exclusive to the NYT at this point although they are the biggest offender, is that it all feels outsourced to polling. The "shoeleather" stuff isn't actually being on the ground trying to find out what people are talking about, it's the paper hiring a polling outfit to do a poll, and then having the political folks do a large writeup on said poll and drawing sweeping conclusions. And then sending the reporters out into the field to interview folks on the basis of whatever the polling results are. Obviously old school political reporting can be informed by hard data, and certainly reporters shouldn't be drawing conclusions off of random interactions in the field, but often times it just seems like the data does all the driving and reporters just work backwards. And that really seems mailed in. 100%, it's all about the brand. I think it's a fair discussion to have as to whether Biden is out giving independent interviews enough, but the sense of entitlement that the Times demonstrates is off-putting regardless. Especially in a time when other publications in the industry who don't have the resources that the Times has are facing existential challenges

I disagree. The standard they hold themselves to is that of being the "Paper of Record"... the revelations in this piece were credible and likely well sourced, and they really cut against the brand that they have for years cultivated. Particularly when their reporters came out on social media in a defensive posture after this piece dropped, it was fait accompli that they would have to respond. Although I'm not sure the response is going to help a whole lot. None of this is existential obviously, but I'm sure for a lot of readers, it definitely clarified or confirmed some things that were pretty evident about their political coverage in recent years.

Quite a ratio for this one... and well deserved

Games 25 thru 45 for the 2003 Tigers below: Had themselves a nice 4 game winning streak after starting 3-25.... mostly at the expense of the O's