chasfh

Not the first time Cramer has done this kind of thing. Remember when Jon Stewart had him on his show and got Cramer to break down and basically apologize for his role in being a PR arm for Wall Street and leading investors into the teeth of the stock monster in 2008? Then Cramer went on some other NBC property, maybe the Today Show, the next day to talk about how unfair Stewart was and recast the segment as him putting Stewart straight. Net net: no lesson learned. And now we have this. I'm guessing Cramer will recast his apology yesterday into something self-exonerating soon enough.

The red hats are already convinced and are shoveling their money in Trump's direction, so SS guy doesn't have to testify.

What's twice a week?

How’s this for an October surprise! I honestly don’t know how Trump getting immediately unbanned from Twitter would cook the election.

The last franchise quarterback the Lions drafted yielded three wild card losses and nine playoff misses in his 12 years here.

Do you believe this? I don't.

Not only has the South won the peace after losing the war, they are apparently still engaging the peace.

If the Phillies can somehow manage to beat the Astros in the Series, they will be the team with the third-worst record to win a ring—and the team with the worst-record to have not beaten the Tigers on their way to the ring.

Leading to the Contract on America ...

Great. Just in time to hand it all over to the Republicans so they can claim credit, then crash it again and blame Democrats.

I was just thinking something like that ... "Too bad Meadows doesn't have a wife on the Supreme Court ..."

Indeed. I'm not advocating for a mandated set of criteria writers must use to vote on MVP. It's basically up to the individual writer. If I had a vote, I wouldn't take the team's record into account.

The other thing with Pudge is that he played on a 1/10 with the Marlins in 2003 and then demanded a 4/40 to re-sign with them, and they countered with a slight pay cut instead. With a publicly established floor of 4/40, and the Tigers the only organization to make that offer, he basically had to take our deal, I believe to more or less save face.

A baseball player’s inability to single-handedly will his team to victory light after night, despite being surrounded by mediocrity, is a key reason I don’t think a team’s record should factor into his MVP vote.

Diana Sare is running for governor for the fucking LaRouche Party, so ... yeah.

I hadn't heard that. Zero chance.

I have a mild ... mild ... concern that the coverage of the debate, if not the actual debate itself, will cast competency aspersions on Fetterman enough to either move independent votes to Oz or keep easily-embarrassed D voters home, tipping the scales to Oz. That in itself would be bad, but in that case the downhill effect might also be to tip the governor race to Mastriano, who gets to hire his Secretary of State beholden to him, which allows them to fix the 2024 election for Trump/R candidate, that is the difference in R winning the presidency. Very, very small possibility, although ...

I know we’re in the middle of the moment, but that is by and large a bad take. Almost 55 million students are enrolled in public and private schools. There have been 121 students killed in schools this year. That’s about a 1 in 450,000 chance that a student will be killed while at school. That’s a far lower chance than the average person has of being killed in America regardless of locale. But in an era when the news business model is “scare the hell out of everyone”, it’s the prevalence of this kind of reporting that leads to bad policy like arming teachers and on-duty cops on campus.

It was a very, very bad look for her to blame staff for putting it out unvetted. It was so transparent when she said that that it was a bare-faced lie.

Agree.

I did a whole FG fan post on this when Bryce Harper was on the market: https://community.fangraphs.com/the-income-tax-implications-of-bryce-harpers-choice-of-next-team/ You will certainly enjoy just how utterly off I was with my prediction in the middle of it. 😁

I just posted a big ol’ epistle on this, but I still can’t imagine any market conditions that would lead Correa to accept five years from a team that he believes will be sub-.500 for at least a couple more years. Perhaps if it’s the only offer he gets. That was my response to a suggestion of a 5/200 offer to him, which got this whole sidebar started.

Last year’s win-loss might not matter per se, and after all the management moves that we made, the Tigers are definitely going in the right direction. That might be attractive to some free agents. On the other hand, the organization is still scraping the bottom at this moment, new hires notwithstanding, and I believe the general perception is that it will take a few years before the Tigers can get into the position of perennial contender. Maybe as few as two, which would be great, but I’d guess three at minimum; perhaps more like four; hopefully not five or more, because that would be a problem. Is a top-tier player like Correa willing to wait that long? Depends on the player, right? We know of players who would go through a wall to win a ring, and nothing else will do. While those are the guys who might take the slightly less lucrative offer to win a ring right now, we’re probably not in contention for a player like that for 2023. There are other players who may not be super-driven to win a ring and nothing else. Players who instead enjoy their career, the lifestyle, and playing the game itself, and that winning would be a nice-to-have more than a have-to-have-or-else. We don’t know who many of those guys are because they don’t usually talk like that in public, but the absence of hyper-competitive talk from them might be a clue. I have suspected for some years now that Mike Trout might be like that. Is Carlos Correa like that? Not sure, and I can’t find any quotes from him from when he was signed with the Twins. So, maybe? Another factor, besides the single-minded focus to win, might be what a player knows of the organization, because as with any profession, people in it share stories amongst themselves. Is the clubhouse filled with good guys, good teammates, motivated players? Is it a good place to play and generally pursue your profession as a ballplayer? Before this season we might have agreed that the Tigers were not. We were a complete mess, and to attract top free agents we had to either overpay (Eduardo?) or be the last one standing (Baez?). Now, though, with the new PBO hire and especially the movements made in the last couple of days, the Tigers must look a lot more interesting to free agents, which might have been one of the objectives Harris was trying to accomplish with all the moves all at once now, followed by the press conference. I agree the city of Detroit is not as much of a factor in itself, although it could serve as a tiebreaker criterion in a situation like, similar money, Yankees vs Tigers. How this all adds up for Correa this winter, I’m not sure. I guess we have a shot, although I do think more teams will be in for Correa than those that have FA SS right now. I don’t think the Yankees would let Kiner-Falefa block their desire to bring Correa aboard, nor would the Phillies like Bryson Stott block him, or maybe even the Cubs with Nico Hoerner, if they really wanted him. As for those contenders you named, we would go through all the same questions for whatever FA SS Correa would displace as we would with Correa. The final two considerations are whether the Tigers will meet whatever Correa’s long-term demands are, which I assume will be roughly what they were last winter; and whether we are willing to commit to another super long-term deal after the very public failure of long-term deals this organization has recently done. The wild card is whether Correa would accept another Twins-like deal from the Tigers. That’s possible, but with another year having passed in his career, I gotta think pretty unlikely. My conclusion/prediction is that the Tigers won’t make a serious long-term offer for Correa, probably because we’re not close enough to winning in the next up-to-three years to justify it, and that we will roll with Baez-to-Schoop-to-TORK!? next year. I’d love to see a premier SS come here and push Baez to 2B, though.

Terrific. Good to know. 😉😅 So you agree that players take other considerations such as winning organization into account, and that they do not always take the offer that’s simply the most money, which was the original hypothesis. I’m on board with that idea as well. Now we’re just negotiating to what degree.

It’s even worse because all the Republican commercials are so god damned apocalyptic.