chasfh

Most apps allow you to fix that in Settings.

He has definitely earned another start tonight against no matter who.

Hill gets a save and Wingenter gets the win. Who had that on their bingo card?

Jesus, Hill went pecker high in on Alvarez twice in a row and almost got a double play out of it.

Gulp Garrett Hill

Obviously not.

Nice to get two runs here. We have some life after all.

I think it would have taken a plus defender in left to reliably catch that ball.

The other part of the problem was that TORK! rushed the throw. He had a ton of time where he could have almost leisurely taken a step to the left and fired to Baez to the left of the bag. Instead he got excited and hurried the throw. Rookie mistake. He will replay that in his mind over and over and then develop a strategy for the next time that happens.

I just got home in time to see Lange. He was brilliant up to the 0-2 double. He got a boatload of swings and misses on stuff way outside the zone from some of the game’s best hitters. Just the two fly outs from Peña and Abreu they missed on, but also, no walks. Run notwithstanding, good outing.

Oh, holy shit on a stick ...

I think the honeymoon for A.J. Hinch ended a long, long time ago for a lot of fans, many of whom want to see him fired, like, now.

Who is Greg Eno and why should I care what he has to say about the Tigers?

I wonder whether any of this might be a case of any combination of not following the team closely, not understanding how leadership dynamics work, and perhaps not a little wishful thinking maybe even connected to wistfulness over Leyland's exile.

Thanks. Shows you how much I follow cabinet politics.

What do we expect? For-profit news goes where the eyeballs want.

Well, Secret Service is part of the IRS, so that definitely tracks.

In a country that fethisizes cutthroat competition and frontier-like self-reliance? Not a chance. Doctors would take fee payments in chickens first.

I think the only way Harris fires Hinch is if Hinch goes off book and starts doing things that go against Harris's plans. Once that verifiably starts happening, I'll come around to your way of thinking on this. If, for example, one of Harris's plans is to micromanage the lineup and have Hinch run the same eight guys out there night after night, but Hinch continues to mix and match anyway against Harris's will, then I see your point. But if Harris is giving Hinch free rein to run the team on the field as Hinch sees fit, then I just don't see Harris firing Hinch over something as low impact as failed mixing and matching—as though Hinch is losing scads of winnable games this talented team is playing.

It's nice to be in the top half of the league in something positive for a change!

I don't believe this is true at all. Assuming there's no personal fallout between him and Harris, Hinch's honeymoon won't be over until he is given the players that he is expected to contend with and then fails to do so. Until that happens, Hinch won't get fired even if the team ends up losing 105 games this year. What would be the point of firing him over that? It's not as though they could give this exact same team to, for example, Jim Leyland and expect him to win with them in a way Hinch can't.

We simply don't have eight everyday players Hinch can run out there night after night. Blame him, blame Harris, blame Avila, blame Ilitch, blame anyone and everyone, but that's the fact, and A.J. can't reasonably pretend otherwise.

OK, that's cool. I'm not saying at all this is definitely you, and at the risk of going a little out of bounds here, there is a general populist movement to dismiss everything all media reports as being fake. And in some cases that's true, particularly when people try to pass off opinion or ideology as being verifiable fact. But I think that happens only in cases for which there is a clear incentive to lie, and I just don't see the Detroit sports media's incentive to lie on behalf of the organization on the specific question of whether Hinch was involved in Harris's hiring—as though the organization would want to lead fans to believe that Hinch was involved when in fact he had zero involvement. What would be their incentive to make that happen? And how would Hinch, presumably a trusted agent of change for the team, agree to forfeit his actual agency and allow that? I can't fathom any incentive for him to do this, either.

And then there's this: https://theathletic.com/3613278/2022/09/20/tigers-scott-harris-president-baseball-operations/ But again, feel free to discard this and believe whatever you want. Also, feel free to root for A.J.'s dismissal. I think you'll be disappointed, though.

That's fine, you can believe the media in your head versus the actual media and their journalism.