-
Posts
22,988 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
172
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by chasfh
-
This is why you know nothing about what "the left" is thinking.
-
Why isn’t this on the Conservative Self-Owns account?
-
As long as it’s uncoordinated and beholden to private enterprise actually doing the legwork, probably not.
-
I can’t imagine Putin playing the supplicant role, so I think your hope is well-founded.
-
I think one difference is that the US and Europe would probably be willing to help Russia get on its feet democratically, given their strategic location in Europe—something US/Europe wouldn’t spend as much time on for Libya.
-
-
I'm not speeding. And I would appreciate it if you wouldn't lay on the horn the next time I pass you. 😉
-
I doubt we can convince Correa that we will not still be rebuilding next year. The Tigers said they would compete this year and look what's happened, and everyone on the Tigers looks miserable playing out the string. Correa is surely noticing that. I don't think the Tigers could overpay Correa enough to get him to come here, I don't think Baby Doc would offer to overpay him enough to get here, and I can't imagine any way Correa would be forced to take a Tigers offer in the aftermath of no other team bidding on what is still the best shortstop in the game.
- 3,276 replies
-
- 81+ wins
- tork and greene
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
That may be the only thing we can hope for, for next year at least. Baby Doc committed nearly a quarter billion dollars to free agents this past winter and all he's gotten for it so far is a team careening towards 100 losses. I could see him shying away from big ticket free agents for a little while.
- 3,276 replies
-
- 81+ wins
- tork and greene
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Carlos Correa is on record as not wanting to sign with a rebuilding team, so that eliminates the Tigers this winter.
- 3,276 replies
-
- 81+ wins
- tork and greene
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Once again, I think it might depend on how consistent and persistent they make the messaging. They’re obviously off to a rocky start. But then, Republicans also got off to a rocky start on the whole 2020 election debacle, believing it was their golden opportunity to finally throw Trump under the bus, and they’ve been largely whipped into line. So I’m not spiking the football on this quite yet.
-
The idea was always the investigation itself. The imprimatur of legitimacy is all they really wanted in order to keep the flame alive so they could trade off it.
-
Voters have short memories, especially voters who want to believe. They need to keep being reminded of this, because those voters will forget.
-
Voters forget if they’re not constantly reminded.
-
Hope not, but I also think it might depend on how consistent and persistent they make the messaging. If Republicans can completely replace the image of 10-year-old girls needing to go out of state for abortion with the vision of Democrats snapping the necks of live babies in order to abort them, while promoting a reasonable abortion cutoff that is more lenient than even some European socialist paradises, they could potentially change the entire discussion from “Democrats=Pro-choice/Republicans=forced births” to “Republicans=reasonable abortion policy/Democrats=abort already-birthed babies”. It might be a tall order to expect Republicans to all successfully message in the exact same disciplined way, but Democrats should probably already be figuring out to defend against this possibility and keep reminding people what Republicans’ actual abortion policy is, i.e., “abortion is murder, period.” Democrats simply cannot afford to look the other way and let Republicans take control of abortion messaging.
-
So, I’ll tell you why I am resurrecting this today … After watching the Tigers get shut out at Comerica last night and still managing a good night’s sleep at the Greenfield, I was on my way back to Broad Shoulders this morning. On 94, just west of AA, I’m driving among a fast-moving bunch of cars when I see a “left lane closed ahead one mile” sign, and most people start moving over right away. You know I’m a late merger, so as soon as the guy ahead of me moved over, there was a lot of daylight for maybe half a mile up to where we couldn’t see any more road because it was the top of a low grade hill. Know what I mean? Point is, we drivers could not see the closure yet—presumably it was beyond the low grade hill we were approaching. But since there was daylight in my lane, I planned on driving ahead to where the closure is and merging in there. Just as I was starting out, a guy a few cars ahead of me started edging back into my lane. I thought maybe he was going to late merge with me, so I hung back to let him get ahead of me and lead me there. But instead, he started driving half in his lane and half in mine. I understood what he was trying to do here. There was still plenty enough daylight to his left so I could still pass him, and as I did, he laid on his horn, and when I could see him in the rear view, he was gesticulating and yelling in my direction. Corporal Lapdog was definitely unhappy with me. Here’s the best part: once we got to the top of the low grade hill and could see the rest of the road, turns out there was no lane closure after all. Maybe it was an old one where they hadn’t taken down the “lane close ahead” sign. Or maybe they were going to close it soon. All I know is, the left lane wasn’t closed for us. So all these people early-merged and slowed everything down for what they thought was a closed lane a mile away that no one could see, but that wasn’t even there. Early merging culture sucks.
-
I think the only idea here is not to actually pass such a bill, but to reset the abortion argument with Republican voters. By settling on 15 weeks, he’s trying to make Republicans look reasonable to the moderate right who can’t bring themselves to vote for MAGA and won’t vote for Democrats. It’s strictly a gambit to goose turnout. If Republicans could win on this message they will ignore the 15-week thing and outright ban it everywhere they can anyway—the idea isn’t to negotiate the end product, but to win the election, full stop. If Republican candidates can all get on board and stay on this message, I could see it working.
-
09/13/2022 6:40 EDT Houston Astros at Detroit Tigers
chasfh replied to casimir's topic in Game Threads
I would think you could try chris, christopher, chris.ilitch, christopher.ilitch, cilitch, ci … at least one of them should get there. -
09/12/2022 6:40 EDT Houston Astros at Detroit Tigers
chasfh replied to casimir's topic in Game Threads
-
I love how he was flailing about and then all of a sudden just stopped and let his buddies flip him over. I definitely want to know how they communicated “Hey! Hey! Calm down!” to him.
-
It would take me exactly half a nanosecond to decide to vote for Al Franken for president.
-
These are essentially the same players we are losing 100 games with right now. Looks like you might be suggesting the problem isn’t the players themselves, but some combination of bad (current) coaching and bad luck? That an immediately-changed approach to player development and a karma reset can save this crop of guys? Does that basically sum it up?
- 3,276 replies
-
- 81+ wins
- tork and greene
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
09/12/2022 6:40 EDT Houston Astros at Detroit Tigers
chasfh replied to casimir's topic in Game Threads
I’ll be there with my wife, meeting my brother and his lovely spouse. It’s my at-least-once-a-year annual trip to Comerica preceded by a short detour to the potato chip factory.
