Jump to content

chasfh

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    22,988

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    172

 Content Type 

Everything posted by chasfh

  1. chasfh
    Say what you want about high cost and signal reliability and all that, but one clear advantage to having DirecTV is that I’ve been able to get them to throw me Sunday Ticket gratis the last few years in a row.
  2. chasfh
    Maybe religion is involved?
  3. chasfh
  4. chasfh
    Definitely might as well put in someone they won’t like. I don’t see how it will hurt us.
  5. chasfh
    Trump sure got his money's worth out of appointing this LILF.
  6. chasfh
    Oops ...
  7. chasfh
    You're right: I don't know anything about Slater, his management style, his relationship to the owner or his front office or the Cardinals manager, or any of it. Frankly, that's a pretty high requirement to hold me to in order for me to post an opinion about it. If that's the bar we're being held to, then heck, might as well just shut down the whole forum right now, because all it is is we members posting opinions about people none of us know personally. All I know is what I see on his topline resume, which looks very similar to Al Avila's in terms of scouting background, and speaking only for myself and what I would like to see, I don't want anyone whose background is primarily scouting to be the Tigers' next GM. We just had one of those, and I don't care for how it worked out, so I'd like to try a different direction this time. YMMV.
  8. chasfh
    That's a fair reply—although I wouldn't hold up Brennan Boesch results as the goal, since he also had only the one decent production year that Baddoo has ... 😏. Point being, I don't think it's too much a surprise that Baddoo has done a faceplant this year.
  9. chasfh
    There can be no way you seriously believe I was suggesting that they base their hire on maintaining their current system.
  10. chasfh
    He lingered for five seasons in another organization, never getting above A+, so perhaps it's not so baffling when considering that?
  11. chasfh
    Hinch and Garko are both very recently from outside the organization, as opposed to practically everyone at the top of the front office who has been ossifying there for a decade or two. I don't know what getting a third-party consultant to lead the search, and who does not have the intrinsic understanding of the Tigers' system that certainly Hinch and perhaps Garko do by now, would add to the process.
  12. chasfh
    Stavenhagen confirmed on his podcast that both A.J. and Ryan Garko will be very involved in the GM search, and Petzold, Woodbery, and Beck have all confirmed that Ilitch said Hinch will be involved. Given the unique state of this team, particularly the incompetence of the ownership and front office in terms of how baseball is run today, as well as these two guys being practically the only key people in the organization having any experience at winning organizations, I'd be alarmed if they weren't involved.
  13. chasfh
    His career looks not unlike Al Avila’s: scouting director background, emphasis in St Louis on player procurement, long tenure, zero mention of analytics or decision sciences—e.g., baseball man. His topline resume doesn’t seem to address the Tigers’ most glaring need, which is integrating analytics into performance analysis, biomechanics, and health recovery and maintenance. Thank you, pass.
  14. chasfh
    Even with the benefit of a mental health leave available, a lot of workers aren't comfortable yet asking for one. There's some work to do to get workers comfortable with the idea. This might be one benefit in which the employers are actually ahead of the employees when it comes to acceptance. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/paid-leave-covers-mental-health-days-but-stigma-still-clouds-use
  15. chasfh
    I can see why you'd be hesitant to just assume that nobody from a blue collar industry can avail themselves of help when they need it. Tens of millions of working people definitely cannot, though, and with that in mind, that's why I said I could see what @gkelly meant.
  16. chasfh
    So you're the TikTok guy?!
  17. chasfh
    True though this may be, there are also tens of millions of working people who can't take advantage of mental health leaves at all. Retail clerks, restaurant workers, rideshare drivers, truck drivers, general maintenance and repair workers, CSRs, farm workers, security guards, at-will sales reps, and basically anyone working in the gig economy, a lot of whom are subbing in for a white-collar job that might normally afford this as a benefit. If people working these kinds of jobs know or suspect they have mental health issues, they simply plow through it so the income can keep flowing, because if they don't, it won't. Many of us college-educated white-collar professionals tend to forget how absent this kind of safety net is for too many folks.
  18. chasfh
    You may have missed my post from a couple days ago saying that as well.
  19. chasfh
    If it's not considered incorrect, I would think at one time it was, but this usage has become so ubiquitous that no one notices it anymore. I would guess copy editors don't look for this at all.
  20. chasfh
    Maybe for certain higher-level employee classes at some white collar industries.
  21. chasfh
    NOTE: this is a grammar pet peeve, not a political pet peeve … In this morning’s paper, Clarance Page wrote of Biden’s speech this week: “Like Biden I know that all Republicans are not MAGA-red-to-the-bone Trump loyalists.” So, are you saying no Republicans are that? That all, meaning 100%, of Republicans are definitely not that? Or did you mean to say “Not all Republicans are MAGA-red-to-the-bone Trump loyalists”? And this guy writes for a living …
  22. chasfh
    Who’s John Lester? 😉
  23. chasfh
    This is a little harsh, but I see what you mean. It’s defensible to be irked at the idea of someone being practically celebrated for something that would lose most people their jobs. The difference here is that Austin Meadows is a star employee, and star employees in some industries have the ability to leverage their star status to obtain this kind of leeway, while the vast majority of us do not. I’m pretty sure this same industry would not give this kind of leeway to Zack Short or Jacob Barnes, guys who are a couple bad games from having their careers end for them, anyway. File that one under “Life Ain’t Fair”, I guess.
  24. chasfh
    Exactly. They are public personalities by choice, and part of that bargain is that people talk in public about them. They can’t expect that we regular people will only cheer for them, and shut the hell up about them otherwise. Life in the fame lane doesn’t work that way. It’s not as though our speculating into what’s happening behind the scenes on some no-account message board is breaching their privacy or inhibiting their comeback. And besides, I don’t recall anyone here being disrespectful to either Rodriguez or Meadows, even if we are wrong about what’s going on behind the scenes which, given the recent tendency of the press to respect public figures’ private affairs, we’ll probably never know, anyway.
  25. chasfh
    If it were painkiller addiction Meadows was dealing with, would he be hanging around the clubhouse and dugout every day, as he has said he has been and will continue to? Painkiller addiction sounds urgent enough to have to take time away from the team to address immediately. Otherwise, either he’s putting his addiction on pause to hang around the team for the next month, or it’s not a serious-enough problem to address immediately even though it’s serious enough to prevent him from playing.
×
×
  • Create New...