Tiger337

Trump himself bragged about forcibly kissing women and grabbing their pussies. It sounds to me like he was admitting to crimes even though he doesn't think such crimes pertain to him. Just this week, there was a video of him trying to kiss a teenage girl on the lips and then seemingly pulling her hand into his crotch area. She pulled away from him.

An editorial written by an individual giving a nuanced view on a paticular issue is educational. An editorial saying that the entire newspaper is supporting Harris just makes the newspaper look unbiased. I'd prefer not to see it even if I agree with it.

Of course they aren't. They both have different groups of people they court and thus different issues that they pretend to care about. Most of the Blacks I know don't think either party respects them, but they know they at least have a chance at status quo with the Democrats.

I have no problem with the Washington Post not allowing the endorsement. That is not the job of newspapers. Their job should be to report unbiased news. A stupid endorsement is not going to change anything anyway. I like Amazon Prime and will continue to use it.

Black unemployment was very low under Trump too and it had little to do with either one of them.

I have no doubt that he has been sexually assaulting women his entire life. He has no morals nor inhibitions and has always had access to beautiful women his entire life due to his family wealth. Why do people think he bought three beauty pageants? That doesn't mean that all the accusations are true, but it means I don't feel bad for him either way.

I'm on your side Cecil. Just not so fanatic.

I am confident that Blacks know that neither side gives a **** about them and that they'll continue to vote for the side which is not openly hostile. The problem there is getting them to vote at all.

Yes, I've noticed that you are consistnt in not trusting polls. I probably shouldn't have used you as an example.

This forum in general.

Young men love Trump and they probaby didn't vote in the last election.

"Bad data for my preferred candidate, so not paying attention"

Yes, I thnk that Trump has probably sexually assaulted many women, but posters like Krassenstein are not believable and only weaken the case against Trump.

Of course they are, but if we are trying to predict who is going to win the election, the number of donors might be relevant.

I didn't say they were the violent side. I said the violence MAY be instigated by the left. If we get a right wing sweep, there won't be much reason for the right to get violent. It will start out as protests, but protests can get violent. It won't sit well with a lot of people that the President atempted a coup four years before. Lots of people on the left have weapons. 20% of Democrats own guns, and it only takes a fraction of a percent to make trouble. But there is one reason we might not have much violence. Men are the violent ones and the majority of the men in the country will be thrilled by a Trump presidency.

What was dismissed was the level of right wing violence you predicted. There have been pockets here and there, but nowhere close to what you predicted. Not yet anyway. I think the next four years are going to be ugly if Trump wins, but the ugly stuff may be instigated by the left. I wouldn't blame them, but just saying.

He is great for billionaires if they can manipulate him which seems not very difficult. They might not like him so much if his chaos starts to affect them negatively.

Where is 84lives these days? Keith will be the next Rogers Hornsby!

Bezos has more wealth than the entire United States treasury. I think he can find a way to get Trump out of the way if need be. Then again, Mush does too.

I'm not even sure they'd want to hire me here at my age. So, I'm hoping to keep my job for a few more years until I am ready for retirement.

No, I mean if people are worried that Orange Hitler is planning to have people killed, I think the big companies would discourage that and I think they have more influence in our county than political wonks are willing to admit.

That's the worst thing about Trump. I have no confidence that he is on my side. I mean if he wouldn't even keep his VP safe, why would I think he's going to keep anyone else safe? I view him as the enemy and I have never felt that way about any President regardless of how much I disagreed with them.

I feel like the super wealthy who own this country would not be interested in mass extermination. That wouldn't be good for business. Would it?

Bring back the Expos and I'm sold!

I wouldn't leave the country over politics which is why I am not thinking of leaving. Intellectually, this country is dead to me now. There is little interest among the masses in science or truth or any of the principles which guide my life. However, it is still a good place for me to live my day to day life. At my age, I would only leave if I thought another country would provde a significatly better lifestyle and I don't think that would be that easy to find. I guess I could reconsider when I am comfortably ready to retire.