-
Posts
7,924 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by MichiganCardinal
-
This is what the PAC 12 has done ever since the CFP became a thing. Teams by conference to make the CFP (counting the presumed four this year): SEC: 11 (Alabama x7, Georgia x3, LSU) B1G: 8 (Ohio State x5, Michigan State, Michigan x2) ACC: 7 (Clemson x6, Florida State) Big 12: 5 (Oklahoma x4, TCU) Other: 3 (Notre Dame x2, Cincinnati) PAC 12: 2 (Oregon, Washington)
-
Williams is hurt and looks pretty bad.
-
Is the PAC-12 about to do what the PAC-12 does best and find a way out of making the playoff?
-
Beating Ohio State twice in one season, the second time to win a National Championship, would be the greatest Michigan season of all time, probably for all time. I'm not a gambling man though. Losing to Ohio State in a National Championship would be a massive let down. I'm okay playing TCU and then Georgia or USC if it wins a National Championship.
-
They merged with Chevron in the early 2000s. Lots of "76" in the west and south... It's all branding nowadays, everything is owned by someone. Hell, 7/11 just recently bought out Speedway.
-
Really poor tackling by Utah on that long run.
-
I'm so tired of hearing the adage "it's hard to beat the same team twice"... I've heard it all week about UM/OSU and then all day about Utah/USC. It's not supported by fact. In the category of stats no one asked for, here are the records in rematches for the teams that won the regular season matchup... ACC Championship: 2-3 Big 12 Championship: 6-5 B1G Championship: 1-0 PAC12 Championship: 5-1 SEC Championship: 5-2 Playoff/Championship: 0-2 That's a total of 19-13 (59%) in favor of the team that won the first game. If anything, it's fair to say that championship games are generally tough to predict because they're played by two very good teams. Good teams are hard to beat once and hard to beat twice, I think it doesn't get substantially harder the second time around. I still think USC will win this game, because I think they're the better team. I just hate that saying.
-
I think it may have been in Michigan’s interests to have suspended Mazi for the Indiana game. “Violation of Team Rules”. I don’t think not doing so is hypocritical. The tunnel incident and subsequent reaction is simply not comparable to the Mazi incident and subsequent reaction.
-
Is this contractual? I have to imagine plenty of the NY6 games would be drooling over the proposition of getting USC. I would think even if USC loses and Utah does go to the Rose Bowl, the Cotton Bowl would take USC in a heartbeat as their at large team.
-
Damn. Sucks for the team, but sucks even more for him. He was on his way to being a day two pick. RBs coming off a knee injury plummet. He may consider returning to Michigan for his senior year if he thinks he can replicate his numbers from this year and put himself back up the draft board.
-
2022 Detroit Lions Regular Season Thread
MichiganCardinal replied to 1984Echoes's topic in Detroit Lions
-
Both VA and MI require a CCW permit holder to be 21. He’s only 21 and 5 months old.
-
Not included off mic: "... now how bout them Boilermakers!?"
-
I think if there was actually a coverup, it would have been extended another six weeks. As impatient as I was at times with the tunnel incident (not to go back on my earlier criticism of the comparison), most police departments take quite a bit of time to investigate (especially when there is not an initial arrest), and most prosecutors offices take quite a bit of time to file charges. I have seen cases sit in a prosecutors office for 8 or more months before someone sees it sitting on a desk, reads the case, and files charges. It’s not right but it’s the state of the criminal justice system. Two months is really not that bad for a typical investigation.
-
I’d like to see the police report, or at least gain more details of what happened, before there is a rush to judgment. Comparing this to the tunnel incident is apples and oranges, at least right now. There were immediately cameras galore for that posted wall to wall nationally. All we have right now for this is a charge. Charges are contestable in court. I want to know what happened.
-
Hope Jim can get a nice reunion with USC.
-
I think if Poles called Holmes with that offer, Holmes should offer him Jarrad Davis in exchange for never calling us again.
-
If he will stay here as the 3rd down and goal line back (at that price point), I'm all for re-signing him. I just think there will be a team out there that sees him as their RB1 next year, and be willing to pay him as such.
-
I can definitely recall a general consensus here that Michigan was deserving of the #1 seed, but that the CFPC wouldn't want an immediate rematch. It may have been through maize colored goggles though. Obviously in hindsight Michigan was not the #1 team in the nation.
-
I think if they can justify it, they will. I think such a situation might force their hand. We saw this in a way last year, where they had Alabama jump Michigan from 3 to 1 after the SEC Championship, to avoid an immediate Georgia/Alabama rematch. Was that really the right thing to do, with Michigan having just thumped Ohio State and Iowa? Probably not, but it was justifiable, so they ran with it. I’m not sure how they could justify TCU not dropping after a loss, or Michigan jumping Georgia after wins by both.
-
If USC and TCU lose while Michigan and Georgia win, does Ohio State slide back to #3 for an instant rematch? Or does the Committee avoid it by keeping TCU at #3 despite their loss?
-
A 12-team playoff as of today... Byes: (1) Georgia*, (2) Michigan*, (3) TCU*, (4) USC* (5) Ohio State v. (12) Tulane* at Ohio Stadium (6) Alabama v. (11) Utah at Bryant-Denny (7) Tennessee v. (10) Kansas State at Neyland (8) Penn State v. (9) Clemson* in Happy Valley This definitely opens the door for more interesting conference championships, where Kansas State and Utah would be playing for a spot in the playoff instead of just an NY6 Bowl... A bye with a win and a wildcard with a close loss? It will be interesting to see what the Committee does with a Kansas State or Utah who at #10 or #11 loses their conference championship... Do you drop them for winning their division/coming in 2nd and having to play another game? That would open the door to schools like 10-2 Washington and 9-3 Florida State, who weren't invited to their conference championship. Not that I think it would have happened, but damn would it have been sweet to see Tulane come into Columbus and hand them back-to-back home losses??