MichiganCardinal

Especially when you can’t print the Seahawks’ injury report on one page

That's just it. With Hendrickson, I don't see how they re-sign and/or effectively replace the group of Hutchinson, Alim, Jamo, Barnes, Levi, Zeitler, and Iffy. And that's just those expiring (or sure to be extended in Hutch's case) after this season. Next year, add in Anzalone, Montgomery, Reader, Raymond, Paschal, and Kerby. I think Alim would have to leave for sure, and at that point, the center of your defensive line suddenly looks much worse while the edges look better, and you're counting on guys like Martin and Wingo to step up. Your trade options - at least for a big name like we are talking about - have to be either a three-month rental, who leaves and whose salary gets replaced by Hutchinson's extension, or a player who is already under a reasonable contract, who would allow you to maneuver the above deals you make to push money to after they are gone. Adding someone like Hendrickson or Reddick is virtually guaranteed to make you weaker elsewhere (and, hey, maybe you're okay with that, which I get looking at their stats).

Dan told Frank he can tend the rabbits this week

Probably just that he’s in competition. They can elevate someone from the practice squad three times before they have to make a decision on him. That’s six weeks of competition between Patrick and Robinson, or nine between Patrick, Robinson, and DPJ.

Actually not as bad as I was expecting. Alim being limited and not out is a big surprise.

Point Tater

If the price was right, sure, but I think his contract and attitude (at least how it’s portrayed) distinguish him and make him less likely to be of interest to the Lions. He never seems to be satisfied with his contract. He complained about his deal (4/60), got a raise (1/21), and then less than a year later threatened retirement and requested a trade if he didn’t get an extension. Wherever he goes, he’s not going to want to play 2025 on a lame duck deal, instead wanting a big money extension at the age of 30, and I don’t think Holmes will be prepared to give him one at the expense of guys like Alim, Barnes, Jamo, and even Levi. Which effectively makes him a rental. That Cincinnati will probably want a 1st for, if they even answer the phone. As opposed to Crosby, who you’d have through at least 2025 (he’s signed through 2026), and who’s younger, better, and brings no drama. At roughly the same price, and who I wouldn’t be as upset about losing a guy like Alim in order to keep on an extension. I wouldn’t be upset if we somehow got Hendrickson, but I would be pretty surprised.

Be respectful. Throw in James Houston.

Is there room on the bandwagon? Asking for a friend.........

That's exactly it. We are where we are because the NCAA was forced to do something. In court. So they just said "okay, inmates can run the asylum!" ushering in this whole wild west era. The solution will not lie in the NCAA. It will lie in something new, eventually.

Maxx Crosby is probably the only one who I’d approve going out and getting. He’s a game wrecker, perfect mindset for the locker room, is from the area, and combined with Hutch would lead to teams needing jumbo package offensive lines just to get passes off. He’s worth two 1sts and maybe then some. He’s also already signed through 2026, which would work with when all the contract extensions they’ve already signed get into the massive money. But it’s a pipe dream. The Raiders are terrible but won’t admit it so he’s stuck.

Those stats come out every year (more often about teams starting 0-2 or 1-2) and I don’t put much stock in them. Of course starting 0-3 is bad. But what matters more is that you have the talent to right the ship, and the Bengals are talented. Not to mention they are all in on winning now and have demonstrated a lack of interest in trading talent. They’ve pissed off half their receivers room in addition to Hendrickson, and are likely far from throwing in the towel on this season. If they give up now, they’re also giving up on Zac Taylor, Duke Tobin, Tee Higgins, and JaMarr Chase and are likely rebuilding their entire team over the course of multiple years while saddled with a (very good) QB (but) whose APY is $55 million. 95% of teams that start 0-3 suck. That’s why the stats are so grim. The Titans suck. The Jaguars probably suck. I don’t think the Bengals suck. They should have beaten the Chiefs a week ago. Our own 2021 squad shows that you can recover from worse than 0-3. If they’re 2-7 or 1-8 at the trade deadline, then sure that might change and they’ll probably offload some talent that they won’t be able to re-sign. But they wouldn’t even entertain a conversation right now, or at 0-4.

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Assistant Coach probably conditioned $100k on him being a success. UNLV can pay that in NIL to a starting QB, but only when they really need to. Probably not on any given grad transfer. Kid then had early success. Meanwhile, an SEC school like Ole Miss quietly offers him $500k to redshirt and transfer. Now kid says “I never got my $100k.” Nonsense like this will keep happening until the money-makers in the room (B1G and SEC) leave the NCAA and regulate themselves. And even then it might still happen to schools like UNLV, unless the powers that be don’t want it happening to UNLV out of their own self interests.

I don't think it's dirty. Davenport is trying to muscle Paris Johnson backwards to collapse the pocket. Johnson tries to break the arm (not literally) and for whatever reason, Davenport's elbow snaps before his grip/wrist does. Normally that move should just result in Davenport going face first into the turf, or if he's good, maintaining his balance and re-establishing his charge. Just a freak play. That tends to happen more to injury-prone players like Davenport.

I’m just saying I think the Lions are the better team. I also think water tends to find its level around this time and through the next few weeks. Weird stuff happens in the first few weeks, that we all look back on in week 15 and say “how did they beat them?!” Because teams like Cincinnati will go on a run and win 8 of their next 10, while teams like Washington will lose eight in a row. Not claiming either of those will happen, but they tend to. It’s a week to week league to some extent, but the better team should still win more often than not. There will never be a year with 16 teams at 9-8 and the other 16 at 8-9. Though that would be fun.

Call me crazy but I don’t think the sea chickens are very good. They’re 3-0, but have beat Bo Nix and the Broncos by 6, Jacoby Brissett and the Patriots by 3 in OT, and Skylar Thompson and our old friend Tim Boyle, where Miami only scored 3 points. The Lions are the best offense and best defense they’ll have seen yet. We should win.

You're both right. Holmes hits far more than he whiffs and I'm not about to complain about the overall job that he's done, but damn would it be nice to have some consistent production at the edge across from Hutch. Maybe it's all chess and he's trying to drive down the price of Hutch's extension. "Well, Mr. Agent, I would pay him $175 million over five years, but I read a certain message board and was told that pressures are not as effective as sacks!"

This is exactly their problem with him. It’s using a roster spot on a guy who they don’t trust on running plays and who is below replacement on special teams. So he’s only useful on 100% passing downs (i.e., 3/long and 4/medium, depending on the opponent). That is only about 1-5 snaps a game. He saw three snaps against Tampa for instance, the lowest snap count of anybody on the entire team when you include special teams contributions. If you have the roster spot to spare, sure, it doesn’t hurt, particularly if he’s as effective on those 1-5 snaps as he was last season. Which is why we might see him active against Seattle with spots opening up for Barnes and Davenport.

Eight. It becomes 10 if you make the postseason. The Lions have used three I believe: Emmanuel Moseley and Brodric Martin were on IR/DTR to start the season, then John Cominsky was put on it shortly after.

I’m also hoping we get Iffy back this week. If we don’t it means the injury has lingered longer than expected when they set the roster, because he could have been placed on IR if he was always going to miss at least four games.

Yes, but I don’t accept it as an excuse in year four. Next man up. We lost CJGJ and Houston for the season last year in week two and didn’t let it stop it from accomplishing our goals. Davenport was expected. No one was holding their breath that he was about to get through an entire season. Barnes hurts, but he’s an off-ball linebacker. I think they’ll slide Jack Campbell to Will and put Rodrigo at Sam. They’ve still got JRM behind them, and a host of depth that primarily plays special teams. Ragnow will hurt if he’s out for an extended period of time. We will see if they place him on IR, or if he’s actually week to week. It’s incredible that he posted the highest PFF score on the team while playing through that, and I wouldn’t put it past him to be back after the bye. Everyone else it sounds like is day to day. I expect a gruesome injury report tomorrow, but they can still beat this Seahawks team.

Back to Hutch getting double teamed every down with a rotating cast of clowns like Romeo Okwara and Charles Harris opposite him. Holmes might bring someone in to replace Davenport, but it won’t be Reddick. Doesn’t for the locker room or the scheme, and we won’t want to pay him long-term. Azeez Ojulari might fit the bill.

It's all just so subjective. The Personal Conduct Policy effectively puts Goodell in the shoes of judge, jury, and executioner, where he is expected to compare apples and oranges to assign game suspensions. Except instead of apples and oranges, it's comparing domestic violence and aggravated assault/collision causing injury amongst a bunch of millionaires who pretty much all have CTE. So instead of "fair" and "just" punishments being levied out - which is almost impossible to imagine anyway, it shouldn't be the job of the parent organization NFL to police their club's employees conduct when they're not at their job - it all comes down to making NFL owners seem like a group of people that gives a **** about anything other than lining their pockets. Spoiler alert, they don't. And so naturally, high publicity things like a video of Ray Rice knocking out his fiancée, or Deshaun Watson getting sued for dozens of sexual assault allegations, those get punished harshly. And when it's a smaller profile thing, like Rice driving away from the scene of an accident, it's swept under the rug. I've advocated before for abolishing the Personal Conduct Policy. Let individual teams devise manners to punish their individual players for off-the-field conduct. It will result in less suspensions, of course. The Steelers aren't suspending Cam Sutton eight games if they have their way. But let them answer for that. Some organizations will care more about doing right by the community, just like is already the case. And those that don't will be justifiably trashed in the public eye. But if I work for an employer, it's my employer who will decide whether to fire me if I get a DWI. Not a larger conglomerate organization that my employer works within.