pfife

Born to Run is so good!!! For me it's Radiohead. I'm really over them.

C-Span callers are one of my windows into how people with different political views think.... and sometimes it's wild..... Over the last couple days I've heard these both quite a bit: 1) There's no one on the Jan 6 committee defending Trump so it's biased. 2) Why was Ray Epps not brought in? Facts: 1) Trump was literally subpoenaed by the committee and refused , as did many people who could also defend Trump. Not to mention that Kevin McCarthy tanked a version of the committee that would have had 50/50 representation across parties. 2) Ray Epps was brought in. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-committee-dismisses-ray-epps-conspiracy-theory-issues-new-n1287335

MSNBC's roundup tonight of the hearings today isn't as hard core as it normally is, so I'm going to read that report that dropped today. Anyone read any of it yet?

I really do think they want to subvert it. I also think they want to subvert good governance, in general.

they were protecting our rights

In some ways I feel like that could be the unintended consequences of building a huge right wing media bubble and living solely in it. They literally think people like their shit ass policies

It seems like his electability could be determined by a couple different things that aren't reflective of his behavior, thinking about his opponent and if there's a 3rd party spoiler for the Dems

Good tats anyway.

Yessir. It's my understanding as well. Might be the only one that's always 50/50. I bet the GOP stacks it with people with ethics issues.... as if they have members that dont.

I love conservatives declaring why the left does something. I know if I want to know the lefts intentions I'm going to a conservative writer.

Sorry it was Biden's camp pain, not admin.

Pretty incorrect. The complaint by the Biden administration, released by Taibbi in twitter files #1 contained 4 specific links to tweets. The wayback machine was used and all 4 were hunters dong. That's not a "talking point", that's what happened. Furthermore, the idea of hunters laptop wasn't banned. A specific article by Nypost was banned. This also is what happened.

Lol at Olbermann counting down his top 3 suspensions in his career 🤣 😆 😂

If tiktok was included he'd have to ban the most odious account on the site and he likes that account

amazing that was several jobs ago lol

damn I just got a new job and now you have me rethinking my career choice

Rockin' Robert Seger was trending on twitter which really freaked me out for a second....... but he's still alive. So obviously.... we're gonna throw on some Hollywood Nights and also the Fire Inside which are 2 of my absolute favorite tunes ever.

that woudl be wild

Chris Hayes just said Ron Desantis, who many call "short trump" and I'm pretty much always going to call him that

So good.

You weren't that generous back then but it was justifiable.

I'd love to get a dark brandon nft on my obama phone

I don't really think it's a crisis.... I love me some twitter but I'm warming up on Post and/or Mastodon these days so capitalism

This is such a weak take. Not that logic actually matters but there's a diference between a crisis and a constitutional crisis. They considered it a constitutional crisis, to the point where the leader of their party was advocating terminating pertinent aspects of the constitution to install himself president over it. We consider it a crisis because we like twitter and don't want it to suck ballz Another reason it's a weak take is that you can easily just switcheroo it: "Conservatives got banned/suppressed/censored and it was a crisis. Libs and journalists get banned and it's not a crisis".