This is such a weak take. Not that logic actually matters but there's a diference between a crisis and a constitutional crisis. They considered it a constitutional crisis, to the point where the leader of their party was advocating terminating pertinent aspects of the constitution to install himself president over it.
We consider it a crisis because we like twitter and don't want it to suck ballz
Another reason it's a weak take is that you can easily just switcheroo it:
"Conservatives got banned/suppressed/censored and it was a crisis. Libs and journalists get banned and it's not a crisis".