pfife

If the Hill is to be believed.... https://thehill.com/news/house/3517650-mccarthy-wants-to-tap-mcconnell-about-jan-6-security-failures/

Failed HC Jack Del Rio fined 100,000 for his comments about Jan 6th

He's running a counter-investigation apparently, and they're going to include investingating Cocaine Mitch b/c of the police staffing/security of the capitol. I'll get the popcorn

I'm very childish so I love twitter parody accounts.... this one is top notch

step back a tad, that's the kind of conservatives I miss around here, and it's related to that Volts tweet I posted. You guys (Oblong, you, OMF, Shabba, etc) would make arguments. Now it's just like Volts said, it's just flood the zone malarkey. That said Oblong was super trolly back in the day unlike me

if it makes you feel any better you were really good at arguing that really bad stuff haha

it does feel like we're good at computers around here for some reason prolly all the pfas

Good stuff, but I think the disconnect is you're asking him questions under the assumption he's posting in good faith. He's not. He posts crap like that but says he's not a Trump supporter.

lol ok chief.

1 is even too many

I agree with you - I think we have experience with what happens when lawless president isn't held accountable. But if the lawless president is held accountable..... I'm not saying this b/c I think he shouldn't be held accountable but I think there could be a lot of violence if that happens and so you can't fuck around and find out with it

I'm not sure whether they're doing somethign or not. I agree w/ Oblong that they wouldn't say much about it. I also think that it seems like it really could take a long time. If they're going to indict Trump over something that case needs to be really really tight and those things always take way longer than lay people think it should.

They seemed off to a pretty good start at presenting that case yesterday.

I think your posts while I disagree are good. Thank you for posting. I think the the metaphor you made about parenting was good but I'm just not sure how we can apply that to items the bible says people should be killed over. For a non-christian such as myself (although a confirmed Lutheran), the link is a little thick to reason through. Is this paragraph from your link saying, essentially, we are not bound by old testament b/c of the new testament?

I was in HS a long time ago but the only thing we had along these lines was our government teacher ran some sessions before school that he billed as "how to become a millionaire" by doing gradual consistent saving. It wasn't really new to me b/c that's what my dad always preached.

Yep. YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO

lol and apparently for quite a while since she had long since checked out lol

lol whadda bish

So when the Bible says to stone homosexuals, is that an effort to make the dead person less gay?

really? That's the only way? it says to love thy neighbor and also to stone thy neighbor if he has sex with a dude pretty clear contradiction

Seems like the fash are coalescing around a narrative of Pelosi didn't stop us good enough which of course is trash. The senate was breached and she doesn't control the senate

He had a quote sometime before that where he kinda said democracy wasn't important..... he's an admitted and total fash

Got it hahahaha