pfife

And also nice literally saying multiple times that a policy change didn't cause it, then literally blaming a Biden policy change for it. troll much?

Lol except it didn't. Nice making it up as you go

You argue white people can't get the vaccine so your grasp of simple facts is not trustworthy.

But not the lies. Imagine saying white ppl can't get vaccinated. Then imagine choosing to log into this website, drop really dated insults that are so bad they're self burns, and also defending a lie that white people can't get vaxxed.

Lol at your boomer nickname for me. Couldn't come up with a reference under 60 years old chief? Oh and why not address what I say instead of what I don't say as I've never said that It's hilarious how scared of my posts you are

White people can get vaxed. He obviously lied and you choose to defend it.

All tax breaks are not subject to filibuster because they're budget items and this are applicable for reconciliation. Pretty convenient for the GOP huh? Screw the filibuster

In all of that did you admit you were wrong? I'm really lacking motivation to read all of that when I outright know you messed up the most rudimentary math

Chief: Your article said this Pfizer-BioNTech: 100 million doses (two-dose regimen) Moderna: 100 million doses (two-dose regimen) Johnson & Johnson: 100 million doses (one-dose regimen) Then you said this: Wrong. Literally what you posted would be 200 million people. Biden has vaccinated over 200 million people. unreal chief. You should at least have the basic math right before you flex.

check your math

literally didn't buy enough actual approved doses to vaccinate more than biden has, and actually turned down enoguh to do so - and you're arguing the exact oppposite would have happened if he was president in you fake world. SMH. Its simple numbers chief, even your numbers. Use them right.

if the gop wants the filibuster so bad they can just reinstall it when they're in the majority. It only takes 51 votes.

you're confusing "democracy" with "what I want"

Per usual... you didn't read your article far enough. It says this: An important point to remember, though, is that these contract numbers don’t necessarily represent deliverable vaccines. The contracts represent early promises. There were still important hurdles to be cleared before these possible vaccine candidates could be a reality

Lol at counting ones not approved. Just more not reality

I don't pay attention to your hypotheticals. You say something like "people would be more vaccinated if trump was president" and I start throwing real life facts at it in order to demonstrate out honest ridiculous it is. The details of your hypothetical are irrelevant to me. I don't even read them. You didn't post how many doses he had before he turned down the 100m. The article I posted said they had secured 100m Moderna before that. So he had enough for 50m to get vaccinated. Unless you want to find something more, like an actual number, that's pretty much the top limit you got if you wanna use actual facts and what happened to inform your fake world takes about how many trump woulda vaccinated. After that it becomes just you fictionalizing which is super boring

again no one silenced them. they are still more than able to bump their gums in front of cameras.

I miss conservatives here that weren't complete hacks. It's been a long time since we had even one. Oblong can you go back to being conservative? paging shabba like if we had at least one that thought "wow my argument is really bad" before hitting send that would be super awesome.

My understanding from a few months back was the exact opposite: AT&T basically birthed and raised OAN: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-oneamerica-att/

Also it's quite obvious the democrats DON'T support ending the fillibuster. They clearly and obviously don't have the votes to do it, which obviously means they don't support ending it. So not only are you a troll hack, you're a straight up liar too. That's not even addressing your implicit notion that a legislative device that allows a minority to stop anything is "democracy" which is obviously false on its face. Furthermore, ending it via the legislature voting on it would actually be democracy hoss. It would be democracy you don't like which you like to cancel. Because you're a hypocrite and like to cancel things you don't like, and cry about things getting cancelled you do like.

weirdly you have no words for Mitch ending the fillibuster. Because you're a troll hack.

Minus that whole armed insurrection thing though, right hoss? hilarious

Literally no one silenced OAN. They can still keep talking their garbage all they want.

work of fiction

nice fence in your crotch