pfife
-
Posts
7,179 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
33
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by pfife
-
When your argument assumes Boeing management makes good decisions........ as jim price would say thats a double wow
-
Its prolly a sign of a well led life that you didnt get it LOL
-
Uh huh
-
Its a deep cut burn on the forum troll. They said michigan sure knew how to pick em....about Amy Klobuchar lol
-
Mike Rounds? Indiana sure knows how to pick em
-
CBS hires and protects pedos.
-
Why not let the interview air? They said before no one watches him so what does it matter
-
Trending..... on x maybe
-
Its so emblematic of all the **** thats ****ed now
-
Speaking of pedo protectors hi cbs yall sick ****s
-
I think the sane side does themselves a disservice by adhering to old unwritten rules that the insane side just ignores. The not criticizing the successor is one of them. Obama does the same thing.
-
As you once infamously said... Its 2024
-
Deporting people you dont like apparently isnt just limited to MAGA.
-
Not the own you think it is
-
What an incredibly hilarious self own
-
Socialism bails you out yet again.
-
That former obama lawyer deserves to get fired and also she can go to hell and also **** off See its easy to not support pedos and pedo protectors but the struggle is real for some
-
Piker was also talking about Newsome vs JV Dance in 2028 but every post since acted like it was Newsome vs Trump, or at least glossed over any difference JVDance instead of trump would make in the voting calculus.
-
Fwiw it was pretty clear that i was going out of my way not to talk about a specific politician but the conversation started because hasan piker was talking about gavin newsome in 2028 none of which is related to biden. I 100% do think Neswome supports policies that could be harmful to someone in my family.
-
No
-
I see what you're saying thanks for pointing that out.
-
Jeez that 'since 2003' wpuld include the great recession. Thats spectacularly bad.
-
This seems fair to me. I just think one persons 'marginally better' could easily be another persons major issue. Theres also the issue of the whole perception of a candidate and what they support being super subjective and the result of a cacophony of propaganda
-
If i voted for spouse killing policy candidate and then the spouse killing policy kills my spouse, would you guys defend me from the inevitable leapords eat faces burns?
-
Appreciate this response. Does the politician in this scenario have any responsibility to support policies more amenable to a person not ready to vote for them because of those policies?
