gehringer_2

If you are going to play yourself out of 1/1, might as well be a year when it's not going to cost you a consensus 1/1 QB.

It would take a minor miracle for W Castro to make the team out of ST.

UM students apparently passing around a petition to move the start of classes back two weeks. Not likely happening.

I haven't looked at the schedule but they usually leave a lot of off days for the 1st couple of weeks, so Hill probably makes the team out of ST, then someone gets cut once they need to add a pitcher.

until the windmill builders are ready to donate more to his campaigns than the dying mining co's anyway. Who knows, that day may not be that far off.

Manchin is already too late to anything for the coal industry. Since 2010 38% of WVa mines have closed and production is down 53%. He'd be doing his constituents a lot more good trying to pass BBB and send some of those dollars to his state. Coal is not coming back.

Maybe Manchin figures if the gets enough progs to say bad things about him it will make a party switch before 2024 easier.

Charlie Batch's last stand. 0-9 as a starter than season.

I suppose the rationale is that if the vaccinated carry Omicron asymptomatically and still shed it, they will infect the unvaccinated and they will get sick and the hospitals don't have room for more?

The pylon is on the chalk line, so it is out of bounds, but on the other hand the vertical plane above the sideline has never mattered. As long as your feet got down it doesn't matter how much of your body or the ball is across the sideline plane. So if they changed the rule about contacting the pylon that sounds a good correction.

I'd chalk this one up to the fact that the Lions O Line moved some people but mostly that Murray missed a ton of open throws. But hey, you are supposed to win if the other guy has a bad day.

The catch rule over-ruled the ball in the end zone rule there. It wasn't a catch so it couldn't be a TD regardless of whether the ball was in the end zone.

That is the real brilliance of BOR, that with the singular exception of the 2A, the statements are all conceptual instead of concrete, which has allowed the document to remain relevant despite the evolution of society into something beyond the imagination of bunch 18th anti-monarchists. The real problem is in the 1st two articles and the history of state additions, which has created a structure that has become non-democratic.

Damn! 66 Impala SS in blue was my first car. Not the rag top - but other wise identical.

you know, I saw the Dr Strange film last night, but until now I have been assuming I did end up back in the dimension I started......

long post alert: I would quibble with one of your previous posts. I don't think it's hard at all to argue a general right of privacy as the clear implication of the 4th amendment - the logic is certainly as direct as any argument that the 2nd amendment supports personal self-defense arms. That said, I agree drawing the line from a generalized right to privacy to a specific right to abortion is more uncertain, which even Roe recognizes with its gestation based regime limitations on the privacy right. So to your question "would I be fine" the answer would be that I would recognize the soundness of legal doctrine that more clearly separated the two but I would still rather leave the responsibility for the unborn with mothers and not the state. Plus as a practical matter, pharmaceutical abortion has made any ban on early stage abortion impossible to enforce and bans on later stage abortion have already proven to produce tragic social results. It's bad practical social policy regardless of the legal framework. It goes back the problem that we really don't have any idea what life, sentience, or consciousness are even in the adult human form, let alone the developing one. The 'viability' criteria was a convenient kludge in an earlier era, but is obsoleted in an era when we can clone mammals. Each side wants to wrap itself in a convenient absolutism (it's a life! it's a lump of tissue!) when neither can even state what a human being is with respect to themselves. Ask anyone who has seen dementia slowly turn a person that had every aspect of identity and personhood you see in yourself back into a mass of dumb tissue. There is an irrefutable point where the 'person' is simply gone, despite a fully formed and functional (including heart beat) physical body still existing in space. What happened to the person? Was that consciousness just a self-delusion created from complex but fully determinate processes? If it was 'real' what was its nature and does whatever it was still exist somewhere? Can you determine some magic crossover point between such a human existence and the dumb biological process that is all that is left in the end? We get no marker on that long downward slide, neither do we get one on the upward one. We don't get to see a ghostly spectral soul separating from the body and waving goodbye to resolve our uncertainties. In Indian philosophy there is a recognition of the difficulty in finding the actual "I" behind consciousness. In the West we pretty much ignore the issue and instead argue from the error of our chosen absolutes.

So if they cut back to half capacity how do they decide whose pre-purchased tickets get honored? Cancel them all and require repurchase or do some kind of lottery? Or only even numbers rows or seats. etc?

He has single-handedly brought the Wings power play back form dead. I wonder what Scotty wound have done with Seider. In general he wasn't big on rookie Dmen!

In the Yzerplan we trust.

it seemed to be like a combination of arguing the perfect as the enemy of the good and "well its not really serious anyway"

the point was that it is another case of a high ranking judge with no seeming attachment to rational thinking. Male or female I find it frightening. Specialization is an inevitable consequence in a complex society, but the increasing intellectual isolation of the judiciary has much broader implications than that of say engineers or doctors. I would imagine that if M Larson had ever had an experience in an OSHA regulated environment that context would have made HER less prone to such a logical non-sequitor and one that betrays such a fundamental misunderstanding of what she is ruling on.

One would normally expect that the rational place for that point to be would be some time beyond where more than a thousand are sill dying everyday in the US and Canada. Then again, the backlash against anti-vaxxers may grow to where maybe that won't be the case.

yeah - Barrett sure seemed ready to channel her inner Handmaiden. There will be no burdens too undue.

politicians court people who make contributions. The young in general have low levels of discretionary funds. When money = speech, then it's really money = votes and the idea of a 'one man, one vote' democracy gets replaced by a 'one dollar, one vote' one. This is a failed government and it has passed the tipping point of ever being able to reform itself back into a functioning representative democracy.

It will be 5-4, they will loose Roberts but other 5 will uphold Mississippi. So, how is the vision plan at Brandeis?