If the bar is "reaching their potential", that's almost nobody, because almost nobody self-actualizes at 100% of their potential. If the bar is instead for all four of them to be positive contributors, then I think it's reasonable for Harris to plan for them to be so. Otherwise, if we enter into gaming out which two of them will be good and which two will crap out, then we have to guess which two of them will crap out so we can trade them for rentals, and it might well be the wrong two we send away, and then we just become Dave Dombrowski 2.0. Speaking only for myself, I wouldn't want that. I like the direction Harris is going in, as is, just fine.
I get the urge to throw it all onto the table to go for it now, this year, because 7 1/2 games in first place on August 16 might never happen again as long as we live. I get that—I'm the same age as you. But speaking only for myself, I am confident enough in Harris's approach that even without trading away the top of our system for the shiniest rental pieces available, we are still going to be competitive for a ring in my remaining lifetime. And if we're not, then when you're on your deathbed, you can blame it all on me. 😁