buddha Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 12 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said: And you don't just toss them to the curb searching for a 2nd pairing D'man. IMO. would you have included cossa in a hughes trade? what about rasmus andersson? Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, buddha said: would you have included cossa in a hughes trade? what about rasmus andersson? It's a tricky call on a guy who's going to be a FA in the summer anyway. I'd love to see more leagues copy the NBA with a 'sign and trade' system. Edited 13 hours ago by gehringer_2 Quote
1984Echoes Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago No. Goalie first, fill in the blanks afterwards. Dude... you've been trying to trade Cossa from the moment we drafted him. This is not new. I mean from your perspective. Although I don't think I've changed on this stance either... I've always wanted to establish a dominant goalie as #1 priority; although I still want the "complete" team... just not at the expense of a potential dominant goalie. So, same answer as always, if Cossa is included... no to Rasmus and no to Hughes. Besides, wouldn't they make ASP redundant? He would be the first guy to consider being included in a trade of that nature... And no goalies until we know which one can dominate in the NHL. THEN I would consider a trade of the "extra" goalie or "blocked by our dominant #1 goalie" guys... IMO. Quote
buddha Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 30 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said: No. Goalie first, fill in the blanks afterwards. Dude... you've been trying to trade Cossa from the moment we drafted him. This is not new. I mean from your perspective. Although I don't think I've changed on this stance either... I've always wanted to establish a dominant goalie as #1 priority; although I still want the "complete" team... just not at the expense of a potential dominant goalie. So, same answer as always, if Cossa is included... no to Rasmus and no to Hughes. Besides, wouldn't they make ASP redundant? He would be the first guy to consider being included in a trade of that nature... And no goalies until we know which one can dominate in the NHL. THEN I would consider a trade of the "extra" goalie or "blocked by our dominant #1 goalie" guys... IMO. you wouldnt trade cossa for quinn hughes? youre drunk. its always good to have as many great players as possible, including goalie if you can. but you do not need a great goalie to win a stanley cup. ask chris osgood. or igor shesterkin. or connor hellebuyck. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.