Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, oblong said:

The ****ing run on contact play has been a thing since Lamont. Why?  I’ve never seen it work and other teams don’t do it as often.

I'm fairly certain Dickerson was talking about it earlier this season, and he seemed to be saying that it was actually a net positive for the Tigers. I don't remember how he said that was measured.

just for whatever it's worth (which may be very little).

Edited by Crazy Cat Gentleman
Posted
5 minutes ago, Crazy Cat Gentleman said:

I'm fairly certain Dickerson was talking about it earlier this season, and he seemed to be saying that it was actually a net positive for the Tigers. I don't remember how he said that was measured.

just for whatever it's worth (which may be very little).

I do recall him saying that. I don’t believe it. But I’m also not a know it all. If I am wrong so be it. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, oblong said:

I do recall him saying that. I don’t believe it. But I’m also not a know it all. If I am wrong so be it. 

I looked it up and supposedly it is a net positive not by a lot from what I can tell, but it is a positive. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Crazy Cat Gentleman said:

I'm fairly certain Dickerson was talking about it earlier this season, and he seemed to be saying that it was actually a net positive for the Tigers. I don't remember how he said that was measured.

just for whatever it's worth (which may be very little).

Yes because it could have been one run with two outs and nobody on base. Instead it was one out with runners on first and second. A three run homer would be very bad in that case. Tigers still managed to score a run.

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, oblong said:

The ****ing run on contact play has been a thing since Lamont. Why?  I’ve never seen it work and other teams don’t do it as often.

If you have base runners that can really stretch their lead down the 3b line  - without getting picked off a la Wenceel, then they have so little distance to go it's a tough out to make, but the Tigers don't really have that many base runners like that. It's also much better with a LH batter when the 3b is playing well off the line so the runner at 3rd can take that big lead. If you have Gleyber on 3rd and Tork at the plate? Fuggedabadit.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
35 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

Did A. J. Pierzynski ever get into a big fight with the Tigers? 

It wasn’t a fight but I remember Craig Monroe hit a big home run, maybe a grand slam, and when he got to the plate to celebrate with the others AJ stood right behind was the plate after Craig touched the home.  The players were hugging and stuff and someone bumped into AJ and got mad. AJ being AJ he was a jerk to the point of still having plausible deniability.  “What?  I am just standing here where the catcher stands…” 

I aways liked him. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      309
    • Most Online
      704

    Newest Member
    wurmie
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...