gehringer_2 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: Let's say you take positional adjustment out if altogether and make WAR = OWAR + DRS. That would be a stat which is totally based on what they do on the field. I like that. For me it just goes back the idea that I find it nonsensical for an above average defender at any position to be considered as having cost his team runs/wins. That part is only a matter of the semantics of what the unit is called. If you are going to call it Wins above replacement, than no above average D player at any position should be rated as costing his team wins, because they didn't in any reasonable sense. He may not field like a SS, but his contribution was not negative. So if you call it something else that goes away. 😉 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: I like that. For me it just goes back the idea that I find it nonsensical for an above average defender at any position to be considered as having cost his team runs/wins. That part is only a matter of the semantics of what the unit is called. If you are going to call it Wins above replacement, than no above average D player at any position should be rated as costing his team wins, because they didn't in any reasonable sense. He may not field like a SS, but his contribution was not negative. So if you call it something else that goes away. 😉 I would have been happy to just keeping fielding separate from hitting and not trying boil everything down to one number. If you do want to arrive at one number for a player's value though, I do think you need to consider the position they play. If a DH goes into the Hall of Fame or wins an MVP, he should have to hit better than his peer who plays a position. Edited 12 hours ago by Tiger337 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: I would have been happy to just keeping fielding separate from hitting and not trying boil everything down to one number. If you do want to arrive at one number for a player's value though, I do think you need to consider the position they play. If a DH goes into the Hall of Fame or wins an MVP, he should have to hit better than his peer who plays a position. no arg on that. Quote
Edman85 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Did Longenhagen's roster crunch post make it in here? https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2025-american-league-40-man-roster-crunch-analysis/ Trevin Michael wasn't on my Rule 5 protection radar. Quote
4hzglory Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 43 minutes ago, Edman85 said: Did Longenhagen's roster crunch post make it in here? https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2025-american-league-40-man-roster-crunch-analysis/ Trevin Michael wasn't on my Rule 5 protection radar. Yeah, that doesn't make sense to me at all. And the fact that he places Lee, likely a top 125-50 overall prospect who is 22 and played a full season at AAA behind Cruz is crazy to me. I do think Cruz has a chance to be selected, but losing Lee for nothing would be significantly worse than losing Cruz for nothing IMO as Lee has a significantly higher offensive floor and upside than Cruz IMO. Lee could still be part of a trade, but I think he absolutely needs to be protected if he isn't traded. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago So, who wants to talk about Park Factors today?😃 Quote
Edman85 Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago 34 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: So, who wants to talk about Park Factors today?😃 I am sad I missed out on a lot of the nitty gritty talk last week. I probably won't have much nerd time until after Christmas though 😀 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.