Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

Let's say you take positional adjustment out if altogether and make WAR = OWAR + DRS.  That would be a stat which is totally based on what they do on the field.

I like that. For me it just goes back the idea that I find it nonsensical for an above average defender at any position to be considered as having cost his team runs/wins. That part is only a matter of the semantics of what the unit is called. If you are going to call it Wins above replacement, than no above average D player at any position should be rated as costing his team wins, because they didn't in any reasonable sense. He may not field like a SS, but his contribution was not negative. So if you call it something else that goes away. 😉

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

I like that. For me it just goes back the idea that I find it nonsensical for an above average defender at any position to be considered as having cost his team runs/wins. That part is only a matter of the semantics of what the unit is called. If you are going to call it Wins above replacement, than no above average D player at any position should be rated as costing his team wins, because they didn't in any reasonable sense. He may not field like a SS, but his contribution was not negative. So if you call it something else that goes away. 😉

I would have been happy to just keeping fielding separate from hitting and not trying boil everything down to one number.  If you do want to arrive at one number for a player's value though, I do think you need to consider the position they play.  If a DH goes into the Hall of Fame or wins an MVP, he should have to hit better than his peer who plays a position.  

Edited by Tiger337
Posted
44 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I would have been happy to just keeping fielding separate from hitting and not trying boil everything down to one number.  If you do want to arrive at one number for a player's value though, I do think you need to consider the position they play.  If a DH goes into the Hall of Fame or wins an MVP, he should have to hit better than his peer who plays a position.  

no arg on that.

Posted
43 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

Did Longenhagen's roster crunch post make it in here?

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2025-american-league-40-man-roster-crunch-analysis/

Trevin Michael wasn't on my Rule 5 protection radar.

Yeah, that doesn't make sense to me at all.  And the fact that he places Lee, likely a top 125-50 overall prospect who is 22 and played a full season at AAA behind Cruz is crazy to me.  I do think Cruz has a chance to be selected, but losing Lee for nothing would be significantly worse than losing Cruz for nothing IMO as Lee has a significantly higher offensive floor and upside than Cruz IMO.  Lee could still be part of a trade, but I think he absolutely needs to be protected if he isn't traded.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

So, who wants to talk about Park Factors today?😃

I am sad I missed out on a lot of the nitty gritty talk last week. I probably won't have much nerd time until after Christmas though 😀 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...