chasfh Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Quote
Tigermojo Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 28 minutes ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Harris has shown he's willing to get creative with contracts which seems really good for the future. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 4 hours ago, romad1 said: Have you been lately? Dublin in particular is one of the more expensive cities in Europe. Not Switzerland expensive but still a bit spendy. Bray. Quote
chasfh Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 2 Quote
Tenacious D Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 6 minutes ago, chasfh said: Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 Ilitch was cheap, Harris scared. Glad we can move past that narrative. 1 Quote
Sports_Freak Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 43 minutes ago, chasfh said: Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 Not his money. Chris gets 99% of the credit. It may even have been his idea? Quote
Edman85 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Flaherty and Torres got that as well. Quote
NorthWoods Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 3 hours ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? You need that to move the missus and a couple of sides. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, Edman85 said: Flaherty and Torres got that as well. I didn’t see that highlighted in either of their deals, nor had I heard of any other contracts containing this clause. How common is this? Do you think it serves as a sort of indirect no-trade clause? If not, what’s the purpose of it? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.