chasfh Posted April 15 Posted April 15 I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Quote
Tigermojo Posted April 15 Author Posted April 15 28 minutes ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Harris has shown he's willing to get creative with contracts which seems really good for the future. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted April 16 Posted April 16 4 hours ago, romad1 said: Have you been lately? Dublin in particular is one of the more expensive cities in Europe. Not Switzerland expensive but still a bit spendy. Bray. Quote
chasfh Posted April 16 Posted April 16 Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 2 Quote
Tenacious D Posted April 16 Posted April 16 6 minutes ago, chasfh said: Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 Ilitch was cheap, Harris scared. Glad we can move past that narrative. 1 Quote
Sports_Freak Posted April 16 Posted April 16 43 minutes ago, chasfh said: Remember when Harris was too cheap or too scared or too stupid or too much of a toadie to spend money on players? Ah, good times … 😁 Not his money. Chris gets 99% of the credit. It may even have been his idea? Quote
Edman85 Posted April 16 Posted April 16 2 hours ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? Flaherty and Torres got that as well. Quote
NorthWoods Posted April 16 Posted April 16 3 hours ago, chasfh said: I am fascinated by the $5 million if he gets traded clause. Doesn't that serve as a sort of de facto no trade clause? You need that to move the missus and a couple of sides. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted April 16 Posted April 16 11 hours ago, Edman85 said: Flaherty and Torres got that as well. I didn’t see that highlighted in either of their deals, nor had I heard of any other contracts containing this clause. How common is this? Do you think it serves as a sort of indirect no-trade clause? If not, what’s the purpose of it? Quote
DTroppens Posted April 17 Posted April 17 I think it's worth the gamble. The possible strike probably made this easier to make it happen. Quote
Edman85 Posted April 17 Posted April 17 20 hours ago, chasfh said: I didn’t see that highlighted in either of their deals, nor had I heard of any other contracts containing this clause. How common is this? Do you think it serves as a sort of indirect no-trade clause? If not, what’s the purpose of it? Poke around Cot's and search for assignment bonus. But yes, it does seem like something of a soft no-trade. https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/american-league/detroit-tigers/ Quote
UCFKNIGHT Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The McGonigle contract extension appears to be a good move. Keep him out of the free agent market. We small market teams don't need to help the Dodgers, Yankees, Mets and Phillies get better at our expense. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.