Jump to content

buddha

Members
  • Posts

    15,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

Everything posted by buddha

  1. neither sutton nor mosely were #1 corners. that's why they wanted witherspoon in the draft.
  2. nobody wanted lavine so he decided to have surgery. the bulls have done so much better without him. FOR A REASON! he's a cancer. a bad player. a selfish suck on the team. do. not. trade. for. lavine.
  3. jaylon johnson will not be a free agent. they will franchise him. sneed is unlikely to be either, but the chiefs have cap choices to make aince mahomes makes so much money. dont know about fuller. the usual rule is that really good players dont make it to free agency. usually, free agency is to build depth and fill holes, not to bring in difference makers.
  4. trade him for what? you'd have to retain 50% salary at a minimum. he isnt playing well, wjy would another team want him?
  5. i would argue that he's building the organization the only way you can without lottery luck: depth and youth.
  6. if they dont deal bogey for a first round pick im going to scream. he's got to warrant a first rounder with the way he's shooting.
  7. why do you want to trade kane? he's one of our best players. thryre trying to make the playoffs this year. unless they have a disastrous february like they had a disastrous december, i dont see them dealing kane or ghost. but im still holding out for our unicorn scenario where we trade them and then deal assets for stars! dare to dream! 84lives for GM! ๐Ÿ™‚
  8. me too. that's half the fun! ๐Ÿ™‚
  9. all of us with our galaxy brain ideas of trading ghost and kane and then trading FOR another star isnt going to happen. the world doesnt work like us working our trade machines on espn.
  10. theyre not trading kane.
  11. i dont know if edvinsson will be better than gotisbehere, but you definitely present the dream case.
  12. again, all this talk about how a player isnt worth x, y, z forgets that this is the trade deadline and all the contenders will overpay for spare parts. the idea that youre going to get a good player for cheap or for marginal prospects is fools gold.
  13. monahan to the jets for a first round pick.
  14. all the top corners are likely to be gone by the time the lions pick. but you never know, drafts are funny things.
  15. i seriously doubt he is there.
  16. cause he's white so no one thinks he is fast enough to play corner.
  17. nobody cares about your cutesy formula one references.
  18. from pierre: "But I think Tanev gets dealt in the end. (Vancouver, by the way, tried hard to have him included in the Lindholm trade, but the price point was too high.) There are just too many teams with interest. The general price tag right now from Calgary is a second-round pick plus another asset, according to league sources. If a team would be willing to jump up to a first-round pick, theyโ€™d probably get Tanev now." do you give up a second and beeggren for tanev? if the leafs offer a first do you beat it? if hanifin costs you edvinsson or asp and a first (plus the $7m it costs to resign him) do you do it? i dont do either. still have to pay seider and raymond. edvinsson could be hanifin in a couple years. a second for tanev might be doable but someone will beat it.
  19. is giving up a 3rd rounder for husso a "loss" on the yzerscorecard? maybe a tie.
  20. dont be hurt. we need to trade you.
  21. the statue he builds to himself will have hair. and probably have a list of all the great things the organization has done for the community.
  22. edvinsson? ๐Ÿ˜‰
  23. and remember, the wings have to BEAT the vancouver deal. the wings' first round pick will be better, but they have to beat the "best offensive defenseman in the ohl" and a guy who scored 39 goals last year and a "low(er) level prospect. the wings have ONE prospect who matches up with a guy labeled "the best offensive defenseman in the ohl" and that's sandin pelikka. dont give me any bull**** about buium or wallinder. buium is still stuck in college and wallinder is not tearing up the ahl. the wings have no one who matches with kuznetsov. their best pure goal scorer is debrincat. sprong is a lesser version of kuznetsov. debrincat is much more valuable. sprong isnt valuable enough. lower level 3rd round pick physical player in the minors? mazur. savage. dylan james? that's who youre talking about. its quite possible the canucks see the wings' system differently. we'll never know.
  24. youre taking this way too seriously. i ask you again: who on the wings is equivalent to kuznetsov? 39 goals last year.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...