Some are that way. Walton probably liked his truck. Many of them like to own lots of sports cars or big mansions without putting a dent in their wealth.
It can be easily looked up. I just don't know how reliable anything is since they don't show their books. One list (from Forbes) showed that all had revenues exceeding operating expenses except the Yankees and Mets. It also showed the two NY teams didn't make much much revenue which was odd.
The radio announcer needs to be descriptive and to have a some style. I'd rather have the TV announcer be bland. I can see what's happening. I don't need to have an announcer getting in the way.
I should say that I am apolitical with mostly liberal ideals. I don't pretend that either party cares about anyone's ideals.
I have little interest in the financial side of the game and even less interest in whether the Illitch's make a profit or whether baseball becomes more popular. I think it is almost always a good thing for fans if their owner is willing to spend a lot of money.
He definitely looks like a relief pitcher. He'll be pretty solid for a long stretch and say some funny stuff and everyone will like him. Then he'll blow a couple of leads and we'll all be arguing about whether he is good or not.
You must be following a different saber crowd than me. All I see is them trashing owners on twitter and other places. While I generally agree with them politically, I think politics and sabermetrics should not be mixed.
A bigger pool of money for international free agents is one.
I think indirect tanking is more likely where teams primarily want to save money but still reap the reward of draft picks.