-
Posts
9,639 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by MichiganCardinal
-
I’m in a very similar place as @buddha Oregon over JMU, 41-10 Oklahoma over Alabama, 24-10 Ole Miss over Tulane, 31-17 Texas A&M over Miami, 38-16 Oregon over Texas Tech, 35-20 Indiana over Oklahoma, 21-17 Georgia over Ole Miss, 42-20 Ohio State over Texas A&M, 24-23 Oregon over Indiana, 21-10 Georgia over Ohio State, 27-20 Georgia over Oregon, 30-24
-
Exactly. This gives a glimmer of hope to every Minnesota, Rutgers, Kansas, Wake Forest, and NC State fan out there. And more. College football may be evolving fast but it doesn’t mean it’s impossible for your team to succeed.
-
Good for IU. Good for college football.
-
Week 14: Bears @ Packers (4:25) Week 15: Browns @ Bears (1:00), Lions @ Rams (4:25), Packers @ Broncos (4:25) Week 16: Packers @ Bears (Saturday Night), Steelers @ Lions (4:25) Week 17: Lions @ Vikings (Christmas Day), Ravens @ Packers (TBD), Bears @ Niners (Sunday Night) Week 18: Lions @ Bears (TBD), Packers @ Vikings (TBD) Lots of important football to be played and only a game-and-a-half out of 1st in the division. It's not out of the question that 3-1 could be good enough if the Packers lose difficult games to the Broncos and/or Ravens. Would be very helpful for the Bears and Packers to split their two against each other.
-
I would counter that he defies that with what he's doing this year with the likes of Trystan Colon, Kayode Awosika, and the ghost of Graham Glasgow's past being featured at times on the offensive line.
-
When we drafted Gibbs, I liked the pick because I liked the player, but I also thought a reasonable strategy was to draft a running back in the first two or three rounds once every five years and never give one a second contract, because the position is so fragile. Just ride with youth at the position. I still think that's a reasonable strategy for most teams. But I also think you have to acknowledge pure generational talent when you see it. Gibbs is special. He's also got staying power, because he's so agile and elusive that he can generally avoid hard contact. And he's only 23! He could easily keep going another 5-7 years. You have to be smart with running backs, because when they fall off they fall off very quickly. 28-year-old Saquon signed a $41MM deal this offseason and may not rush for half the yards he did last year, behind one of the best offensive lines in football. But that all being said, it would be incredibly stupid to not extend Gibbs. Just keep it to three years or so.
-
I wouldn't be shocked to see them spend the money earmarked for Branch on extending Amik for two or three years instead and drafting a long-term replacement. You can keep Branch around on a one-year deal for 2027, but as awful as an Achilles can be, you have to plan as if he's not going to re-take the field in a Lions uniform.
-
That's likely a career-altering injury for a guy like Branch. You can't put the stretch back in a rubber band and have it be as springy as needed.
